CWE-606
Unchecked Input for Loop Condition
The product does not properly check inputs that are used for loop conditions, potentially leading to a denial of service or other consequences because of excessive looping.
CVE-2022-3252 (GCVE-0-2022-3252)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2022-09-21 18:45
Modified
2024-08-03 01:07
Severity ?
VLAI Severity ?
EPSS score ?
CWE
- CWE-606 - Unchecked Input for Loop Condition
Summary
Improper detection of complete HTTP body decompression SwiftNIO Extras provides a pair of helpers for transparently decompressing received HTTP request or response bodies. These two objects (HTTPRequestDecompressor and HTTPResponseDecompressor) both failed to detect when the decompressed body was considered complete. If trailing junk data was appended to the HTTP message body, the code would repeatedly attempt to decompress this data and fail. This would lead to an infinite loop making no forward progress, leading to livelock of the system and denial-of-service. This issue can be triggered by any attacker capable of sending a compressed HTTP message. Most commonly this is HTTP servers, as compressed HTTP messages cannot be negotiated for HTTP requests, but it is possible that users have configured decompression for HTTP requests as well. The attack is low effort, and likely to be reached without requiring any privilege or system access. The impact on availability is high: the process immediately becomes unavailable but does not immediately crash, meaning that it is possible for the process to remain in this state until an administrator intervenes or an automated circuit breaker fires. If left unchecked this issue will very slowly exhaust memory resources due to repeated buffer allocation, but the buffers are not written to and so it is possible that the processes will not terminate for quite some time. This risk can be mitigated by removing transparent HTTP message decompression. The issue is fixed by correctly detecting the termination of the compressed body as reported by zlib and refusing to decompress further data. The issue was found by Vojtech Rylko (https://github.com/vojtarylko) and reported publicly on GitHub.
References
| ► | URL | Tags |
|---|---|---|
Impacted products
| Vendor | Product | Version | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Swift Project | SwiftNIO Extras |
Version: unspecified < 1.14.0 |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-03T01:07:05.521Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://github.com/apple/swift-nio-extras/security/advisories/GHSA-773g-x274-8qmf"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "SwiftNIO Extras",
"vendor": "Swift Project",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "1.14.0",
"status": "affected",
"version": "unspecified",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Improper detection of complete HTTP body decompression SwiftNIO Extras provides a pair of helpers for transparently decompressing received HTTP request or response bodies. These two objects (HTTPRequestDecompressor and HTTPResponseDecompressor) both failed to detect when the decompressed body was considered complete. If trailing junk data was appended to the HTTP message body, the code would repeatedly attempt to decompress this data and fail. This would lead to an infinite loop making no forward progress, leading to livelock of the system and denial-of-service. This issue can be triggered by any attacker capable of sending a compressed HTTP message. Most commonly this is HTTP servers, as compressed HTTP messages cannot be negotiated for HTTP requests, but it is possible that users have configured decompression for HTTP requests as well. The attack is low effort, and likely to be reached without requiring any privilege or system access. The impact on availability is high: the process immediately becomes unavailable but does not immediately crash, meaning that it is possible for the process to remain in this state until an administrator intervenes or an automated circuit breaker fires. If left unchecked this issue will very slowly exhaust memory resources due to repeated buffer allocation, but the buffers are not written to and so it is possible that the processes will not terminate for quite some time. This risk can be mitigated by removing transparent HTTP message decompression. The issue is fixed by correctly detecting the termination of the compressed body as reported by zlib and refusing to decompress further data. The issue was found by Vojtech Rylko (https://github.com/vojtarylko) and reported publicly on GitHub."
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-606",
"description": "CWE-606: Unchecked Input for Loop Condition",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2022-09-21T18:45:16",
"orgId": "e4a1ddda-f4f5-496e-96c8-82c37d06abd0",
"shortName": "Swift"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/apple/swift-nio-extras/security/advisories/GHSA-773g-x274-8qmf"
}
],
"x_legacyV4Record": {
"CVE_data_meta": {
"ASSIGNER": "cve@forums.swift.org",
"ID": "CVE-2022-3252",
"STATE": "PUBLIC"
},
"affects": {
"vendor": {
"vendor_data": [
{
"product": {
"product_data": [
{
"product_name": "SwiftNIO Extras",
"version": {
"version_data": [
{
"version_affected": "\u003c",
"version_value": "1.14.0"
}
]
}
}
]
},
"vendor_name": "Swift Project"
}
]
}
},
"data_format": "MITRE",
"data_type": "CVE",
"data_version": "4.0",
"description": {
"description_data": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "Improper detection of complete HTTP body decompression SwiftNIO Extras provides a pair of helpers for transparently decompressing received HTTP request or response bodies. These two objects (HTTPRequestDecompressor and HTTPResponseDecompressor) both failed to detect when the decompressed body was considered complete. If trailing junk data was appended to the HTTP message body, the code would repeatedly attempt to decompress this data and fail. This would lead to an infinite loop making no forward progress, leading to livelock of the system and denial-of-service. This issue can be triggered by any attacker capable of sending a compressed HTTP message. Most commonly this is HTTP servers, as compressed HTTP messages cannot be negotiated for HTTP requests, but it is possible that users have configured decompression for HTTP requests as well. The attack is low effort, and likely to be reached without requiring any privilege or system access. The impact on availability is high: the process immediately becomes unavailable but does not immediately crash, meaning that it is possible for the process to remain in this state until an administrator intervenes or an automated circuit breaker fires. If left unchecked this issue will very slowly exhaust memory resources due to repeated buffer allocation, but the buffers are not written to and so it is possible that the processes will not terminate for quite some time. This risk can be mitigated by removing transparent HTTP message decompression. The issue is fixed by correctly detecting the termination of the compressed body as reported by zlib and refusing to decompress further data. The issue was found by Vojtech Rylko (https://github.com/vojtarylko) and reported publicly on GitHub."
}
]
},
"problemtype": {
"problemtype_data": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "CWE-606: Unchecked Input for Loop Condition"
}
]
}
]
},
"references": {
"reference_data": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/apple/swift-nio-extras/security/advisories/GHSA-773g-x274-8qmf",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "https://github.com/apple/swift-nio-extras/security/advisories/GHSA-773g-x274-8qmf"
}
]
}
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "e4a1ddda-f4f5-496e-96c8-82c37d06abd0",
"assignerShortName": "Swift",
"cveId": "CVE-2022-3252",
"datePublished": "2022-09-21T18:45:16",
"dateReserved": "2022-09-20T00:00:00",
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-03T01:07:05.521Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
CVE-2023-3446 (GCVE-0-2023-3446)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2023-07-19 11:31
Modified
2025-04-23 16:20
Severity ?
VLAI Severity ?
EPSS score ?
CWE
- CWE-606 - Unchecked Input for Loop Condition
Summary
Issue summary: Checking excessively long DH keys or parameters may be very slow.
