CVE-2024-58060 (GCVE-0-2024-58060)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2025-03-06 15:54
Modified
2025-05-04 10:09
Severity ?
7.8 (High) - CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bpf: Reject struct_ops registration that uses module ptr and the module btf_id is missing There is a UAF report in the bpf_struct_ops when CONFIG_MODULES=n. In particular, the report is on tcp_congestion_ops that has a "struct module *owner" member. For struct_ops that has a "struct module *owner" member, it can be extended either by the regular kernel module or by the bpf_struct_ops. bpf_try_module_get() will be used to do the refcounting and different refcount is done based on the owner pointer. When CONFIG_MODULES=n, the btf_id of the "struct module" is missing: WARN: resolve_btfids: unresolved symbol module Thus, the bpf_try_module_get() cannot do the correct refcounting. Not all subsystem's struct_ops requires the "struct module *owner" member. e.g. the recent sched_ext_ops. This patch is to disable bpf_struct_ops registration if the struct_ops has the "struct module *" member and the "struct module" btf_id is missing. The btf_type_is_fwd() helper is moved to the btf.h header file for this test. This has happened since the beginning of bpf_struct_ops which has gone through many changes. The Fixes tag is set to a recent commit that this patch can apply cleanly. Considering CONFIG_MODULES=n is not common and the age of the issue, targeting for bpf-next also.
References
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
Linux Linux Version: 1611603537a4b88cec7993f32b70c03113801a46
Version: 1611603537a4b88cec7993f32b70c03113801a46
Version: 1611603537a4b88cec7993f32b70c03113801a46
 Create a notification for this product.
Show details on NVD website

To clipboard 

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "cvssV3_1": {
              "attackComplexity": "LOW",
              "attackVector": "LOCAL",
              "availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
              "baseScore": 7.8,
              "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
              "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
              "integrityImpact": "HIGH",
              "privilegesRequired": "LOW",
              "scope": "UNCHANGED",
              "userInteraction": "NONE",
              "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
              "version": "3.1"
            }
          },
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2024-58060",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "none"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "no"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "total"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2025-03-06T16:04:02.766596Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "problemTypes": [
          {
            "descriptions": [
              {
                "cweId": "CWE-416",
                "description": "CWE-416 Use After Free",
                "lang": "en",
                "type": "CWE"
              }
            ]
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2025-03-06T16:04:30.923Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "product": "Linux",
          "programFiles": [
            "include/linux/btf.h",
            "kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c",
            "kernel/bpf/btf.c"
          ],
          "repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
          "vendor": "Linux",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThan": "b777b14c2a4a4e2322daf8e8ffd42d2b88831b17",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "1611603537a4b88cec7993f32b70c03113801a46",
              "versionType": "git"
            },
            {
              "lessThan": "2324fb4e92092837ee278fdd8d60c48ee1a619ce",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "1611603537a4b88cec7993f32b70c03113801a46",
              "versionType": "git"
            },
            {
              "lessThan": "96ea081ed52bf077cad6d00153b6fba68e510767",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "1611603537a4b88cec7993f32b70c03113801a46",
              "versionType": "git"
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "defaultStatus": "affected",
          "product": "Linux",
          "programFiles": [
            "include/linux/btf.h",
            "kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c",
            "kernel/bpf/btf.c"
          ],
          "repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
          "vendor": "Linux",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "6.9"
            },
            {
              "lessThan": "6.9",
              "status": "unaffected",
              "version": "0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            },
            {
              "lessThanOrEqual": "6.12.*",
              "status": "unaffected",
