CVE-2002-1623 (GCVE-0-2002-1623)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2005-03-26 05:00
Modified
2024-08-08 03:34
Severity ?
VLAI Severity ?
EPSS score ?
CWE
- n/a
Summary
The design of the Internet Key Exchange (IKE) protocol, when using Aggressive Mode for shared secret authentication, does not encrypt initiator or responder identities during negotiation, which may allow remote attackers to determine valid usernames by (1) monitoring responses before the password is supplied or (2) sniffing, as originally reported for FireWall-1 SecuRemote.
References
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-08T03:34:54.964Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "20020903 Check Point statement on use of IKE Aggressive Mode",
"tags": [
"mailing-list",
"x_refsource_FULLDISC",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/2002-September/001223.html"
},
{
"name": "20020911 RE: SecuRemote usernames can be guessed or sniffed using IKE",
"tags": [
"mailing-list",
"x_refsource_BUGTRAQ",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq\u0026m=103176164729351\u0026w=2"
},
{
"name": "5607",
"tags": [
"vdb-entry",
"x_refsource_BID",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/5607"
},
{
"name": "VU#886601",
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory",
"x_refsource_CERT-VN",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/886601"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://www.nta-monitor.com/news/checkpoint.htm"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://www.checkpoint.com/techsupport/alerts/ike.html"
},
{
"name": "20020903 SecuRemote usernames can be guessed or sniffed using IKE exchange",
"tags": [
"mailing-list",
"x_refsource_BUGTRAQ",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/290202"
},
{
"name": "20020905 RE: SecuRemote usernames can be guessed or sniffed using IKE exchange",
"tags": [
"mailing-list",
"x_refsource_BUGTRAQ",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq\u0026m=103124812629621\u0026w=2"
},
{
"name": "fw1-ike-username-enumeration(10034)",
"tags": [
"vdb-entry",
"x_refsource_XF",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/10034"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://www.securiteam.com/securitynews/5TP040U8AW.html"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "n/a",
"vendor": "n/a",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "n/a"
}
]
}
],
"datePublic": "2002-09-03T00:00:00",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "The design of the Internet Key Exchange (IKE) protocol, when using Aggressive Mode for shared secret authentication, does not encrypt initiator or responder identities during negotiation, which may allow remote attackers to determine valid usernames by (1) monitoring responses before the password is supplied or (2) sniffing, as originally reported for FireWall-1 SecuRemote."
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"description": "n/a",
"lang": "en",
"type": "text"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2017-07-10T14:57:01",
"orgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
"shortName": "mitre"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "20020903 Check Point statement on use of IKE Aggressive Mode",
"tags": [
"mailing-list",
"x_refsource_FULLDISC"
],
"url": "http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/2002-September/001223.html"
},
{
"name": "20020911 RE: SecuRemote usernames can be guessed or sniffed using IKE",
"tags": [
"mailing-list",
"x_refsource_BUGTRAQ"
],
"url": "http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq\u0026m=103176164729351\u0026w=2"
},
{
"name": "5607",
"tags": [
"vdb-entry",
"x_refsource_BID"
],
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/5607"
},
{
"name": "VU#886601",
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory",
"x_refsource_CERT-VN"
],
"url": "http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/886601"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "http://www.nta-monitor.com/news/checkpoint.htm"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "http://www.checkpoint.com/techsupport/alerts/ike.html"
},
{
"name": "20020903 SecuRemote usernames can be guessed or sniffed using IKE exchange",
"tags": [
"mailing-list",
"x_refsource_BUGTRAQ"
],
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/290202"
},
{
"name": "20020905 RE: SecuRemote usernames can be guessed or sniffed using IKE exchange",
"tags": [
"mailing-list",
"x_refsource_BUGTRAQ"
],
"url": "http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq\u0026m=103124812629621\u0026w=2"
},
{
"name": "fw1-ike-username-enumeration(10034)",
"tags": [
"vdb-entry",
"x_refsource_XF"
],
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/10034"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "http://www.securiteam.com/securitynews/5TP040U8AW.html"
}
],
"x_legacyV4Record": {
"CVE_data_meta": {
"ASSIGNER": "cve@mitre.org",
"ID": "CVE-2002-1623",
"STATE": "PUBLIC"
},
"affects": {
"vendor": {
"vendor_data": [
{
"product": {
"product_data": [
{
"product_name": "n/a",
"version": {
"version_data": [
{
"version_value": "n/a"
}
]
}
}
]
},
"vendor_name": "n/a"
}
]
}
},
"data_format": "MITRE",
"data_type": "CVE",
"data_version": "4.0",
"description": {
"description_data": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "The design of the Internet Key Exchange (IKE) protocol, when using Aggressive Mode for shared secret authentication, does not encrypt initiator or responder identities during negotiation, which may allow remote attackers to determine valid usernames by (1) monitoring responses before the password is supplied or (2) sniffing, as originally reported for FireWall-1 SecuRemote."