Impact summary: Applications that use the functions DH_check(), DH_check_ex()
or EVP_PKEY_param_check() to check a DH key or DH parameters may experience long
delays. Where the key or parameters that are being checked have been obtained
from an untrusted source this may lead to a Denial of Service.
The function DH_check() performs various checks on DH parameters. One of those
checks confirms that the modulus ('p' parameter) is not too large. Trying to use
a very large modulus is slow and OpenSSL will not normally use a modulus which
is over 10,000 bits in length.
However the DH_check() function checks numerous aspects of the key or parameters
that have been supplied. Some of those checks use the supplied modulus value
even if it has already been found to be too large.
An application that calls DH_check() and supplies a key or parameters obtained
from an untrusted source could be vulernable to a Denial of Service attack.
The function DH_check() is itself called by a number of other OpenSSL functions.
An application calling any of those other functions may similarly be affected.
The other functions affected by this are DH_check_ex() and
EVP_PKEY_param_check().
Also vulnerable are the OpenSSL dhparam and pkeyparam command line applications
when using the '-check' option.
The OpenSSL SSL/TLS implementation is not affected by this issue.
The OpenSSL 3.0 and 3.1 FIPS providers are not affected by this issue.
References
Impacted products
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-02T06:55:03.577Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "OpenSSL Advisory",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20230719.txt"
},
{
"name": "3.1.2 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=fc9867c1e03c22ebf56943be205202e576aabf23"
},
{
"name": "3.0.10 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=1fa20cf2f506113c761777127a38bce5068740eb"
},
{
"name": "1.1.1v git commit",
"tags": [
"patch",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=8780a896543a654e757db1b9396383f9d8095528"
},
{
"name": "1.0.2zi patch (premium)",
"tags": [
"patch",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=9a0a4d3c1e7138915563c0df4fe6a3f9377b839c"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/07/19/4"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/07/19/5"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/07/19/6"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/07/31/1"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20230803-0011/"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2023/08/msg00019.html"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202402-08"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/05/16/1"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
},
{
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "LOW",
"baseScore": 5.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L",
"version": "3.1"
}
},
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2023-3446",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-04-23T13:26:22.087194Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-04-23T16:20:00.400Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "OpenSSL",
"vendor": "OpenSSL",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "3.1.2",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.1.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "3.0.10",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.0.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "1.1.1v",
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.1.1",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThan": "1.0.2zi",
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.0.2",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "reporter",
"user": "00000000-0000-4000-9000-000000000000",
"value": "OSSfuzz"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "remediation developer",
"user": "00000000-0000-4000-9000-000000000000",
"value": "Matt Caswell"
}
],
"datePublic": "2023-07-13T00:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "Issue summary: Checking excessively long DH keys or parameters may be very slow.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eImpact summary: Applications that use the functions DH_check(), DH_check_ex()\u003cbr\u003eor EVP_PKEY_param_check() to check a DH key or DH parameters may experience long\u003cbr\u003edelays. Where the key or parameters that are being checked have been obtained\u003cbr\u003efrom an untrusted source this may lead to a Denial of Service.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThe function DH_check() performs various checks on DH parameters. One of those\u003cbr\u003echecks confirms that the modulus (\u0027p\u0027 parameter) is not too large. Trying to use\u003cbr\u003ea very large modulus is slow and OpenSSL will not normally use a modulus which\u003cbr\u003eis over 10,000 bits in length.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eHowever the DH_check() function checks numerous aspects of the key or parameters\u003cbr\u003ethat have been supplied. Some of those checks use the supplied modulus value\u003cbr\u003eeven if it has already been found to be too large.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eAn application that calls DH_check() and supplies a key or parameters obtained\u003cbr\u003efrom an untrusted source could be vulernable to a Denial of Service attack.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThe function DH_check() is itself called by a number of other OpenSSL functions.\u003cbr\u003eAn application calling any of those other functions may similarly be affected.\u003cbr\u003eThe other functions affected by this are DH_check_ex() and\u003cbr\u003eEVP_PKEY_param_check().\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eAlso vulnerable are the OpenSSL dhparam and pkeyparam command line applications\u003cbr\u003ewhen using the \u0027-check\u0027 option.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThe OpenSSL SSL/TLS implementation is not affected by this issue.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThe OpenSSL 3.0 and 3.1 FIPS providers are not affected by this issue."
}
],
"value": "Issue summary: Checking excessively long DH keys or parameters may be very slow.\n\nImpact summary: Applications that use the functions DH_check(), DH_check_ex()\nor EVP_PKEY_param_check() to check a DH key or DH parameters may experience long\ndelays. Where the key or parameters that are being checked have been obtained\nfrom an untrusted source this may lead to a Denial of Service.\n\nThe function DH_check() performs various checks on DH parameters. One of those\nchecks confirms that the modulus (\u0027p\u0027 parameter) is not too large. Trying to use\na very large modulus is slow and OpenSSL will not normally use a modulus which\nis over 10,000 bits in length.\n\nHowever the DH_check() function checks numerous aspects of the key or parameters\nthat have been supplied. Some of those checks use the supplied modulus value\neven if it has already been found to be too large.\n\nAn application that calls DH_check() and supplies a key or parameters obtained\nfrom an untrusted source could be vulernable to a Denial of Service attack.\n\nThe function DH_check() is itself called by a number of other OpenSSL functions.\nAn application calling any of those other functions may similarly be affected.\nThe other functions affected by this are DH_check_ex() and\nEVP_PKEY_param_check().\n\nAlso vulnerable are the OpenSSL dhparam and pkeyparam command line applications\nwhen using the \u0027-check\u0027 option.\n\nThe OpenSSL SSL/TLS implementation is not affected by this issue.\nThe OpenSSL 3.0 and 3.1 FIPS providers are not affected by this issue."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"format": "other",
"other": {
"content": {
"text": "Low"
},
"type": "https://www.openssl.org/policies/secpolicy.html"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-606",
"description": "CWE-606 Unchecked Input for Loop Condition",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-10-14T14:55:47.238Z",
"orgId": "3a12439a-ef3a-4c79-92e6-6081a721f1e5",
"shortName": "openssl"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "OpenSSL Advisory",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20230719.txt"
},
{
"name": "3.1.2 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=fc9867c1e03c22ebf56943be205202e576aabf23"
},
{
"name": "3.0.10 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=1fa20cf2f506113c761777127a38bce5068740eb"
},
{
"name": "1.1.1v git commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=8780a896543a654e757db1b9396383f9d8095528"
},
{
"name": "1.0.2zi patch (premium)",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=9a0a4d3c1e7138915563c0df4fe6a3f9377b839c"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Excessive time spent checking DH keys and parameters",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.1.0-dev"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "3a12439a-ef3a-4c79-92e6-6081a721f1e5",
"assignerShortName": "openssl",
"cveId": "CVE-2023-3446",
"datePublished": "2023-07-19T11:31:34.994Z",
"dateReserved": "2023-06-28T14:21:39.968Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-04-23T16:20:00.400Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
CVE-2023-3817 (GCVE-0-2023-3817)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2023-07-31 15:34
Modified
2025-05-05 15:53
Severity ?