              "version": "6.12.13",
              "versionType": "semver"
            },
            {
              "lessThanOrEqual": "6.13.*",
              "status": "unaffected",
              "version": "6.13.2",
              "versionType": "semver"
            },
            {
              "lessThanOrEqual": "*",
              "status": "unaffected",
              "version": "6.14",
              "versionType": "original_commit_for_fix"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "cpeApplicability": [
        {
          "nodes": [
            {
              "cpeMatch": [
                {
                  "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
                  "versionEndExcluding": "6.12.13",
                  "versionStartIncluding": "6.9",
                  "vulnerable": true
                },
                {
                  "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
                  "versionEndExcluding": "6.13.2",
                  "versionStartIncluding": "6.9",
                  "vulnerable": true
                },
                {
                  "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
                  "versionEndExcluding": "6.14",
                  "versionStartIncluding": "6.9",
                  "vulnerable": true
                }
              ],
              "negate": false,
              "operator": "OR"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nbpf: Reject struct_ops registration that uses module ptr and the module btf_id is missing\n\nThere is a UAF report in the bpf_struct_ops when CONFIG_MODULES=n.\nIn particular, the report is on tcp_congestion_ops that has\na \"struct module *owner\" member.\n\nFor struct_ops that has a \"struct module *owner\" member,\nit can be extended either by the regular kernel module or\nby the bpf_struct_ops. bpf_try_module_get() will be used\nto do the refcounting and different refcount is done\nbased on the owner pointer. When CONFIG_MODULES=n,\nthe btf_id of the \"struct module\" is missing:\n\nWARN: resolve_btfids: unresolved symbol module\n\nThus, the bpf_try_module_get() cannot do the correct refcounting.\n\nNot all subsystem\u0027s struct_ops requires the \"struct module *owner\" member.\ne.g. the recent sched_ext_ops.\n\nThis patch is to disable bpf_struct_ops registration if\nthe struct_ops has the \"struct module *\" member and the\n\"struct module\" btf_id is missing. The btf_type_is_fwd() helper\nis moved to the btf.h header file for this test.\n\nThis has happened since the beginning of bpf_struct_ops which has gone\nthrough many changes. The Fixes tag is set to a recent commit that this\npatch can apply cleanly. Considering CONFIG_MODULES=n is not\ncommon and the age of the issue, targeting for bpf-next also."
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2025-05-04T10:09:02.737Z",
        "orgId": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
        "shortName": "Linux"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b777b14c2a4a4e2322daf8e8ffd42d2b88831b17"
        },
        {
          "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2324fb4e92092837ee278fdd8d60c48ee1a619ce"
        },
        {
          "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/96ea081ed52bf077cad6d00153b6fba68e510767"
        }
      ],
      "title": "bpf: Reject struct_ops registration that uses module ptr and the module btf_id is missing",
      "x_generator": {
        "engine": "bippy-1.2.0"
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
    "assignerShortName": "Linux",
    "cveId": "CVE-2024-58060",
    "datePublished": "2025-03-06T15:54:03.253Z",
    "dateReserved": "2025-03-06T15:52:09.179Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2025-05-04T10:09:02.737Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.1",
  "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
    "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2024-58060\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67\",\"published\":\"2025-03-06T16:15:52.230\",\"lastModified\":\"2025-03-21T15:41:13.050\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Analyzed\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\\n\\nbpf: Reject struct_ops registration that uses module ptr and the module btf_id is missing\\n\\nThere is a UAF report in the bpf_struct_ops when CONFIG_MODULES=n.\\nIn particular, the report is on tcp_congestion_ops that has\\na \\\"struct module *owner\\\" member.\\n\\nFor struct_ops that has a \\\"struct module *owner\\\" member,\\nit can be extended either by the regular kernel module or\\nby the bpf_struct_ops. bpf_try_module_get() will be used\\nto do the refcounting and different refcount is done\\nbased on the owner pointer. When CONFIG_MODULES=n,\\nthe btf_id of the \\\"struct module\\\" is missing:\\n\\nWARN: resolve_btfids: unresolved symbol module\\n\\nThus, the bpf_try_module_get() cannot do the correct refcounting.