CVE-2020-27217 (GCVE-0-2020-27217)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2020-11-13 19:30
Modified
2024-08-04 16:11
Severity ?
VLAI Severity ?
EPSS score ?
CWE
- CWE-1284 - Improper Validation of Specified Quantity in Input
Summary
In Eclipse Hono version 1.3.0 and 1.4.0 the AMQP protocol adapter does not verify the size of AMQP messages received from devices. In particular, a device may send messages that are bigger than the max-message-size that the protocol adapter has indicated during link establishment. While the AMQP 1.0 protocol explicitly disallows a peer to send such messages, a hand crafted AMQP 1.0 client could exploit this behavior in order to send a message of unlimited size to the adapter, eventually causing the adapter to fail with an out of memory exception.
References
► | URL | Tags | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Impacted products
Vendor | Product | Version | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
The Eclipse Foundation | Eclipse Hono |
Version: 1.3.0 Version: 1.4.0 |
{ "containers": { "adp": [ { "providerMetadata": { "dateUpdated": "2024-08-04T16:11:35.953Z", "orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", "shortName": "CVE" }, "references": [ { "tags": [ "x_refsource_CONFIRM", "x_transferred" ], "url": "https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=567068" } ], "title": "CVE Program Container" } ], "cna": { "affected": [ { "product": "Eclipse Hono", "vendor": "The Eclipse Foundation", "versions": [ { "status": "affected", "version": "1.3.0" }, { "status": "affected", "version": "1.4.0" } ] } ], "descriptions": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "In Eclipse Hono version 1.3.0 and 1.4.0 the AMQP protocol adapter does not verify the size of AMQP messages received from devices. In particular, a device may send messages that are bigger than the max-message-size that the protocol adapter has indicated during link establishment. While the AMQP 1.0 protocol explicitly disallows a peer to send such messages, a hand crafted AMQP 1.0 client could exploit this behavior in order to send a message of unlimited size to the adapter, eventually causing the adapter to fail with an out of memory exception." } ], "problemTypes": [ { "descriptions": [ { "cweId": "CWE-1284", "description": "CWE-1284: Improper Validation of Specified Quantity in Input", "lang": "en", "type": "CWE" } ] } ], "providerMetadata": { "dateUpdated": "2020-11-13T19:30:16", "orgId": "e51fbebd-6053-4e49-959f-1b94eeb69a2c", "shortName": "eclipse" }, "references": [ { "tags": [ "x_refsource_CONFIRM" ], "url": "https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=567068" } ], "x_legacyV4Record": { "CVE_data_meta": { "ASSIGNER": "security@eclipse.org", "ID": "CVE-2020-27217", "STATE": "PUBLIC" }, "affects": { "vendor": { "vendor_data": [ { "product": { "product_data": [ { "product_name": "Eclipse Hono", "version": { "version_data": [ { "version_value": "1.3.0" }, { "version_value": "1.4.0" } ] } } ] }, "vendor_name": "The Eclipse Foundation" } ] } }, "data_format": "MITRE", "data_type": "CVE", "data_version": "4.0", "description": { "description_data": [ { "lang": "eng", "value": "In Eclipse Hono version 1.3.0 and 1.4.0 the AMQP protocol adapter does not verify the size of AMQP messages received from devices. In particular, a device may send messages that are bigger than the max-message-size that the protocol adapter has indicated during link establishment. While the AMQP 1.0 protocol explicitly disallows a peer to send such messages, a hand crafted AMQP 1.0 client could exploit this behavior in order to send a message of unlimited size to the adapter, eventually causing the adapter to fail with an out of memory exception." } ] }, "problemtype": { "problemtype_data": [ { "description": [ { "lang": "eng", "value": "CWE-1284: Improper Validation of Specified Quantity in Input" } ] } ] }, "references": { "reference_data": [ { "name": "https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=567068", "refsource": "CONFIRM", "url": "https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=567068" } ] } } } }, "cveMetadata": { "assignerOrgId": "e51fbebd-6053-4e49-959f-1b94eeb69a2c", "assignerShortName": "eclipse", "cveId": "CVE-2020-27217", "datePublished": "2020-11-13T19:30:16", "dateReserved": "2020-10-19T00:00:00", "dateUpdated": "2024-08-04T16:11:35.953Z", "state": "PUBLISHED" }, "dataType": "CVE_RECORD", "dataVersion": "5.1", "vulnerability-lookup:meta": { "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2020-27217\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"emo@eclipse.org\",\"published\":\"2020-11-13T20:15:16.270\",\"lastModified\":\"2024-11-21T05:20:52.770\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Modified\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"In Eclipse Hono version 1.3.0 and 1.4.0 the AMQP protocol adapter does not verify the size of AMQP messages received from devices. In particular, a device may send messages that are bigger than the max-message-size that the protocol adapter has indicated during link establishment. While the AMQP 1.0 protocol explicitly disallows a peer to send such messages, a hand crafted AMQP 1.0 client could exploit this behavior in order to send a message of unlimited size to the adapter, eventually causing the adapter to fail with an out of memory exception.\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"En Eclipse Hono versiones 1.3.0 y 1.4.0, el adaptador de protocolo AMQP no verifica el tama\u00f1o de los mensajes AMQP recibidos desde dispositivos.\u0026#xa0;En particular, un dispositivo puede enviar mensajes que son m\u00e1s grandes que el tama\u00f1o m\u00e1ximo de mensaje que el adaptador de protocolo ha indicado durante el establecimiento del enlace.\u0026#xa0;Si bien el protocolo AMQP versi\u00f3n 1.0 expl\u00edcitamente no permite a un peer enviar dichos mensajes, un cliente AMQP versi\u00f3n 1.0 dise\u00f1ado podr\u00eda explotar este comportamiento a fin de enviar un mensaje de tama\u00f1o ilimitado hacia el adaptador, lo que eventualmente causa a un adaptador un fallo con una excepci\u00f3n de falta de memoria\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV31\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H\",\"baseScore\":7.5,\"baseSeverity\":\"HIGH\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"integrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"HIGH\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":3.9,\"impactScore\":3.6}],\"cvssMetricV2\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"2.0\",\"vectorString\":\"AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P\",\"baseScore\":5.0,\"accessVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"accessComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"authentication\":\"NONE\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"integrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"PARTIAL\"},\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"exploitabilityScore\":10.0,\"impactScore\":2.9,\"acInsufInfo\":false,\"obtainAllPrivilege\":false,\"obtainUserPrivilege\":false,\"obtainOtherPrivilege\":false,\"userInteractionRequired\":false}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"emo@eclipse.org\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-1284\"}]},{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"NVD-CWE-noinfo\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:eclipse:hono:1.3.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"E0069162-7F28-4FA8-9ECC-C6F884F3A33E\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:eclipse:hono:1.4.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"A88017C9-1C6D-452D-93E5-2F762C78A586\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=567068\",\"source\":\"emo@eclipse.org\",\"tags\":[\"Issue Tracking\",\"Vendor Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=567068\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Issue Tracking\",\"Vendor Advisory\"]}]}}" } }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…