VLAI Severity ?
EPSS score ?
CWE
- CWE-606 - Unchecked Input for Loop Condition
Summary
Issue summary: Checking excessively long DH keys or parameters may be very slow.
Impact summary: Applications that use the functions DH_check(), DH_check_ex()
or EVP_PKEY_param_check() to check a DH key or DH parameters may experience long
delays. Where the key or parameters that are being checked have been obtained
from an untrusted source this may lead to a Denial of Service.
The function DH_check() performs various checks on DH parameters. After fixing
CVE-2023-3446 it was discovered that a large q parameter value can also trigger
an overly long computation during some of these checks. A correct q value,
if present, cannot be larger than the modulus p parameter, thus it is
unnecessary to perform these checks if q is larger than p.
An application that calls DH_check() and supplies a key or parameters obtained
from an untrusted source could be vulnerable to a Denial of Service attack.
The function DH_check() is itself called by a number of other OpenSSL functions.
An application calling any of those other functions may similarly be affected.
The other functions affected by this are DH_check_ex() and
EVP_PKEY_param_check().
Also vulnerable are the OpenSSL dhparam and pkeyparam command line applications
when using the "-check" option.
The OpenSSL SSL/TLS implementation is not affected by this issue.
The OpenSSL 3.0 and 3.1 FIPS providers are not affected by this issue.
References
| ► | URL | Tags | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Impacted products
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-02T07:08:50.496Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "OpenSSL Advisory",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20230731.txt"
},
{
"name": "3.1.2 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=6a1eb62c29db6cb5eec707f9338aee00f44e26f5"
},
{
"name": "3.0.10 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=9002fd07327a91f35ba6c1307e71fa6fd4409b7f"
},
{
"name": "1.1.1v git commit",
"tags": [
"patch",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=91ddeba0f2269b017dc06c46c993a788974b1aa5"
},
{
"name": "1.0.2zi patch (premium)",
"tags": [
"patch",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=869ad69aadd985c7b8ca6f4e5dd0eb274c9f3644"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2023/Jul/43"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/07/31/1"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2023/08/msg00019.html"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20230818-0014/"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/09/22/9"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/09/22/11"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20231027-0008/"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/11/06/2"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202402-08"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20240621-0006/"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
},
{
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "LOW",
"baseScore": 5.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L",
"version": "3.1"
}
},
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2023-3817",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-04-23T13:26:20.624850Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-05-05T15:53:49.014Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "OpenSSL",
"vendor": "OpenSSL",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "3.1.2",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.1.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "3.0.10",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.0.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "1.1.1v",
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.1.1",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThan": "1.0.2zi",
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.0.2",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"user": "00000000-0000-4000-9000-000000000000",
"value": "Bernd Edlinger"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "remediation developer",
"user": "00000000-0000-4000-9000-000000000000",
"value": "Tomas Mraz"
}
],
"datePublic": "2023-07-31T00:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "Issue summary: Checking excessively long DH keys or parameters may be very slow.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eImpact summary: Applications that use the functions DH_check(), DH_check_ex()\u003cbr\u003eor EVP_PKEY_param_check() to check a DH key or DH parameters may experience long\u003cbr\u003edelays. Where the key or parameters that are being checked have been obtained\u003cbr\u003efrom an untrusted source this may lead to a Denial of Service.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThe function DH_check() performs various checks on DH parameters. After fixing\u003cbr\u003eCVE-2023-3446 it was discovered that a large q parameter value can also trigger\u003cbr\u003ean overly long computation during some of these checks. A correct q value,\u003cbr\u003eif present, cannot be larger than the modulus p parameter, thus it is\u003cbr\u003eunnecessary to perform these checks if q is larger than p.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eAn application that calls DH_check() and supplies a key or parameters obtained\u003cbr\u003efrom an untrusted source could be vulnerable to a Denial of Service attack.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThe function DH_check() is itself called by a number of other OpenSSL functions.\u003cbr\u003eAn application calling any of those other functions may similarly be affected.\u003cbr\u003eThe other functions affected by this are DH_check_ex() and\u003cbr\u003eEVP_PKEY_param_check().\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eAlso vulnerable are the OpenSSL dhparam and pkeyparam command line applications\u003cbr\u003ewhen using the \"-check\" option.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThe OpenSSL SSL/TLS implementation is not affected by this issue.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThe OpenSSL 3.0 and 3.1 FIPS providers are not affected by this issue."
}
],
"value": "Issue summary: Checking excessively long DH keys or parameters may be very slow.\n\nImpact summary: Applications that use the functions DH_check(), DH_check_ex()\nor EVP_PKEY_param_check() to check a DH key or DH parameters may experience long\ndelays. Where the key or parameters that are being checked have been obtained\nfrom an untrusted source this may lead to a Denial of Service.\n\nThe function DH_check() performs various checks on DH parameters. After fixing\nCVE-2023-3446 it was discovered that a large q parameter value can also trigger\nan overly long computation during some of these checks. A correct q value,\nif present, cannot be larger than the modulus p parameter, thus it is\nunnecessary to perform these checks if q is larger than p.\n\nAn application that calls DH_check() and supplies a key or parameters obtained\nfrom an untrusted source could be vulnerable to a Denial of Service attack.\n\nThe function DH_check() is itself called by a number of other OpenSSL functions.\nAn application calling any of those other functions may similarly be affected.\nThe other functions affected by this are DH_check_ex() and\nEVP_PKEY_param_check().\n\nAlso vulnerable are the OpenSSL dhparam and pkeyparam command line applications\nwhen using the \"-check\" option.\n\nThe OpenSSL SSL/TLS implementation is not affected by this issue.\n\nThe OpenSSL 3.0 and 3.1 FIPS providers are not affected by this issue."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"format": "other",
"other": {
"content": {
"text": "Low"
},
"type": "https://www.openssl.org/policies/secpolicy.html"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-606",
"description": "CWE-606 Unchecked Input for Loop Condition",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-10-14T14:55:48.907Z",
"orgId": "3a12439a-ef3a-4c79-92e6-6081a721f1e5",
"shortName": "openssl"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "OpenSSL Advisory",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20230731.txt"
},
{
"name": "3.1.2 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=6a1eb62c29db6cb5eec707f9338aee00f44e26f5"
},
{
"name": "3.0.10 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=9002fd07327a91f35ba6c1307e71fa6fd4409b7f"
},
{
"name": "1.1.1v git commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=91ddeba0f2269b017dc06c46c993a788974b1aa5"
},
{
"name": "1.0.2zi patch (premium)",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=869ad69aadd985c7b8ca6f4e5dd0eb274c9f3644"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Excessive time spent checking DH q parameter value",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.1.0-dev"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "3a12439a-ef3a-4c79-92e6-6081a721f1e5",
"assignerShortName": "openssl",
"cveId": "CVE-2023-3817",
"datePublished": "2023-07-31T15:34:13.627Z",
"dateReserved": "2023-07-21T08:47:25.638Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-05-05T15:53:49.014Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
CVE-2023-5678 (GCVE-0-2023-5678)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2023-11-06 15:47
Modified
2024-10-14 14:55
Severity ?
