CVE-2019-10225 (GCVE-0-2019-10225)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2021-03-19 20:01
Modified
2024-08-04 22:17
Severity ?
VLAI Severity ?
EPSS score ?
CWE
Summary
A flaw was found in atomic-openshift of openshift-4.2 where the basic-user RABC role in OpenShift Container Platform doesn't sufficiently protect the GlusterFS StorageClass against leaking of the restuserkey. An attacker with basic-user permissions is able to obtain the value of restuserkey, and use it to authenticate to the GlusterFS REST service, gaining access to read, and modify files.
References
► | URL | Tags | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Impacted products
Vendor | Product | Version | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
n/a | atomic-openshift |
Version: atomic-openshift of openshift-4.2 |
{ "containers": { "adp": [ { "providerMetadata": { "dateUpdated": "2024-08-04T22:17:20.149Z", "orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", "shortName": "CVE" }, "references": [ { "tags": [ "x_refsource_MISC", "x_transferred" ], "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1743073" } ], "title": "CVE Program Container" } ], "cna": { "affected": [ { "product": "atomic-openshift", "vendor": "n/a", "versions": [ { "status": "affected", "version": "atomic-openshift of openshift-4.2" } ] } ], "descriptions": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "A flaw was found in atomic-openshift of openshift-4.2 where the basic-user RABC role in OpenShift Container Platform doesn\u0027t sufficiently protect the GlusterFS StorageClass against leaking of the restuserkey. An attacker with basic-user permissions is able to obtain the value of restuserkey, and use it to authenticate to the GlusterFS REST service, gaining access to read, and modify files." } ], "problemTypes": [ { "descriptions": [ { "cweId": "CWE-522", "description": "CWE-522", "lang": "en", "type": "CWE" } ] } ], "providerMetadata": { "dateUpdated": "2021-03-19T20:01:33", "orgId": "53f830b8-0a3f-465b-8143-3b8a9948e749", "shortName": "redhat" }, "references": [ { "tags": [ "x_refsource_MISC" ], "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1743073" } ] } }, "cveMetadata": { "assignerOrgId": "53f830b8-0a3f-465b-8143-3b8a9948e749", "assignerShortName": "redhat", "cveId": "CVE-2019-10225", "datePublished": "2021-03-19T20:01:33", "dateReserved": "2019-03-27T00:00:00", "dateUpdated": "2024-08-04T22:17:20.149Z", "state": "PUBLISHED" }, "dataType": "CVE_RECORD", "dataVersion": "5.1", "vulnerability-lookup:meta": { "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2019-10225\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"secalert@redhat.com\",\"published\":\"2021-03-19T21:15:11.807\",\"lastModified\":\"2024-11-21T04:18:41.873\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Modified\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"A flaw was found in atomic-openshift of openshift-4.2 where the basic-user RABC role in OpenShift Container Platform doesn\u0027t sufficiently protect the GlusterFS StorageClass against leaking of the restuserkey. An attacker with basic-user permissions is able to obtain the value of restuserkey, and use it to authenticate to the GlusterFS REST service, gaining access to read, and modify files.\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"Se encontr\u00f3 un fallo en atomic-openshift de openshift-4.2, donde el rol de usuario b\u00e1sico RABC en OpenShift Container Platform no protege suficientemente el GlusterFS StorageClass contra filtraciones del restuserkey.\u0026#xa0;Un atacante con permisos de usuario b\u00e1sico puede obtener el valor de restuserkey y usarlo para autenticarse en el servicio REST de GlusterFS, consiguiendo acceso para leer y modificar archivos\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV31\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L\",\"baseScore\":6.3,\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"LOW\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"LOW\",\"integrityImpact\":\"LOW\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"LOW\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":2.8,\"impactScore\":3.4}],\"cvssMetricV2\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"2.0\",\"vectorString\":\"AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P\",\"baseScore\":6.5,\"accessVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"accessComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"authentication\":\"SINGLE\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"PARTIAL\",\"integrityImpact\":\"PARTIAL\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"PARTIAL\"},\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"exploitabilityScore\":8.0,\"impactScore\":6.4,\"acInsufInfo\":false,\"obtainAllPrivilege\":false,\"obtainUserPrivilege\":false,\"obtainOtherPrivilege\":false,\"userInteractionRequired\":false}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-522\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:redhat:openshift:4.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"B1936DEA-6470-48CA-9FE1-B16448554ACE\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:redhat:openshift_container_platform:3.11:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"2F87326E-0B56-4356-A889-73D026DB1D4B\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:redhat:openshift_container_platform:4.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"932D137F-528B-4526-9A89-CD59FA1AB0FE\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1743073\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\",\"tags\":[\"Issue Tracking\",\"Mitigation\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1743073\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Issue Tracking\",\"Mitigation\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]}]}}" } }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…