CVE-2006-0642 (GCVE-0-2006-0642)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2006-02-10 11:00
Modified
2024-08-07 16:41
Severity ?
VLAI Severity ?
EPSS score ?
CWE
- n/a
Summary
Trend Micro ServerProtect 5.58, and possibly InterScan Messaging Security Suite and InterScan Web Security Suite, have a default configuration setting of "Do not scan compressed files when Extracted file count exceeds 500 files," which may be too low in certain circumstances, which allows remote attackers to bypass anti-virus checks by sending compressed archives containing many small files. NOTE: since this is related to a configuration setting that has an operational impact that might vary depending on the environment, and the product is claimed to report a message when the compressed file exceeds specified limits, perhaps this should not be included in CVE.
References
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-07T16:41:29.011Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://www.packetstormsecurity.org/0602-advisories/Bypass.pdf"
},
{
"name": "20060206 Fwd: Trend Micro ServerProtect version 5.58 can be easily circumvented via the mechanism that limits how many files to scan.",
"tags": [
"mailing-list",
"x_refsource_BUGTRAQ",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/424598/100/0/threaded"
},
{
"name": "20060203 Trend Micro ServerProtect version 5.58 can be easily circumvented via the mechanism that limits how many files to scan.",
"tags": [
"mailing-list",
"x_refsource_BUGTRAQ",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/423896/100/0/threaded"
},
{
"name": "16483",
"tags": [
"vdb-entry",
"x_refsource_BID",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/16483"
},
{
"name": "20060205 RE: Trend Micro ServerProtect version 5.58 can be easily circumvented via the mechanism that limits how many files to scan.",
"tags": [
"mailing-list",
"x_refsource_BUGTRAQ",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/424172/100/0/threaded"
},
{
"name": "serverprotect-file-scanning-bypass(24658)",
"tags": [
"vdb-entry",
"x_refsource_XF",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/24658"
},
{
"name": "20060203 Re: Trend Micro ServerProtect version 5.58 can be easily circumvented via the mechanism that limits how many files to scan.",
"tags": [
"mailing-list",
"x_refsource_BUGTRAQ",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/423914/100/0/threaded"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://www.packetstormsecurity.org/filedesc/Bypass.pdf.html"
},
{
"name": "20060203 Re: Trend Micro ServerProtect version 5.58 can be easily circumvented via the mechanism that limits how many files to scan.",
"tags": [
"mailing-list",
"x_refsource_BUGTRAQ",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/423913/100/0/threaded"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "n/a",
"vendor": "n/a",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "n/a"
}
]
}
],
"datePublic": "2006-02-02T00:00:00",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Trend Micro ServerProtect 5.58, and possibly InterScan Messaging Security Suite and InterScan Web Security Suite, have a default configuration setting of \"Do not scan compressed files when Extracted file count exceeds 500 files,\" which may be too low in certain circumstances, which allows remote attackers to bypass anti-virus checks by sending compressed archives containing many small files. NOTE: since this is related to a configuration setting that has an operational impact that might vary depending on the environment, and the product is claimed to report a message when the compressed file exceeds specified limits, perhaps this should not be included in CVE."
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"description": "n/a",
"lang": "en",
"type": "text"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2018-10-19T14:57:01",
"orgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
"shortName": "mitre"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "http://www.packetstormsecurity.org/0602-advisories/Bypass.pdf"
},
{
"name": "20060206 Fwd: Trend Micro ServerProtect version 5.58 can be easily circumvented via the mechanism that limits how many files to scan.",
"tags": [
"mailing-list",
"x_refsource_BUGTRAQ"
],
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/424598/100/0/threaded"
},
{
"name": "20060203 Trend Micro ServerProtect version 5.58 can be easily circumvented via the mechanism that limits how many files to scan.",
"tags": [
"mailing-list",
"x_refsource_BUGTRAQ"
],
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/423896/100/0/threaded"
},
{
"name": "16483",
"tags": [
"vdb-entry",
"x_refsource_BID"
],
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/16483"
},
{
"name": "20060205 RE: Trend Micro ServerProtect version 5.58 can be easily circumvented via the mechanism that limits how many files to scan.",
"tags": [
"mailing-list",
"x_refsource_BUGTRAQ"
],
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/424172/100/0/threaded"
},
{
"name": "serverprotect-file-scanning-bypass(24658)",
"tags": [
"vdb-entry",
"x_refsource_XF"
],
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/24658"
},
{
"name": "20060203 Re: Trend Micro ServerProtect version 5.58 can be easily circumvented via the mechanism that limits how many files to scan.",
"tags": [
"mailing-list",
"x_refsource_BUGTRAQ"
],
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/423914/100/0/threaded"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "http://www.packetstormsecurity.org/filedesc/Bypass.pdf.html"
},
{
"name": "20060203 Re: Trend Micro ServerProtect version 5.58 can be easily circumvented via the mechanism that limits how many files to scan.",
"tags": [
"mailing-list",
"x_refsource_BUGTRAQ"
],
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/423913/100/0/threaded"
}
],
"x_legacyV4Record": {
"CVE_data_meta": {
"ASSIGNER": "cve@mitre.org",
"ID": "CVE-2006-0642",
"STATE": "PUBLIC"
},
"affects": {
"vendor": {
"vendor_data": [
{
"product": {
"product_data": [
{
"product_name": "n/a",
"version": {
"version_data": [
{
"version_value": "n/a"
}
]
}
}
]
},
"vendor_name": "n/a"
}
]
}
},
"data_format": "MITRE",
"data_type": "CVE",
"data_version": "4.0",
"description": {
"description_data": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "Trend Micro ServerProtect 5.58, and possibly InterScan Messaging Security Suite and InterScan Web Security Suite, have a default configuration setting of \"Do not scan compressed files when Extracted file count exceeds 500 files,\" which may be too low in certain circumstances, which allows remote attackers to bypass anti-virus checks by sending compressed archives containing many small files. NOTE: since this is related to a configuration setting that has an operational impact that might vary depending on the environment, and the product is claimed to report a message when the compressed file exceeds specified limits, perhaps this should not be included in CVE."