VLAI Severity ?
EPSS score ?
CWE
- CWE-606 - Unchecked Input for Loop Condition
Summary
Issue summary: Generating excessively long X9.42 DH keys or checking
excessively long X9.42 DH keys or parameters may be very slow.
Impact summary: Applications that use the functions DH_generate_key() to
generate an X9.42 DH key may experience long delays. Likewise, applications
that use DH_check_pub_key(), DH_check_pub_key_ex() or EVP_PKEY_public_check()
to check an X9.42 DH key or X9.42 DH parameters may experience long delays.
Where the key or parameters that are being checked have been obtained from
an untrusted source this may lead to a Denial of Service.
While DH_check() performs all the necessary checks (as of CVE-2023-3817),
DH_check_pub_key() doesn't make any of these checks, and is therefore
vulnerable for excessively large P and Q parameters.
Likewise, while DH_generate_key() performs a check for an excessively large
P, it doesn't check for an excessively large Q.
An application that calls DH_generate_key() or DH_check_pub_key() and
supplies a key or parameters obtained from an untrusted source could be
vulnerable to a Denial of Service attack.
DH_generate_key() and DH_check_pub_key() are also called by a number of
other OpenSSL functions. An application calling any of those other
functions may similarly be affected. The other functions affected by this
are DH_check_pub_key_ex(), EVP_PKEY_public_check(), and EVP_PKEY_generate().
Also vulnerable are the OpenSSL pkey command line application when using the
"-pubcheck" option, as well as the OpenSSL genpkey command line application.
The OpenSSL SSL/TLS implementation is not affected by this issue.
The OpenSSL 3.0 and 3.1 FIPS providers are not affected by this issue.
References
| ► | URL | Tags | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Impacted products
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-02T08:07:32.546Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "OpenSSL Advisory",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20231106.txt"
},
{
"name": "1.0.2zj git commit",
"tags": [
"patch",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=34efaef6c103d636ab507a0cc34dca4d3aecc055"
},
{
"name": "1.1.1x git commit",
"tags": [
"patch",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=710fee740904b6290fef0dd5536fbcedbc38ff0c"
},
{
"name": "3.0.13 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=db925ae2e65d0d925adef429afc37f75bd1c2017"
},
{
"name": "3.1.5 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=ddeb4b6c6d527e54ce9a99cba785c0f7776e54b6"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20231130-0010/"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/03/11/1"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "OpenSSL",
"vendor": "OpenSSL",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "1.0.2zj",
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.0.2",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThan": "1.1.1x",
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.1.1",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThan": "3.0.13",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.0.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "3.1.5",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.1.0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"user": "00000000-0000-4000-9000-000000000000",
"value": "David Benjamin (Google)"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "remediation developer",
"user": "00000000-0000-4000-9000-000000000000",
"value": "Richard Levitte"
}
],
"datePublic": "2023-11-06T00:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "Issue summary: Generating excessively long X9.42 DH keys or checking\u003cbr\u003eexcessively long X9.42 DH keys or parameters may be very slow.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eImpact summary: Applications that use the functions DH_generate_key() to\u003cbr\u003egenerate an X9.42 DH key may experience long delays. Likewise, applications\u003cbr\u003ethat use DH_check_pub_key(), DH_check_pub_key_ex() or EVP_PKEY_public_check()\u003cbr\u003eto check an X9.42 DH key or X9.42 DH parameters may experience long delays.\u003cbr\u003eWhere the key or parameters that are being checked have been obtained from\u003cbr\u003ean untrusted source this may lead to a Denial of Service.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eWhile DH_check() performs all the necessary checks (as of CVE-2023-3817),\u003cbr\u003eDH_check_pub_key() doesn\u0027t make any of these checks, and is therefore\u003cbr\u003evulnerable for excessively large P and Q parameters.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eLikewise, while DH_generate_key() performs a check for an excessively large\u003cbr\u003eP, it doesn\u0027t check for an excessively large Q.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eAn application that calls DH_generate_key() or DH_check_pub_key() and\u003cbr\u003esupplies a key or parameters obtained from an untrusted source could be\u003cbr\u003evulnerable to a Denial of Service attack.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eDH_generate_key() and DH_check_pub_key() are also called by a number of\u003cbr\u003eother OpenSSL functions. An application calling any of those other\u003cbr\u003efunctions may similarly be affected. The other functions affected by this\u003cbr\u003eare DH_check_pub_key_ex(), EVP_PKEY_public_check(), and EVP_PKEY_generate().\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eAlso vulnerable are the OpenSSL pkey command line application when using the\u003cbr\u003e\"-pubcheck\" option, as well as the OpenSSL genpkey command line application.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThe OpenSSL SSL/TLS implementation is not affected by this issue.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThe OpenSSL 3.0 and 3.1 FIPS providers are not affected by this issue.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e"
}
],
"value": "Issue summary: Generating excessively long X9.42 DH keys or checking\nexcessively long X9.42 DH keys or parameters may be very slow.\n\nImpact summary: Applications that use the functions DH_generate_key() to\ngenerate an X9.42 DH key may experience long delays. Likewise, applications\nthat use DH_check_pub_key(), DH_check_pub_key_ex() or EVP_PKEY_public_check()\nto check an X9.42 DH key or X9.42 DH parameters may experience long delays.\nWhere the key or parameters that are being checked have been obtained from\nan untrusted source this may lead to a Denial of Service.\n\nWhile DH_check() performs all the necessary checks (as of CVE-2023-3817),\nDH_check_pub_key() doesn\u0027t make any of these checks, and is therefore\nvulnerable for excessively large P and Q parameters.\n\nLikewise, while DH_generate_key() performs a check for an excessively large\nP, it doesn\u0027t check for an excessively large Q.\n\nAn application that calls DH_generate_key() or DH_check_pub_key() and\nsupplies a key or parameters obtained from an untrusted source could be\nvulnerable to a Denial of Service attack.\n\nDH_generate_key() and DH_check_pub_key() are also called by a number of\nother OpenSSL functions. An application calling any of those other\nfunctions may similarly be affected. The other functions affected by this\nare DH_check_pub_key_ex(), EVP_PKEY_public_check(), and EVP_PKEY_generate().\n\nAlso vulnerable are the OpenSSL pkey command line application when using the\n\"-pubcheck\" option, as well as the OpenSSL genpkey command line application.\n\nThe OpenSSL SSL/TLS implementation is not affected by this issue.\n\nThe OpenSSL 3.0 and 3.1 FIPS providers are not affected by this issue."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"format": "other",
"other": {
"content": {
"text": "LOW"
},
"type": "https://www.openssl.org/policies/secpolicy.html"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-606",
"description": "CWE-606 Unchecked Input for Loop Condition",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-10-14T14:55:53.778Z",
"orgId": "3a12439a-ef3a-4c79-92e6-6081a721f1e5",
"shortName": "openssl"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "OpenSSL Advisory",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20231106.txt"
},
{
"name": "1.0.2zj git commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=34efaef6c103d636ab507a0cc34dca4d3aecc055"
},
{
"name": "1.1.1x git commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=710fee740904b6290fef0dd5536fbcedbc38ff0c"
},
{
"name": "3.0.13 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=db925ae2e65d0d925adef429afc37f75bd1c2017"
},
{
"name": "3.1.5 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=ddeb4b6c6d527e54ce9a99cba785c0f7776e54b6"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Excessive time spent in DH check / generation with large Q parameter value",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.1.0-dev"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "3a12439a-ef3a-4c79-92e6-6081a721f1e5",
"assignerShortName": "openssl",
"cveId": "CVE-2023-5678",
"datePublished": "2023-11-06T15:47:30.795Z",
"dateReserved": "2023-10-20T09:38:43.518Z",
"dateUpdated": "2024-10-14T14:55:53.778Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
CVE-2023-6237 (GCVE-0-2023-6237)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2024-04-25 06:27
Modified
2024-11-01 14:28
Severity ?