}
]
},
"problemtype": {
"problemtype_data": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "n/a"
}
]
}
]
},
"references": {
"reference_data": [
{
"name": "20020903 Check Point statement on use of IKE Aggressive Mode",
"refsource": "FULLDISC",
"url": "http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/2002-September/001223.html"
},
{
"name": "20020911 RE: SecuRemote usernames can be guessed or sniffed using IKE",
"refsource": "BUGTRAQ",
"url": "http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq\u0026m=103176164729351\u0026w=2"
},
{
"name": "5607",
"refsource": "BID",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/5607"
},
{
"name": "VU#886601",
"refsource": "CERT-VN",
"url": "http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/886601"
},
{
"name": "http://www.nta-monitor.com/news/checkpoint.htm",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "http://www.nta-monitor.com/news/checkpoint.htm"
},
{
"name": "http://www.checkpoint.com/techsupport/alerts/ike.html",
"refsource": "CONFIRM",
"url": "http://www.checkpoint.com/techsupport/alerts/ike.html"
},
{
"name": "20020903 SecuRemote usernames can be guessed or sniffed using IKE exchange",
"refsource": "BUGTRAQ",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/290202"
},
{
"name": "20020905 RE: SecuRemote usernames can be guessed or sniffed using IKE exchange",
"refsource": "BUGTRAQ",
"url": "http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq\u0026m=103124812629621\u0026w=2"
},
{
"name": "fw1-ike-username-enumeration(10034)",
"refsource": "XF",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/10034"
},
{
"name": "http://www.securiteam.com/securitynews/5TP040U8AW.html",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "http://www.securiteam.com/securitynews/5TP040U8AW.html"
}
]
}
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
"assignerShortName": "mitre",
"cveId": "CVE-2002-1623",
"datePublished": "2005-03-26T05:00:00",
"dateReserved": "2005-03-26T00:00:00",
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-08T03:34:54.964Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2002-1623\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"published\":\"2002-12-31T05:00:00.000\",\"lastModified\":\"2025-04-03T01:03:51.193\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Deferred\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"The design of the Internet Key Exchange (IKE) protocol, when using Aggressive Mode for shared secret authentication, does not encrypt initiator or responder identities during negotiation, which may allow remote attackers to determine valid usernames by (1) monitoring responses before the password is supplied or (2) sniffing, as originally reported for FireWall-1 SecuRemote.\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV2\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"2.0\",\"vectorString\":\"AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N\",\"baseScore\":5.0,\"accessVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"accessComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"authentication\":\"NONE\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"PARTIAL\",\"integrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"NONE\"},\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"exploitabilityScore\":10.0,\"impactScore\":2.9,\"acInsufInfo\":false,\"obtainAllPrivilege\":false,\"obtainUserPrivilege\":false,\"obtainOtherPrivilege\":false,\"userInteractionRequired\":false}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"NVD-CWE-Other\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:checkpoint:vpn-1_firewall-1:4.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"B0F8A14A-F252-4454-A4FB-BB924FE66085\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:checkpoint:vpn-1_firewall-1:4.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"32896C31-7AEA-42B3-94E1-05A3E8E61317\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/2002-September/001223.html\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\"},{\"url\":\"http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq\u0026m=103124812629621\u0026w=2\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\"},{\"url\":\"http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq\u0026m=103176164729351\u0026w=2\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\"},{\"url\":\"http://www.checkpoint.com/techsupport/alerts/ike.html\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\"},{\"url\":\"http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/886601\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"tags\":[\"US Government Resource\"]},{\"url\":\"http://www.nta-monitor.com/news/checkpoint.htm\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\"},{\"url\":\"http://www.securiteam.com/securitynews/5TP040U8AW.html\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"tags\":[\"Exploit\"]},{\"url\":\"http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/290202\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"tags\":[\"Exploit\"]},{\"url\":\"http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/5607\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\"},{\"url\":\"https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/10034\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\"},{\"url\":\"http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/2002-September/001223.html\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"},{\"url\":\"http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq\u0026m=103124812629621\u0026w=2\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"},{\"url\":\"http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq\u0026m=103176164729351\u0026w=2\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"},{\"url\":\"http://www.checkpoint.com/techsupport/alerts/ike.html\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"},{\"url\":\"http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/886601\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"US Government Resource\"]},{\"url\":\"http://www.nta-monitor.com/news/checkpoint.htm\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"},{\"url\":\"http://www.securiteam.com/securitynews/5TP040U8AW.html\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Exploit\"]},{\"url\":\"http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/290202\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Exploit\"]},{\"url\":\"http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/5607\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"},{\"url\":\"https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/10034\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"}]}}"
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…