CVE-2012-1163 (GCVE-0-2012-1163)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2012-07-12 20:00
Modified
2024-09-17 00:26
Severity ?
CWE
  • n/a
Summary
Integer overflow in the _zip_readcdir function in zip_open.c in libzip 0.10 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via the size and offset values for the central directory in a zip archive, which triggers "improper restrictions of operations within the bounds of a memory buffer" and an information leak.
References
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
n/a n/a Version: n/a
Show details on NVD website

To clipboard 

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2024-08-06T18:53:35.608Z",
          "orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
          "shortName": "CVE"
        },
        "references": [
          {
            "name": "[libzip-discuss] 20120320 libzip-0.10.1 security fix release",
            "tags": [
              "mailing-list",
              "x_refsource_MLIST",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://nih.at/listarchive/libzip-discuss/msg00252.html"
          },
          {
            "name": "[oss-security] 20120321 CVE-2012-1162 / -1163: Incorrect loop construct and numeric  overflow in libzip",
            "tags": [
              "mailing-list",
              "x_refsource_MLIST",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/03/21/2"
          },
          {
            "name": "MDVSA-2012:034",
            "tags": [
              "vendor-advisory",
              "x_refsource_MANDRIVA",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2012:034"
          },
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_refsource_CONFIRM",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://www.nih.at/libzip/NEWS.html"
          },
          {
            "name": "[oss-security] 20120329 Re: CVE-2012-1162 / -1163: Incorrect loop construct and numeric  overflow in libzip",
            "tags": [
              "mailing-list",
              "x_refsource_MLIST",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/03/29/11"
          },
          {
            "name": "GLSA-201203-23",
            "tags": [
              "vendor-advisory",
              "x_refsource_GENTOO",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://www.gentoo.org/security/en/glsa/glsa-201203-23.xml"
          }
        ],
        "title": "CVE Program Container"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "product": "n/a",
          "vendor": "n/a",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "n/a"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "Integer overflow in the _zip_readcdir function in zip_open.c in libzip 0.10 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via the size and offset values for the central directory in a zip archive, which triggers \"improper restrictions of operations within the bounds of a memory buffer\" and an information leak."
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "description": "n/a",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "text"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2012-07-12T20:00:00Z",
        "orgId": "53f830b8-0a3f-465b-8143-3b8a9948e749",
        "shortName": "redhat"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "name": "[libzip-discuss] 20120320 libzip-0.10.1 security fix release",
          "tags": [
            "mailing-list",
            "x_refsource_MLIST"
          ],
          "url": "http://nih.at/listarchive/libzip-discuss/msg00252.html"
        },
        {
          "name": "[oss-security] 20120321 CVE-2012-1162 / -1163: Incorrect loop construct and numeric  overflow in libzip",
          "tags": [
            "mailing-list",
            "x_refsource_MLIST"
          ],
          "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/03/21/2"
        },
        {
          "name": "MDVSA-2012:034",
          "tags": [
            "vendor-advisory",
            "x_refsource_MANDRIVA"
          ],
          "url": "http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2012:034"
        },
        {
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_CONFIRM"
          ],
          "url": "http://www.nih.at/libzip/NEWS.html"
        },
        {
          "name": "[oss-security] 20120329 Re: CVE-2012-1162 / -1163: Incorrect loop construct and numeric  overflow in libzip",
          "tags": [
            "mailing-list",
            "x_refsource_MLIST"
          ],
          "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/03/29/11"
        },
        {
          "name": "GLSA-201203-23",
          "tags": [
            "vendor-advisory",
            "x_refsource_GENTOO"
          ],
          "url": "http://www.gentoo.org/security/en/glsa/glsa-201203-23.xml"
        }
      ],
      "x_legacyV4Record": {
        "CVE_data_meta": {
          "ASSIGNER": "secalert@redhat.com",
          "ID": "CVE-2012-1163",
          "STATE": "PUBLIC"
        },
        "affects": {
          "vendor": {
            "vendor_data": [
              {
                "product": {
                  "product_data": [
                    {
                      "product_name": "n/a",
                      "version": {
                        "version_data": [
                          {
                            "version_value": "n/a"
                          }
                        ]
                      }
                    }
                  ]
                },
                "vendor_name": "n/a"
              }
            ]
          }
        },
        "data_format": "MITRE",
        "data_type": "CVE",
        "data_version": "4.0",
        "description": {
          "description_data": [
            {
              "lang": "eng",
              "value": "Integer overflow in the _zip_readcdir function in zip_open.c in libzip 0.10 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via the size and offset values for the central directory in a zip archive, which triggers \"improper restrictions of operations within the bounds of a memory buffer\" and an information leak."