VLAI Severity ?
EPSS score ?
CWE
- CWE-606 - Unchecked Input for Loop Condition
Summary
Issue summary: Checking excessively long invalid RSA public keys may take
a long time.
Impact summary: Applications that use the function EVP_PKEY_public_check()
to check RSA public keys may experience long delays. Where the key that
is being checked has been obtained from an untrusted source this may lead
to a Denial of Service.
When function EVP_PKEY_public_check() is called on RSA public keys,
a computation is done to confirm that the RSA modulus, n, is composite.
For valid RSA keys, n is a product of two or more large primes and this
computation completes quickly. However, if n is an overly large prime,
then this computation would take a long time.
An application that calls EVP_PKEY_public_check() and supplies an RSA key
obtained from an untrusted source could be vulnerable to a Denial of Service
attack.
The function EVP_PKEY_public_check() is not called from other OpenSSL
functions however it is called from the OpenSSL pkey command line
application. For that reason that application is also vulnerable if used
with the '-pubin' and '-check' options on untrusted data.
The OpenSSL SSL/TLS implementation is not affected by this issue.
The OpenSSL 3.0 and 3.1 FIPS providers are affected by this issue.
References
| ► | URL | Tags | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||||||||
Impacted products
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-02T08:21:18.096Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "OpenSSL Advisory",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20240115.txt"
},
{
"name": "3.0.13 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/18c02492138d1eb8b6548cb26e7b625fb2414a2a"
},
{
"name": "3.1.5 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/a830f551557d3d66a84bbb18a5b889c640c36294"
},
{
"name": "3.2.1 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/0b0f7abfb37350794a4b8960fafc292cd5d1b84d"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/03/11/1"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20240531-0007/"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
},
{
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 5.9,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
}
},
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2023-6237",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2024-08-20T14:44:52.382969Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-11-01T14:28:51.338Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "OpenSSL",
"vendor": "OpenSSL",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "3.0.13",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.0.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "3.1.5",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.1.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "3.2.1",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.2.0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"user": "00000000-0000-4000-9000-000000000000",
"value": "OSS-Fuzz"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "remediation developer",
"user": "00000000-0000-4000-9000-000000000000",
"value": "Tomas Mraz"
}
],
"datePublic": "2024-01-15T00:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "Issue summary: Checking excessively long invalid RSA public keys may take\u003cbr\u003ea long time.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eImpact summary: Applications that use the function EVP_PKEY_public_check()\u003cbr\u003eto check RSA public keys may experience long delays. Where the key that\u003cbr\u003eis being checked has been obtained from an untrusted source this may lead\u003cbr\u003eto a Denial of Service.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eWhen function EVP_PKEY_public_check() is called on RSA public keys,\u003cbr\u003ea computation is done to confirm that the RSA modulus, n, is composite.\u003cbr\u003eFor valid RSA keys, n is a product of two or more large primes and this\u003cbr\u003ecomputation completes quickly. However, if n is an overly large prime,\u003cbr\u003ethen this computation would take a long time.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eAn application that calls EVP_PKEY_public_check() and supplies an RSA key\u003cbr\u003eobtained from an untrusted source could be vulnerable to a Denial of Service\u003cbr\u003eattack.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThe function EVP_PKEY_public_check() is not called from other OpenSSL\u003cbr\u003efunctions however it is called from the OpenSSL pkey command line\u003cbr\u003eapplication. For that reason that application is also vulnerable if used\u003cbr\u003ewith the \u0027-pubin\u0027 and \u0027-check\u0027 options on untrusted data.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThe OpenSSL SSL/TLS implementation is not affected by this issue.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThe OpenSSL 3.0 and 3.1 FIPS providers are affected by this issue."
}
],
"value": "Issue summary: Checking excessively long invalid RSA public keys may take\na long time.\n\nImpact summary: Applications that use the function EVP_PKEY_public_check()\nto check RSA public keys may experience long delays. Where the key that\nis being checked has been obtained from an untrusted source this may lead\nto a Denial of Service.\n\nWhen function EVP_PKEY_public_check() is called on RSA public keys,\na computation is done to confirm that the RSA modulus, n, is composite.\nFor valid RSA keys, n is a product of two or more large primes and this\ncomputation completes quickly. However, if n is an overly large prime,\nthen this computation would take a long time.\n\nAn application that calls EVP_PKEY_public_check() and supplies an RSA key\nobtained from an untrusted source could be vulnerable to a Denial of Service\nattack.\n\nThe function EVP_PKEY_public_check() is not called from other OpenSSL\nfunctions however it is called from the OpenSSL pkey command line\napplication. For that reason that application is also vulnerable if used\nwith the \u0027-pubin\u0027 and \u0027-check\u0027 options on untrusted data.\n\nThe OpenSSL SSL/TLS implementation is not affected by this issue.\n\nThe OpenSSL 3.0 and 3.1 FIPS providers are affected by this issue."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"format": "other",
"other": {
"content": {
"text": "Low"
},
"type": "https://www.openssl.org/policies/secpolicy.html"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-606",
"description": "CWE-606 Unchecked Input for Loop Condition",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-10-14T14:55:56.955Z",
"orgId": "3a12439a-ef3a-4c79-92e6-6081a721f1e5",
"shortName": "openssl"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "OpenSSL Advisory",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20240115.txt"
},
{
"name": "3.0.13 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/18c02492138d1eb8b6548cb26e7b625fb2414a2a"
},
{
"name": "3.1.5 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/a830f551557d3d66a84bbb18a5b889c640c36294"
},
{
"name": "3.2.1 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/0b0f7abfb37350794a4b8960fafc292cd5d1b84d"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Excessive time spent checking invalid RSA public keys",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.1.0-dev"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "3a12439a-ef3a-4c79-92e6-6081a721f1e5",
"assignerShortName": "openssl",
"cveId": "CVE-2023-6237",
"datePublished": "2024-04-25T06:27:26.990Z",
"dateReserved": "2023-11-21T10:16:34.346Z",
"dateUpdated": "2024-11-01T14:28:51.338Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
CVE-2024-13930 (GCVE-0-2024-13930)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2025-05-22 17:55
Modified
2025-05-22 18:42
Severity ?
