CVE-2012-2658 (GCVE-0-2012-2658)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2012-08-31 00:00
Modified
2024-08-06 19:42
Severity ?
VLAI Severity ?
EPSS score ?
CWE
- n/a
Summary
Buffer overflow in the SQLDriverConnect function in unixODBC 2.3.1 allows local users to cause a denial of service (crash) via a long string in the DRIVER option. NOTE: this issue might not be a vulnerability, since the ability to set this option typically implies that the attacker already has legitimate access to cause a DoS or execute code, and therefore the issue would not cross privilege boundaries. There may be limited attack scenarios if isql command-line options are exposed to an attacker, although it seems likely that other, more serious issues would also be exposed, and this issue might not cross privilege boundaries in that context.
References
{ "containers": { "adp": [ { "providerMetadata": { "dateUpdated": "2024-08-06T19:42:31.612Z", "orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", "shortName": "CVE" }, "references": [ { "name": "82460", "tags": [ "vdb-entry", "x_transferred" ], "url": "http://www.osvdb.org/82460" }, { "name": "unixodbc-sdc-bo(75940)", "tags": [ "vdb-entry", "x_transferred" ], "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/75940" }, { "name": "[oss-security] 20120605 Re: CVE id request: Multiple buffer overflow in unixODBC", "tags": [ "mailing-list", "x_transferred" ], "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/06/06/3" }, { "name": "[oss-security] 20120530 Re: CVE id request: Multiple buffer overflow in unixODBC", "tags": [ "mailing-list", "x_transferred" ], "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/05/30/7" }, { "name": "[oss-security] 20120531 Re: CVE id request: Multiple buffer overflow in unixODBC", "tags": [ "mailing-list", "x_transferred" ], "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/05/31/2" }, { "name": "53712", "tags": [ "vdb-entry", "x_transferred" ], "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/53712" }, { "name": "[oss-security] 20120529 Re: CVE id request: Multiple buffer overflow in unixODBC", "tags": [ "mailing-list", "x_transferred" ], "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/05/29/10" }, { "name": "[oss-security] 20120529 CVE id request: Multiple buffer overflow in unixODBC", "tags": [ "mailing-list", "x_transferred" ], "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/05/29/7" } ], "title": "CVE Program Container" } ], "cna": { "affected": [ { "product": "n/a", "vendor": "n/a", "versions": [ { "status": "affected", "version": "n/a" } ] } ], "datePublic": "2012-05-29T00:00:00", "descriptions": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "Buffer overflow in the SQLDriverConnect function in unixODBC 2.3.1 allows local users to cause a denial of service (crash) via a long string in the DRIVER option. NOTE: this issue might not be a vulnerability, since the ability to set this option typically implies that the attacker already has legitimate access to cause a DoS or execute code, and therefore the issue would not cross privilege boundaries. There may be limited attack scenarios if isql command-line options are exposed to an attacker, although it seems likely that other, more serious issues would also be exposed, and this issue might not cross privilege boundaries in that context." } ], "problemTypes": [ { "descriptions": [ { "description": "n/a", "lang": "en", "type": "text" } ] } ], "providerMetadata": { "dateUpdated": "2023-02-12T00:00:00", "orgId": "53f830b8-0a3f-465b-8143-3b8a9948e749", "shortName": "redhat" }, "references": [ { "name": "82460", "tags": [ "vdb-entry" ], "url": "http://www.osvdb.org/82460" }, { "name": "unixodbc-sdc-bo(75940)", "tags": [ "vdb-entry" ], "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/75940" }, { "name": "[oss-security] 20120605 Re: CVE id request: Multiple buffer overflow in unixODBC", "tags": [ "mailing-list" ], "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/06/06/3" }, { "name": "[oss-security] 20120530 Re: CVE id request: Multiple buffer overflow in unixODBC", "tags": [ "mailing-list" ], "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/05/30/7" }, { "name": "[oss-security] 20120531 Re: CVE id request: Multiple buffer overflow in unixODBC", "tags": [ "mailing-list" ], "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/05/31/2" }, { "name": "53712", "tags": [ "vdb-entry" ], "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/53712" }, { "name": "[oss-security] 20120529 Re: CVE id request: Multiple buffer overflow in unixODBC", "tags": [ "mailing-list" ], "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/05/29/10" }, { "name": "[oss-security] 20120529 CVE id request: Multiple buffer overflow in unixODBC", "tags": [ "mailing-list" ], "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/05/29/7" } ], "tags": [ "disputed" ] } }, "cveMetadata": { "assignerOrgId": "53f830b8-0a3f-465b-8143-3b8a9948e749", "assignerShortName": "redhat", "cveId": "CVE-2012-2658", "datePublished": "2012-08-31T00:00:00", "dateReserved": "2012-05-14T00:00:00", "dateUpdated": "2024-08-06T19:42:31.612Z", "state": "PUBLISHED" }, "dataType": "CVE_RECORD", "dataVersion": "5.1", "vulnerability-lookup:meta": { "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2012-2658\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"secalert@redhat.com\",\"published\":\"2012-08-31T18:55:01.137\",\"lastModified\":\"2025-04-11T00:51:21.963\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Deferred\",\"cveTags\":[{\"sourceIdentifier\":\"secalert@redhat.com\",\"tags\":[\"disputed\"]}],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"Buffer overflow in the SQLDriverConnect function in unixODBC 2.3.1 allows local users to cause a denial of service (crash) via a long string in the DRIVER option. NOTE: this issue might not be a vulnerability, since the ability to set this option typically implies that the attacker already has legitimate access to cause a DoS or execute code, and therefore the issue would not cross privilege boundaries. There may be limited attack scenarios if isql command-line options are exposed to an attacker, although it seems likely that other, more serious issues would also be exposed, and this issue might not cross privilege boundaries in that context.\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"** EN DISPUTA ** Desbordamiento de b\u00fafer en la funci\u00f3n SQLDriverConnect en unixODBC v2.3.1 permite a usuarios locales provocar una denegaci\u00f3n de servicio (ca\u00edda de la aplicaci\u00f3n) a trav\u00e9s de una cadena larga en la opci\u00f3n \u0027DRIVER\u0027. NOTA: este problema puede no ser una vulnerabilidad, ya que la capacidad de establecer esta opci\u00f3n suele implicar que el atacante ya tiene acceso leg\u00edtimo para causar una denegaci\u00f3n de servicio o ejecutar c\u00f3digo, y por lo tanto el problema no ser\u00eda con los privilegios. Puede haber escenarios limitados de ataque si las opciones de la l\u00ednea de comandos isql est\u00e1n expuestos a un atacante, aunque parece probable que otros asuntos m\u00e1s graves tambi\u00e9n se ver\u00edan expuestos, y este problema no puede cruzar los l\u00edmites de privilegio en ese contexto.\\r\\n\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV2\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"2.0\",\"vectorString\":\"AV:L/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P\",\"baseScore\":2.1,\"accessVector\":\"LOCAL\",\"accessComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"authentication\":\"NONE\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"integrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"PARTIAL\"},\"baseSeverity\":\"LOW\",\"exploitabilityScore\":3.9,\"impactScore\":2.9,\"acInsufInfo\":false,\"obtainAllPrivilege\":false,\"obtainUserPrivilege\":false,\"obtainOtherPrivilege\":false,\"userInteractionRequired\":false}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-119\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:unixodbc:unixodbc:2.3.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"4F534A85-7BFF-43BB-8CC1-F7D197AD2343\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/05/29/10\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\"},{\"url\":\"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/05/29/7\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\"},{\"url\":\"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/05/30/7\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\"},{\"url\":\"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/05/31/2\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\"},{\"url\":\"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/06/06/3\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\"},{\"url\":\"http://www.osvdb.org/82460\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\"},{\"url\":\"http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/53712\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\"},{\"url\":\"https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/75940\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\"},{\"url\":\"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/05/29/10\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"},{\"url\":\"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/05/29/7\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"},{\"url\":\"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/05/30/7\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"},{\"url\":\"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/05/31/2\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"},{\"url\":\"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/06/06/3\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"},{\"url\":\"http://www.osvdb.org/82460\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"},{\"url\":\"http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/53712\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"},{\"url\":\"https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/75940\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"}]}}" } }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…