CVE-2017-16129 (GCVE-0-2017-16129)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2018-06-07 02:00
Modified
2024-09-16 19:04
Severity ?
VLAI Severity ?
EPSS score ?
CWE
- CWE-409 - Improper Handling of Highly Compressed Data (Data Amplification) ()
Summary
The HTTP client module superagent is vulnerable to ZIP bomb attacks. In a ZIP bomb attack, the HTTP server replies with a compressed response that becomes several magnitudes larger once uncompressed. If a client does not take special care when processing such responses, it may result in excessive CPU and/or memory consumption. An attacker might exploit such a weakness for a DoS attack. To exploit this the attacker must control the location (URL) that superagent makes a request to.
References
► | URL | Tags | |||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Impacted products
Vendor | Product | Version | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
HackerOne | superagent node module |
Version: <3.7.0 |
{ "containers": { "adp": [ { "providerMetadata": { "dateUpdated": "2024-08-05T20:13:07.246Z", "orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", "shortName": "CVE" }, "references": [ { "tags": [ "x_refsource_MISC", "x_transferred" ], "url": "https://nodesecurity.io/advisories/479" }, { "tags": [ "x_refsource_MISC", "x_transferred" ], "url": "https://github.com/visionmedia/superagent/issues/1259" } ], "title": "CVE Program Container" } ], "cna": { "affected": [ { "product": "superagent node module", "vendor": "HackerOne", "versions": [ { "status": "affected", "version": "\u003c3.7.0" } ] } ], "datePublic": "2018-04-26T00:00:00", "descriptions": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "The HTTP client module superagent is vulnerable to ZIP bomb attacks. In a ZIP bomb attack, the HTTP server replies with a compressed response that becomes several magnitudes larger once uncompressed. If a client does not take special care when processing such responses, it may result in excessive CPU and/or memory consumption. An attacker might exploit such a weakness for a DoS attack. To exploit this the attacker must control the location (URL) that superagent makes a request to." } ], "problemTypes": [ { "descriptions": [ { "cweId": "CWE-409", "description": "Improper Handling of Highly Compressed Data (Data Amplification) (CWE-409)", "lang": "en", "type": "CWE" } ] } ], "providerMetadata": { "dateUpdated": "2018-06-07T01:57:01", "orgId": "36234546-b8fa-4601-9d6f-f4e334aa8ea1", "shortName": "hackerone" }, "references": [ { "tags": [ "x_refsource_MISC" ], "url": "https://nodesecurity.io/advisories/479" }, { "tags": [ "x_refsource_MISC" ], "url": "https://github.com/visionmedia/superagent/issues/1259" } ], "x_legacyV4Record": { "CVE_data_meta": { "ASSIGNER": "support@hackerone.com", "DATE_PUBLIC": "2018-04-26T00:00:00", "ID": "CVE-2017-16129", "STATE": "PUBLIC" }, "affects": { "vendor": { "vendor_data": [ { "product": { "product_data": [ { "product_name": "superagent node module", "version": { "version_data": [ { "version_value": "\u003c3.7.0" } ] } } ] }, "vendor_name": "HackerOne" } ] } }, "data_format": "MITRE", "data_type": "CVE", "data_version": "4.0", "description": { "description_data": [ { "lang": "eng", "value": "The HTTP client module superagent is vulnerable to ZIP bomb attacks. In a ZIP bomb attack, the HTTP server replies with a compressed response that becomes several magnitudes larger once uncompressed. If a client does not take special care when processing such responses, it may result in excessive CPU and/or memory consumption. An attacker might exploit such a weakness for a DoS attack. To exploit this the attacker must control the location (URL) that superagent makes a request to." } ] }, "problemtype": { "problemtype_data": [ { "description": [ { "lang": "eng", "value": "Improper Handling of Highly Compressed Data (Data Amplification) (CWE-409)" } ] } ] }, "references": { "reference_data": [ { "name": "https://nodesecurity.io/advisories/479", "refsource": "MISC", "url": "https://nodesecurity.io/advisories/479" }, { "name": "https://github.com/visionmedia/superagent/issues/1259", "refsource": "MISC", "url": "https://github.com/visionmedia/superagent/issues/1259" } ] } } } }, "cveMetadata": { "assignerOrgId": "36234546-b8fa-4601-9d6f-f4e334aa8ea1", "assignerShortName": "hackerone", "cveId": "CVE-2017-16129", "datePublished": "2018-06-07T02:00:00Z", "dateReserved": "2017-10-29T00:00:00", "dateUpdated": "2024-09-16T19:04:07.190Z", "state": "PUBLISHED" }, "dataType": "CVE_RECORD", "dataVersion": "5.1", "vulnerability-lookup:meta": { "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2017-16129\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"support@hackerone.com\",\"published\":\"2018-06-07T02:29:03.457\",\"lastModified\":\"2024-11-21T03:15:52.757\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Modified\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"The HTTP client module superagent is vulnerable to ZIP bomb attacks. In a ZIP bomb attack, the HTTP server replies with a compressed response that becomes several magnitudes larger once uncompressed. If a client does not take special care when processing such responses, it may result in excessive CPU and/or memory consumption. An attacker might exploit such a weakness for a DoS attack. To exploit this the attacker must control the location (URL) that superagent makes a request to.\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"El m\u00f3dulo HTTP del cliente superagent es vulnerable a ataques de bomba ZIP. En un ataque de bomba ZIP, el servidor HTTP responde con una respuesta comprimida que se agranda significativamente una vez descomprimida. Si un cliente no toma las suficientes precauciones al procesar tales respuestas, podr\u00eda resultar en un consumo excesivo de CPU y/o memoria. Un atacante podr\u00eda explotar una debilidad como esa para un ataque DoS. Para explotarla, el atacante debe controlar la ubicaci\u00f3n (URL) a la que superagent realiza una petici\u00f3n.\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV30\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.0\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H\",\"baseScore\":5.9,\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"HIGH\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"integrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"HIGH\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":2.2,\"impactScore\":3.6}],\"cvssMetricV2\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"2.0\",\"vectorString\":\"AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:C\",\"baseScore\":7.1,\"accessVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"accessComplexity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"authentication\":\"NONE\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"integrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"COMPLETE\"},\"baseSeverity\":\"HIGH\",\"exploitabilityScore\":8.6,\"impactScore\":6.9,\"acInsufInfo\":false,\"obtainAllPrivilege\":false,\"obtainUserPrivilege\":false,\"obtainOtherPrivilege\":false,\"userInteractionRequired\":false}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"support@hackerone.com\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-409\"}]},{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-400\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:superagent_project:superagent:*:*:*:*:*:node.js:*:*\",\"versionEndExcluding\":\"3.7.0\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"8A86D4C2-09BE-45F0-985E-8AB163C926E0\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://github.com/visionmedia/superagent/issues/1259\",\"source\":\"support@hackerone.com\",\"tags\":[\"Issue Tracking\",\"Patch\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://nodesecurity.io/advisories/479\",\"source\":\"support@hackerone.com\",\"tags\":[\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/visionmedia/superagent/issues/1259\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Issue Tracking\",\"Patch\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://nodesecurity.io/advisories/479\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Third Party Advisory\"]}]}}" } }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…