5.9 (Medium) - CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/S:N/AU:N/R:U/V:C
4.9 (Medium) - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
4.9 (Medium) - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
VLAI Severity ?
EPSS score ?
CWE
- CWE-606 - Unchecked Input for Loop Condition
Summary
An Unchecked Loop Condition in ASPECT provides an attacker the ability to maliciously consume system resources if session administrator credentials become compromised
This issue affects ASPECT-Enterprise: through 3.08.03; NEXUS Series: through 3.08.03; MATRIX Series: through 3.08.03.
References
Impacted products
| Vendor | Product | Version | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ► | ABB | ASPECT-Enterprise |
Version: 0 < |
|||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2024-13930",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-05-22T18:38:22.937899Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-05-22T18:42:02.700Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"platforms": [
"Linux"
],
"product": "ASPECT-Enterprise",
"vendor": "ABB",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "3.08.03",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"platforms": [
"Linux"
],
"product": "NEXUS Series",
"vendor": "ABB",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "3.08.03",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"platforms": [
"Linux"
],
"product": "MATRIX Series",
"vendor": "ABB",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "3.08.03",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "ABB likes to thank Gjoko Krstikj, Zero Science Lab, for reporting the vulnerabilities in responsible disclosure"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "An Unchecked Loop Condition in ASPECT provides an attacker the ability to maliciously consume system resources if session administrator credentials become compromised\u003cbr\u003e\u003cp\u003eThis issue affects ASPECT-Enterprise: through 3.08.03; NEXUS Series: through 3.08.03; MATRIX Series: through 3.08.03.\u003c/p\u003e"
}
],
"value": "An Unchecked Loop Condition in ASPECT provides an attacker the ability to maliciously consume system resources if session administrator credentials become compromised\nThis issue affects ASPECT-Enterprise: through 3.08.03; NEXUS Series: through 3.08.03; MATRIX Series: through 3.08.03."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NO",
"Recovery": "USER",
"Safety": "NEGLIGIBLE",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "PRESENT",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 5.9,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"privilegesRequired": "HIGH",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "CONCENTRATED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/S:N/AU:N/R:U/V:C",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
},
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 4.9,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "HIGH",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-606",
"description": "CWE-606 Unchecked Input for Loop Condition",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-05-22T17:55:28.180Z",
"orgId": "2b718523-d88f-4f37-9bbd-300c20644bf9",
"shortName": "ABB"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://search.abb.com/library/Download.aspx?DocumentID=9AKK108471A0021\u0026LanguageCode=en\u0026DocumentPartId=pdf\u0026Action=Launch"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Authenticated Unchecked Loop Condition",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.2.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "2b718523-d88f-4f37-9bbd-300c20644bf9",
"assignerShortName": "ABB",
"cveId": "CVE-2024-13930",
"datePublished": "2025-05-22T17:55:28.180Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-03-17T14:39:25.865Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-05-22T18:42:02.700Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
CVE-2024-13931 (GCVE-0-2024-13931)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2025-05-22 17:57
Modified
2025-05-22 18:41
Severity ?
VLAI Severity ?
EPSS score ?
CWE
- CWE-606 - Unchecked Input for Loop Condition
Summary
Relative Path Traversal vulnerabilities in ASPECT allow access to file resources if session administrator credentials become compromised.
This issue affects ASPECT-Enterprise: through 3.08.03; NEXUS Series: through 3.08.03; MATRIX Series: through 3.08.03.
References
Impacted products
| Vendor | Product | Version | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ► | ABB | ASPECT-Enterprise |
Version: 0 < |
|||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2024-13931",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-05-22T18:38:16.802327Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-05-22T18:41:54.666Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"platforms": [
"Linux"
],
"product": "ASPECT-Enterprise",
"vendor": "ABB",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "3.08.03",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"platforms": [
"Linux"
],
"product": "NEXUS Series",
"vendor": "ABB",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "3.08.03",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"platforms": [
"Linux"
],
"product": "MATRIX Series",
"vendor": "ABB",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "3.08.03",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "ABB likes to thank Gjoko Krstikj, Zero Science Lab, for reporting the vulnerabilities in responsible disclosure"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "Relative Path Traversal vulnerabilities in ASPECT allow access to file resources if session administrator credentials become compromised.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cp\u003eThis issue affects ASPECT-Enterprise: through 3.08.03; NEXUS Series: through 3.08.03; MATRIX Series: through 3.08.03.\u003c/p\u003e"
}
],
"value": "Relative Path Traversal vulnerabilities in ASPECT allow access to file resources if session administrator credentials become compromised.\nThis issue affects ASPECT-Enterprise: through 3.08.03; NEXUS Series: through 3.08.03; MATRIX Series: through 3.08.03."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NO",
"Recovery": "USER",
"Safety": "NEGLIGIBLE",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "PRESENT",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 7.5,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "HIGH",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "CONCENTRATED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/S:N/AU:N/R:U/V:C",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
},
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 7.2,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "HIGH",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-606",
"description": "CWE-606 Unchecked Input for Loop Condition",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-05-22T17:57:14.819Z",
"orgId": "2b718523-d88f-4f37-9bbd-300c20644bf9",
"shortName": "ABB"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://search.abb.com/library/Download.aspx?DocumentID=9AKK108471A0021\u0026LanguageCode=en\u0026DocumentPartId=pdf\u0026Action=Launch"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Authenticated Relative Path Traversal",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.2.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "2b718523-d88f-4f37-9bbd-300c20644bf9",
"assignerShortName": "ABB",
"cveId": "CVE-2024-13931",
"datePublished": "2025-05-22T17:57:14.819Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-03-17T14:39:29.924Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-05-22T18:41:54.666Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
CVE-2024-43499 (GCVE-0-2024-43499)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2024-11-12 17:53
Modified
2025-07-08 15:40
Severity ?
VLAI Severity ?
EPSS score ?