\\n\\nNot all subsystem\u0027s struct_ops requires the \\\"struct module *owner\\\" member.\\ne.g. the recent sched_ext_ops.\\n\\nThis patch is to disable bpf_struct_ops registration if\\nthe struct_ops has the \\\"struct module *\\\" member and the\\n\\\"struct module\\\" btf_id is missing. The btf_type_is_fwd() helper\\nis moved to the btf.h header file for this test.\\n\\nThis has happened since the beginning of bpf_struct_ops which has gone\\nthrough many changes. The Fixes tag is set to a recent commit that this\\npatch can apply cleanly. Considering CONFIG_MODULES=n is not\\ncommon and the age of the issue, targeting for bpf-next also.\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"En el kernel de Linux, se ha resuelto la siguiente vulnerabilidad: bpf: Rechazar el registro de struct_ops que usa el m\u00f3dulo ptr y falta el m\u00f3dulo btf_id Hay un informe UAF en bpf_struct_ops cuando CONFIG_MODULES=n. En particular, el informe est\u00e1 en tcp_congestion_ops que tiene un miembro \\\"struct module *owner\\\". Para struct_ops que tiene un miembro \\\"struct module *owner\\\", puede extenderse mediante el m\u00f3dulo de kernel regular o mediante bpf_struct_ops. bpf_try_module_get() se usar\u00e1 para hacer el recuento de referencias y se realiza un recuento de referencias diferente seg\u00fan el puntero del propietario. Cuando CONFIG_MODULES=n, falta el btf_id del \\\"struct module\\\": WARN: resolve_btfids: m\u00f3dulo de s\u00edmbolo sin resolver Por lo tanto, bpf_try_module_get() no puede hacer el recuento de referencias correcto. No todos los struct_ops de los subsistemas requieren el miembro \\\"struct module *owner\\\", por ejemplo, el reciente sched_ext_ops. Este parche sirve para deshabilitar el registro de bpf_struct_ops si struct_ops tiene el miembro \\\"struct module *\\\" y falta el btf_id \\\"struct module\\\". El asistente btf_type_is_fwd() se ha movido al archivo de encabezado btf.h para esta prueba. Esto ha sucedido desde el comienzo de bpf_struct_ops, que ha sufrido muchos cambios. La etiqueta Fixes se establece en una confirmaci\u00f3n reciente que este parche puede aplicar sin problemas. Teniendo en cuenta que CONFIG_MODULES=n no es com\u00fan y la antig\u00fcedad del problema, tambi\u00e9n se apunta a bpf-next.\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV31\":[{\"source\":\"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H\",\"baseScore\":7.8,\"baseSeverity\":\"HIGH\",\"attackVector\":\"LOCAL\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"LOW\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"integrityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"HIGH\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":1.8,\"impactScore\":5.9}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-416\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"versionStartIncluding\":\"6.9\",\"versionEndExcluding\":\"6.12.13\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"AF4DF509-8040-448A-9D90-DDFA1A298CFE\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"versionStartIncluding\":\"6.13\",\"versionEndExcluding\":\"6.13.2\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"6D4116B1-1BFD-4F23-BA84-169CC05FC5A3\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2324fb4e92092837ee278fdd8d60c48ee1a619ce\",\"source\":\"416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67\",\"tags\":[\"Patch\"]},{\"url\":\"https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/96ea081ed52bf077cad6d00153b6fba68e510767\",\"source\":\"416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67\",\"tags\":[\"Patch\"]},{\"url\":\"https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b777b14c2a4a4e2322daf8e8ffd42d2b88831b17\",\"source\":\"416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67\",\"tags\":[\"Patch\"]}]}}",
    "vulnrichment": {
      "containers": "{\"adp\": [{\"title\": \"CISA ADP Vulnrichment\", \"metrics\": [{\"cvssV3_1\": {\"scope\": \"UNCHANGED\", \"version\": \"3.1\", \"baseScore\": 7.8, \"attackVector\": \"LOCAL\", \"baseSeverity\": \"HIGH\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H\", \"integrityImpact\": \"HIGH\", \"userInteraction\": \"NONE\", \"attackComplexity\": \"LOW\", \"availabilityImpact\": \"HIGH\", \"privilegesRequired\": \"LOW\", \"confidentialityImpact\": \"HIGH\"}}, {\"other\": {\"type\": \"ssvc\", \"content\": {\"id\": \"CVE-2024-58060\", \"role\": \"CISA Coordinator\", \"options\": [{\"Exploitation\": \"none\"}, {\"Automatable\": \"no\"}, {\"Technical Impact\": \"total\"}], \"version\": \"2.0.3\", \"timestamp\": \"2025-03-06T16:04:02.766596Z\"}}}], \"problemTypes\": [{\"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"CWE\", \"cweId\": \"CWE-416\", \"description\": \"CWE-416 Use After Free\"}]}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\", \"shortName\": \"CISA-ADP\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2025-03-06T16:04:04.391Z\"}}], \"cna\": {\"title\": \"bpf: Reject struct_ops registration that uses module ptr and the module btf_id is missing\", \"affected\": [{\"repo\": \"https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git\", \"vendor\": \"Linux\", \"product\": \"Linux\", \"versions\": [{\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"1611603537a4b88cec7993f32b70c03113801a46\", \"lessThan\": \"b777b14c2a4a4e2322daf8e8ffd42d2b88831b17\", \"versionType\": \"git\"}, {\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"1611603537a4b88cec7993f32b70c03113801a46\", \"lessThan\": \"2324fb4e92092837ee278fdd8d60c48ee1a619ce\", \"versionType\": \"git\"}, {\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"1611603537a4b88cec7993f32b70c03113801a46\", \"lessThan\": \"96ea081ed52bf077cad6d00153b6fba68e510767\", \"versionType\": \"git\"}], \"programFiles\": [\"include/linux/btf.h\", \"kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c\", \"kernel/bpf/btf.c\"], \"defaultStatus\": \"unaffected\"}, {\"repo\": \"https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git\", \"vendor\": \"Linux\", \"product\": \"Linux\", \"versions\": [{\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"6.9\"}, {\"status\": \"unaffected\", \"version\": \"0\", \"lessThan\": \"6.9\", \"versionType\": \"semver\"}, {\"status\": \"unaffected\", \"version\": \"6.12.13\", \"versionType\": \"semver\", \"lessThanOrEqual\": \"6.12.*\"}, {\"status\": \"unaffected\", \"version\": \"6.13.2\", \"versionType\": \"semver\", \"lessThanOrEqual\": \"6.13.*\"}, {\"status\": \"unaffected\", \"version\": \"6.14\", \"versionType\": \"original_commit_for_fix\", \"lessThanOrEqual\": \"*\"}], \"programFiles\": [\"include/linux/btf.h\", \"kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c\", \"kernel/bpf/btf.c\"], \"defaultStatus\": \"affected\"}], \"references\": [{\"url\": \"https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b777b14c2a4a4e2322daf8e8ffd42d2b88831b17\"}, {\"url\": \"https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2324fb4e92092837ee278fdd8d60c48ee1a619ce\"}, {\"url\": \"https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/96ea081ed52bf077cad6d00153b6fba68e510767\"}], \"x_generator\": {\"engine\": \"bippy-1.2.0\"}, \"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\\n\\nbpf: Reject struct_ops registration that uses module ptr and the module btf_id is missing\\n\\nThere is a UAF report in the bpf_struct_ops when CONFIG_MODULES=n.\\nIn particular, the report is on tcp_congestion_ops that has\\na \\\"struct module *owner\\\" member.\\n\\nFor struct_ops that has a \\\"struct module *owner\\\" member,\\nit can be extended either by the regular kernel module or\\nby the bpf_struct_ops. bpf_try_module_get() will be used\\nto do the refcounting and different refcount is done\\nbased on the owner pointer. When CONFIG_MODULES=n,\\nthe btf_id of the \\\"struct module\\\" is missing:\\n\\nWARN: resolve_btfids: unresolved symbol module\\n\\nThus, the bpf_try_module_get() cannot do the correct refcounting.\\n\\nNot all subsystem\u0027s struct_ops requires the \\\"struct module *owner\\\" member.\\ne.g. the recent sched_ext_ops.\\n\\nThis patch is to disable bpf_struct_ops registration if\\nthe struct_ops has the \\\"struct module *\\\" member and the\\n\\\"struct module\\\" btf_id is missing. The btf_type_is_fwd() helper\\nis moved to the btf.h header file for this test.\\n\\nThis has happened since the beginning of bpf_struct_ops which has gone\\nthrough many changes. The Fixes tag is set to a recent commit that this\\npatch can apply cleanly. Considering CONFIG_MODULES=n is not\\ncommon and the age of the issue, targeting for bpf-next also.\"}], \"cpeApplicability\": [{\"nodes\": [{\"negate\": false, \"cpeMatch\": [{\"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\", \"vulnerable\": true, \"versionEndExcluding\": \"6.12.13\", \"versionStartIncluding\": \"6.9\"}, {\"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\", \"vulnerable\": true, \"versionEndExcluding\": \"6.13.2\", \"versionStartIncluding\": \"6.9\"}, {\"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\", \"vulnerable\": true, \"versionEndExcluding\": \"6.14\", \"versionStartIncluding\": \"6.9\"}], \"operator\": \"OR\"}]}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67\", \"shortName\": \"Linux\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2025-05-04T10:09:02.737Z\"}}}",
      "cveMetadata": "{\"cveId\": \"CVE-2024-58060\", \"state\": \"PUBLISHED\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2025-05-04T10:09:02.737Z\", \"dateReserved\": \"2025-03-06T15:52:09.179Z\", \"assignerOrgId\": \"416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67\", \"datePublished\": \"2025-03-06T15:54:03.253Z\", \"assignerShortName\": \"Linux\"}",
      "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
      "dataVersion": "5.1"
    }
  }
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.