}
]
},
"problemtype": {
"problemtype_data": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "n/a"
}
]
}
]
},
"references": {
"reference_data": [
{
"name": "http://www.packetstormsecurity.org/0602-advisories/Bypass.pdf",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "http://www.packetstormsecurity.org/0602-advisories/Bypass.pdf"
},
{
"name": "20060206 Fwd: Trend Micro ServerProtect version 5.58 can be easily circumvented via the mechanism that limits how many files to scan.",
"refsource": "BUGTRAQ",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/424598/100/0/threaded"
},
{
"name": "20060203 Trend Micro ServerProtect version 5.58 can be easily circumvented via the mechanism that limits how many files to scan.",
"refsource": "BUGTRAQ",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/423896/100/0/threaded"
},
{
"name": "16483",
"refsource": "BID",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/16483"
},
{
"name": "20060205 RE: Trend Micro ServerProtect version 5.58 can be easily circumvented via the mechanism that limits how many files to scan.",
"refsource": "BUGTRAQ",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/424172/100/0/threaded"
},
{
"name": "serverprotect-file-scanning-bypass(24658)",
"refsource": "XF",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/24658"
},
{
"name": "20060203 Re: Trend Micro ServerProtect version 5.58 can be easily circumvented via the mechanism that limits how many files to scan.",
"refsource": "BUGTRAQ",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/423914/100/0/threaded"
},
{
"name": "http://www.packetstormsecurity.org/filedesc/Bypass.pdf.html",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "http://www.packetstormsecurity.org/filedesc/Bypass.pdf.html"
},
{
"name": "20060203 Re: Trend Micro ServerProtect version 5.58 can be easily circumvented via the mechanism that limits how many files to scan.",
"refsource": "BUGTRAQ",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/423913/100/0/threaded"
}
]
}
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
"assignerShortName": "mitre",
"cveId": "CVE-2006-0642",
"datePublished": "2006-02-10T11:00:00",
"dateReserved": "2006-02-10T00:00:00",
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-07T16:41:29.011Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2006-0642\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"published\":\"2006-02-10T11:02:00.000\",\"lastModified\":\"2025-04-03T01:03:51.193\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Deferred\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"Trend Micro ServerProtect 5.58, and possibly InterScan Messaging Security Suite and InterScan Web Security Suite, have a default configuration setting of \\\"Do not scan compressed files when Extracted file count exceeds 500 files,\\\" which may be too low in certain circumstances, which allows remote attackers to bypass anti-virus checks by sending compressed archives containing many small files. NOTE: since this is related to a configuration setting that has an operational impact that might vary depending on the environment, and the product is claimed to report a message when the compressed file exceeds specified limits, perhaps this should not be included in CVE.\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV2\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"2.0\",\"vectorString\":\"AV:N/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P\",\"baseScore\":5.1,\"accessVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"accessComplexity\":\"HIGH\",\"authentication\":\"NONE\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"PARTIAL\",\"integrityImpact\":\"PARTIAL\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"PARTIAL\"},\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"exploitabilityScore\":4.9,\"impactScore\":6.4,\"acInsufInfo\":false,\"obtainAllPrivilege\":false,\"obtainUserPrivilege\":false,\"obtainOtherPrivilege\":false,\"userInteractionRequired\":true}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"NVD-CWE-Other\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:trend_micro:interscan_messaging_security_suite:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"42ECD45D-EB0D-4B7B-A2F6-529EA9BD3746\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:trend_micro:interscan_web_security_suite:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"459E1A3E-1EF9-4544-B2F9-28654A2D565E\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:trend_micro:serverprotect:5.58:*:emc:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"1364240C-2070-4CEA-BAE9-E94EAFFBBF1D\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"http://www.packetstormsecurity.org/0602-advisories/Bypass.pdf\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"tags\":[\"Vendor Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"http://www.packetstormsecurity.org/filedesc/Bypass.pdf.html\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"tags\":[\"Vendor Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/423896/100/0/threaded\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\"},{\"url\":\"http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/423913/100/0/threaded\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\"},{\"url\":\"http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/423914/100/0/threaded\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\"},{\"url\":\"http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/424172/100/0/threaded\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\"},{\"url\":\"http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/424598/100/0/threaded\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\"},{\"url\":\"http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/16483\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\"},{\"url\":\"https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/24658\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\"},{\"url\":\"http://www.packetstormsecurity.org/0602-advisories/Bypass.pdf\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Vendor Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"http://www.packetstormsecurity.org/filedesc/Bypass.pdf.html\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Vendor Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/423896/100/0/threaded\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"},{\"url\":\"http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/423913/100/0/threaded\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"},{\"url\":\"http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/423914/100/0/threaded\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"},{\"url\":\"http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/424172/100/0/threaded\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"},{\"url\":\"http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/424598/100/0/threaded\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"},{\"url\":\"http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/16483\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"},{\"url\":\"https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/24658\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"}]}}"
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…