CWE
Summary
.NET and Visual Studio Denial of Service Vulnerability
References
| ► | URL | Tags |
|---|---|---|
Impacted products
| Vendor | Product | Version | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ► | Microsoft | Microsoft Visual Studio 2022 version 17.6 |
Version: 17.6.0 < 17.6.21 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 7.5,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
}
},
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2024-43499",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2024-11-13T16:28:19.318382Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"description": "CWE-noinfo Not enough information",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-02-04T16:50:10.302Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"platforms": [
"Unknown"
],
"product": "Microsoft Visual Studio 2022 version 17.6",
"vendor": "Microsoft",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "17.6.21",
"status": "affected",
"version": "17.6.0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"platforms": [
"Unknown"
],
"product": "Microsoft Visual Studio 2022 version 17.10",
"vendor": "Microsoft",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "17.10.9",
"status": "affected",
"version": "17.10",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"platforms": [
"Unknown"
],
"product": "Microsoft Visual Studio 2022 version 17.8",
"vendor": "Microsoft",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "17.8.16",
"status": "affected",
"version": "17.8.0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"platforms": [
"Unknown"
],
"product": "Microsoft Visual Studio 2022 version 17.11",
"vendor": "Microsoft",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "17.11.6",
"status": "affected",
"version": "17.11",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"platforms": [
"Unknown"
],
"product": "PowerShell 7.5",
"vendor": "Microsoft",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "7.5.0",
"status": "affected",
"version": "7.5.0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"platforms": [
"Unknown"
],
"product": ".NET 9.0",
"vendor": "Microsoft",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "9.0.0",
"status": "affected",
"version": "9.0.0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"cpeApplicability": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:microsoft:visual_studio:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "17.6.21",
"versionStartIncluding": "17.6.0",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:microsoft:visual_studio:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "17.10.9",
"versionStartIncluding": "17.10",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:microsoft:visual_studio:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "17.8.16",
"versionStartIncluding": "17.8.0",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:microsoft:visual_studio:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "17.11.6",
"versionStartIncluding": "17.11",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:microsoft:powershell:*:-:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "7.5.0",
"versionStartIncluding": "7.5.0",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:microsoft:.net:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "9.0.0",
"versionStartIncluding": "9.0.0",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"datePublic": "2024-11-12T08:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en-US",
"value": ".NET and Visual Studio Denial of Service Vulnerability"
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"baseScore": 7.5,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H/E:U/RL:O/RC:C",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en-US",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-409",
"description": "CWE-409: Improper Handling of Highly Compressed Data (Data Amplification)",
"lang": "en-US",
"type": "CWE"
},
{
"cweId": "CWE-606",
"description": "CWE-606: Unchecked Input for Loop Condition",
"lang": "en-US",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-07-08T15:40:59.877Z",
"orgId": "f38d906d-7342-40ea-92c1-6c4a2c6478c8",
"shortName": "microsoft"
},
"references": [
{
"name": ".NET and Visual Studio Denial of Service Vulnerability",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2024-43499"
}
],
"title": ".NET and Visual Studio Denial of Service Vulnerability"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "f38d906d-7342-40ea-92c1-6c4a2c6478c8",
"assignerShortName": "microsoft",
"cveId": "CVE-2024-43499",
"datePublished": "2024-11-12T17:53:35.848Z",
"dateReserved": "2024-08-14T01:08:33.522Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-07-08T15:40:59.877Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
CVE-2024-4603 (GCVE-0-2024-4603)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2024-05-16 15:21
Modified
2024-10-14 14:56
Severity ?
VLAI Severity ?
EPSS score ?
CWE
- CWE-606 - Unchecked Input for Loop Condition
Summary
Issue summary: Checking excessively long DSA keys or parameters may be very
slow.
Impact summary: Applications that use the functions EVP_PKEY_param_check()
or EVP_PKEY_public_check() to check a DSA public key or DSA parameters may
experience long delays. Where the key or parameters that are being checked
have been obtained from an untrusted source this may lead to a Denial of
Service.
The functions EVP_PKEY_param_check() or EVP_PKEY_public_check() perform
various checks on DSA parameters. Some of those computations take a long time
if the modulus (`p` parameter) is too large.
Trying to use a very large modulus is slow and OpenSSL will not allow using
public keys with a modulus which is over 10,000 bits in length for signature
verification. However the key and parameter check functions do not limit
the modulus size when performing the checks.
An application that calls EVP_PKEY_param_check() or EVP_PKEY_public_check()
and supplies a key or parameters obtained from an untrusted source could be
vulnerable to a Denial of Service attack.
These functions are not called by OpenSSL itself on untrusted DSA keys so
only applications that directly call these functions may be vulnerable.
Also vulnerable are the OpenSSL pkey and pkeyparam command line applications
when using the `-check` option.
The OpenSSL SSL/TLS implementation is not affected by this issue.
The OpenSSL 3.0 and 3.1 FIPS providers are affected by this issue.
References
| ► | URL | Tags | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Impacted products
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-01T20:47:41.528Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "OpenSSL Advisory",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20240516.txt"
},
{
"name": "3.0.14 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/3559e868e58005d15c6013a0c1fd832e51c73397"
},
{
"name": "3.1.6 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/9c39b3858091c152f52513c066ff2c5a47969f0d"
},
{
"name": "3.2.2 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/da343d0605c826ef197aceedc67e8e04f065f740"
},
{
"name": "3.3.1 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/53ea06486d296b890d565fb971b2764fcd826e7e"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/05/16/2"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20240621-0001/"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
},
{
"affected": [
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "openssl",
"vendor": "openssl",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "3.0.14",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.0.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "3.1.6",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.1.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "3.2.2",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.2.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "3.3.1",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.3.0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "LOW",
"baseScore": 5.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L",
"version": "3.1"
}
},
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2024-4603",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2024-05-16T18:27:25.638098Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-834",
"description": "CWE-834 Excessive Iteration",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-13T15:11:57.009Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "OpenSSL",
"vendor": "OpenSSL",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "3.0.14",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.0.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "3.1.6",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.1.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "3.2.2",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.2.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "3.3.1",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.3.0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"user": "00000000-0000-4000-9000-000000000000",
"value": "OSS-Fuzz"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "remediation developer",
"user": "00000000-0000-4000-9000-000000000000",
"value": "Tomas Mraz"
}
],
"datePublic": "2024-05-16T00:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "Issue summary: Checking excessively long DSA keys or parameters may be very\u003cbr\u003eslow.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eImpact summary: Applications that use the functions EVP_PKEY_param_check()\u003cbr\u003eor EVP_PKEY_public_check() to check a DSA public key or DSA parameters may\u003cbr\u003eexperience long delays. Where the key or parameters that are being checked\u003cbr\u003ehave been obtained from an untrusted source this may lead to a Denial of\u003cbr\u003eService.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThe functions EVP_PKEY_param_check() or EVP_PKEY_public_check() perform\u003cbr\u003evarious checks on DSA parameters. Some of those computations take a long time\u003cbr\u003eif the modulus (`p` parameter) is too large.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eTrying to use a very large modulus is slow and OpenSSL will not allow using\u003cbr\u003epublic keys with a modulus which is over 10,000 bits in length for signature\u003cbr\u003everification. However the key and parameter check functions do not limit\u003cbr\u003ethe modulus size when performing the checks.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eAn application that calls EVP_PKEY_param_check() or EVP_PKEY_public_check()\u003cbr\u003eand supplies a key or parameters obtained from an untrusted source could be\u003cbr\u003evulnerable to a Denial of Service attack.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThese functions are not called by OpenSSL itself on untrusted DSA keys so\u003cbr\u003eonly applications that directly call these functions may be vulnerable.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eAlso vulnerable are the OpenSSL pkey and pkeyparam command line applications\u003cbr\u003ewhen using the `-check` option.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThe OpenSSL SSL/TLS implementation is not affected by this issue.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThe OpenSSL 3.0 and 3.1 FIPS providers are affected by this issue."
