fkie_cve-2004-1808
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2004-12-31 05:00
Modified
2025-04-03 01:03
Severity ?
Summary
Extcompose in metamail does not verify the output file before writing to it, which allows local users to overwrite arbitrary files via a symlink attack.
References
cve@mitre.orghttp://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=107910934926062&w=2
cve@mitre.orghttp://www.securityfocus.com/bid/9850
cve@mitre.orghttps://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/15460
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=107910934926062&w=2
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/9850
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/15460
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
metamail_corporation metamail 2.7


To clipboard 

{
  "configurations": [
    {
      "nodes": [
        {
          "cpeMatch": [
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:metamail_corporation:metamail:2.7:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "9FB66F00-DC88-4FB0-83D9-B643EC09B37E",
              "vulnerable": true
            }
          ],
          "negate": false,
          "operator": "OR"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "Extcompose in metamail does not verify the output file before writing to it, which allows local users to overwrite arbitrary files via a symlink attack."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2004-1808",
  "lastModified": "2025-04-03T01:03:51.193",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV2": [
      {
        "acInsufInfo": false,
        "baseSeverity": "LOW",
        "cvssData": {
          "accessComplexity": "LOW",
          "accessVector": "LOCAL",
          "authentication": "NONE",
          "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
          "baseScore": 2.1,
          "confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
          "integrityImpact": "PARTIAL",
          "vectorString": "AV:L/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N",
          "version": "2.0"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 3.9,
        "impactScore": 2.9,
        "obtainAllPrivilege": false,
        "obtainOtherPrivilege": false,
        "obtainUserPrivilege": false,
        "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
        "type": "Primary",
        "userInteractionRequired": false
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2004-12-31T05:00:00.000",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "cve@mitre.org",
      "url": "http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq\u0026m=107910934926062\u0026w=2"
    },
    {
      "source": "cve@mitre.org",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/9850"
    },
    {
      "source": "cve@mitre.org",
      "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/15460"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "url": "http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq\u0026m=107910934926062\u0026w=2"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/9850"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/15460"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "cve@mitre.org",
  "vendorComments": [
    {
      "comment": "The Red Hat Security Response Team rated this issue as having low security impact. This issue affected Red Hat Enterprise Linux 2.1 but due to the low severity will not be fixed.  metamail was not shipped in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3, 4, or 5.",
      "lastModified": "2009-06-01T00:00:00",
      "organization": "Red Hat"
    }
  ],
  "vulnStatus": "Deferred",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "NVD-CWE-Other"
        }
      ],
      "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
      "type": "Primary"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.