            }
          ]
        },
        "problemtype": {
          "problemtype_data": [
            {
              "description": [
                {
                  "lang": "eng",
                  "value": "n/a"
                }
              ]
            }
          ]
        },
        "references": {
          "reference_data": [
            {
              "name": "[libzip-discuss] 20120320 libzip-0.10.1 security fix release",
              "refsource": "MLIST",
              "url": "http://nih.at/listarchive/libzip-discuss/msg00252.html"
            },
            {
              "name": "[oss-security] 20120321 CVE-2012-1162 / -1163: Incorrect loop construct and numeric  overflow in libzip",
              "refsource": "MLIST",
              "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/03/21/2"
            },
            {
              "name": "MDVSA-2012:034",
              "refsource": "MANDRIVA",
              "url": "http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2012:034"
            },
            {
              "name": "http://www.nih.at/libzip/NEWS.html",
              "refsource": "CONFIRM",
              "url": "http://www.nih.at/libzip/NEWS.html"
            },
            {
              "name": "[oss-security] 20120329 Re: CVE-2012-1162 / -1163: Incorrect loop construct and numeric  overflow in libzip",
              "refsource": "MLIST",
              "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/03/29/11"
            },
            {
              "name": "GLSA-201203-23",
              "refsource": "GENTOO",
              "url": "http://www.gentoo.org/security/en/glsa/glsa-201203-23.xml"
            }
          ]
        }
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "53f830b8-0a3f-465b-8143-3b8a9948e749",
    "assignerShortName": "redhat",
    "cveId": "CVE-2012-1163",
    "datePublished": "2012-07-12T20:00:00Z",
    "dateReserved": "2012-02-14T00:00:00Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2024-09-17T00:26:22.595Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.1",
  "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
    "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2012-1163\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"secalert@redhat.com\",\"published\":\"2012-07-12T20:55:15.000\",\"lastModified\":\"2025-04-11T00:51:21.963\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Deferred\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"Integer overflow in the _zip_readcdir function in zip_open.c in libzip 0.10 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via the size and offset values for the central directory in a zip archive, which triggers \\\"improper restrictions of operations within the bounds of a memory buffer\\\" and an information leak.\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"Un desbordamiento de entero en la funci\u00f3n _zip_readcdir en zip_open.c en libzip v0.10 permite a atacantes remotos ejecutar c\u00f3digo de su elecci\u00f3n a trav\u00e9s del tama\u00f1o y los valores de desplazamiento para el directorio central en un archivo zip, lo que provoca \\\"restricciones indebidas de las operaciones dentro de los l\u00edmites de un b\u00fafer de memoria\\\" y una fuga de informaci\u00f3n.\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV2\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"2.0\",\"vectorString\":\"AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P\",\"baseScore\":6.8,\"accessVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"accessComplexity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"authentication\":\"NONE\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"PARTIAL\",\"integrityImpact\":\"PARTIAL\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"PARTIAL\"},\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"exploitabilityScore\":8.6,\"impactScore\":6.4,\"acInsufInfo\":false,\"obtainAllPrivilege\":false,\"obtainUserPrivilege\":false,\"obtainOtherPrivilege\":false,\"userInteractionRequired\":true}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-189\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:nih:libzip:0.10:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"594609BD-8B2D-4716-9170-76A56057194B\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"http://nih.at/listarchive/libzip-discuss/msg00252.html\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\"},{\"url\":\"http://www.gentoo.org/security/en/glsa/glsa-201203-23.xml\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\"},{\"url\":\"http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2012:034\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\"},{\"url\":\"http://www.nih.at/libzip/NEWS.html\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\"},{\"url\":\"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/03/21/2\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\"},{\"url\":\"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/03/29/11\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\"},{\"url\":\"http://nih.at/listarchive/libzip-discuss/msg00252.html\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"},{\"url\":\"http://www.gentoo.org/security/en/glsa/glsa-201203-23.xml\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"},{\"url\":\"http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2012:034\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"},{\"url\":\"http://www.nih.at/libzip/NEWS.html\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"},{\"url\":\"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/03/21/2\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"},{\"url\":\"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/03/29/11\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"}]}}"
  }
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.