}
],
"value": "Issue summary: Checking excessively long DSA keys or parameters may be very\nslow.\n\nImpact summary: Applications that use the functions EVP_PKEY_param_check()\nor EVP_PKEY_public_check() to check a DSA public key or DSA parameters may\nexperience long delays. Where the key or parameters that are being checked\nhave been obtained from an untrusted source this may lead to a Denial of\nService.\n\nThe functions EVP_PKEY_param_check() or EVP_PKEY_public_check() perform\nvarious checks on DSA parameters. Some of those computations take a long time\nif the modulus (`p` parameter) is too large.\n\nTrying to use a very large modulus is slow and OpenSSL will not allow using\npublic keys with a modulus which is over 10,000 bits in length for signature\nverification. However the key and parameter check functions do not limit\nthe modulus size when performing the checks.\n\nAn application that calls EVP_PKEY_param_check() or EVP_PKEY_public_check()\nand supplies a key or parameters obtained from an untrusted source could be\nvulnerable to a Denial of Service attack.\n\nThese functions are not called by OpenSSL itself on untrusted DSA keys so\nonly applications that directly call these functions may be vulnerable.\n\nAlso vulnerable are the OpenSSL pkey and pkeyparam command line applications\nwhen using the `-check` option.\n\nThe OpenSSL SSL/TLS implementation is not affected by this issue.\n\nThe OpenSSL 3.0 and 3.1 FIPS providers are affected by this issue."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"format": "other",
"other": {
"content": {
"text": "Low"
},
"type": "https://www.openssl.org/policies/secpolicy.html"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-606",
"description": "CWE-606 Unchecked Input for Loop Condition",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-10-14T14:56:01.784Z",
"orgId": "3a12439a-ef3a-4c79-92e6-6081a721f1e5",
"shortName": "openssl"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "OpenSSL Advisory",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20240516.txt"
},
{
"name": "3.0.14 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/3559e868e58005d15c6013a0c1fd832e51c73397"
},
{
"name": "3.1.6 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/9c39b3858091c152f52513c066ff2c5a47969f0d"
},
{
"name": "3.2.2 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/da343d0605c826ef197aceedc67e8e04f065f740"
},
{
"name": "3.3.1 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/53ea06486d296b890d565fb971b2764fcd826e7e"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Excessive time spent checking DSA keys and parameters",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.1.0-dev"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "3a12439a-ef3a-4c79-92e6-6081a721f1e5",
"assignerShortName": "openssl",
"cveId": "CVE-2024-4603",
"datePublished": "2024-05-16T15:21:20.050Z",
"dateReserved": "2024-05-07T11:44:02.196Z",
"dateUpdated": "2024-10-14T14:56:01.784Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
CVE-2024-8508 (GCVE-0-2024-8508)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2024-10-03 16:27
Modified
2024-11-14 21:02
Severity ?
VLAI Severity ?
EPSS score ?
CWE
- CWE-606 - Unchecked Input for Loop Condition
Summary
NLnet Labs Unbound up to and including version 1.21.0 contains a vulnerability when handling replies with very large RRsets that it needs to perform name compression for. Malicious upstreams responses with very large RRsets can cause Unbound to spend a considerable time applying name compression to downstream replies. This can lead to degraded performance and eventually denial of service in well orchestrated attacks. The vulnerability can be exploited by a malicious actor querying Unbound for the specially crafted contents of a malicious zone with very large RRsets. Before Unbound replies to the query it will try to apply name compression which was an unbounded operation that could lock the CPU until the whole packet was complete. Unbound version 1.21.1 introduces a hard limit on the number of name compression calculations it is willing to do per packet. Packets that need more compression will result in semi-compressed packets or truncated packets, even on TCP for huge messages, to avoid locking the CPU for long. This change should not affect normal DNS traffic.
References
| ► | URL | Tags | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||
Impacted products
| Vendor | Product | Version | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NLnet Labs | Unbound |
Version: 0 ≤ 1.21.0 |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"affected": [
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:nlnetlabs:unbound:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "unbound",
"vendor": "nlnetlabs",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "1.21.0",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2024-8508",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2024-10-03T17:11:45.971377Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-10-03T17:15:19.533Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
},
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-11-14T21:02:40.473Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/10/04/5"
},
{
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2024/11/msg00009.html"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "Unbound",
"vendor": "NLnet Labs",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "1.21.0",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Toshifumi Sakaguchi"
}
],
"datePublic": "2024-10-03T00:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "NLnet Labs Unbound up to and including version 1.21.0 contains a vulnerability when handling replies with very large RRsets that it needs to perform name compression for. Malicious upstreams responses with very large RRsets can cause Unbound to spend a considerable time applying name compression to downstream replies. This can lead to degraded performance and eventually denial of service in well orchestrated attacks. The vulnerability can be exploited by a malicious actor querying Unbound for the specially crafted contents of a malicious zone with very large RRsets. Before Unbound replies to the query it will try to apply name compression which was an unbounded operation that could lock the CPU until the whole packet was complete. Unbound version 1.21.1 introduces a hard limit on the number of name compression calculations it is willing to do per packet. Packets that need more compression will result in semi-compressed packets or truncated packets, even on TCP for huge messages, to avoid locking the CPU for long. This change should not affect normal DNS traffic."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"baseScore": 5.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS"
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-606",
"description": "CWE-606: Unchecked Input for Loop Condition",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-10-03T16:27:54.540Z",
"orgId": "206fc3a0-e175-490b-9eaa-a5738056c9f6",
"shortName": "NLnet Labs"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.nlnetlabs.nl/downloads/unbound/CVE-2024-8508.txt"
}
],
"solutions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "This issue is fixed in 1.21.1 and all later versions."
}
],
"timeline": [
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2024-07-25T00:00:00.000Z",
"value": "Issue reported by Toshifumi Sakaguchi"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2024-07-31T00:00:00.000Z",
"value": "Issue acknowledged by NLnet Labs; mitigation shared with Toshifumi Sakaguchi"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2024-08-01T00:00:00.000Z",
"value": "Mitigation confirmed by Toshifumi Sakaguchi"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2024-10-03T00:00:00.000Z",
"value": "Fixes released with Unbound 1.21.1"
}
],
"title": "Unbounded name compression could lead to Denial of Service"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "206fc3a0-e175-490b-9eaa-a5738056c9f6",
"assignerShortName": "NLnet Labs",
"cveId": "CVE-2024-8508",
"datePublished": "2024-10-03T16:27:54.540Z",
"dateReserved": "2024-09-06T11:47:59.783Z",
"dateUpdated": "2024-11-14T21:02:40.473Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
Mitigation
Phase: Implementation
Description:
- Do not use user-controlled data for loop conditions.
Mitigation
Phase: Implementation
Description:
- Perform input validation.
No CAPEC attack patterns related to this CWE.