fkie_cve-2007-1692
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2007-03-26 23:19
Modified
2025-04-09 00:30
Severity ?
Summary
The default configuration of Microsoft Windows uses the Web Proxy Autodiscovery Protocol (WPAD) without static WPAD entries, which might allow remote attackers to intercept web traffic by registering a proxy server using WINS or DNS, then responding to WPAD requests, as demonstrated using Internet Explorer. NOTE: it could be argued that if an attacker already has control over WINS/DNS, then web traffic could already be intercepted by modifying WINS or DNS records, so this would not cross privilege boundaries and would not be a vulnerability. It has also been reported that DHCP is an alternate attack vector.
Impacted products



{
  "configurations": [
    {
      "nodes": [
        {
          "cpeMatch": [
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:microsoft:windows_2000:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "4E545C63-FE9C-4CA1-AF0F-D999D84D2AFD",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:microsoft:windows_2003_server:2000:*:small_business_server:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "1DF610DF-6AE4-4CF3-A9AB-823228BEF157",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:microsoft:windows_2003_server:r2:*:datacenter_64-bit:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "34ACB544-87DD-4D9A-99F0-A10F48C1EE05",
              "vulnerable": true
            }
          ],
          "negate": false,
          "operator": "OR"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "The default configuration of Microsoft Windows uses the Web Proxy Autodiscovery Protocol (WPAD) without static WPAD entries, which might allow remote attackers to intercept web traffic by registering a proxy server using WINS or DNS, then responding to WPAD requests, as demonstrated using Internet Explorer.  NOTE: it could be argued that if an attacker already has control over WINS/DNS, then web traffic could already be intercepted by modifying WINS or DNS records, so this would not cross privilege boundaries and would not be a vulnerability.  It has also been reported that DHCP is an alternate attack vector."
    },
    {
      "lang": "es",
      "value": "La configuraci\u00f3n predeterminada de Microsoft Windows usa el Web Proxy Autodiscovery Protocol (WPAD) sin entradas WPAD est\u00e1ticas, lo que podr\u00eda permitir a atacantes remotos interceptar el tr\u00e1fico web mediante el registro de un servidor proxy usando WINS o DNS y, a continuaci\u00f3n, responder a peticiones WPAD, como es demostrado por Internet Explorer. NOTA: se podr\u00eda argumentar que si un atacante ya tiene control sobre WINS/DNS, entonces el tr\u00e1fico web ya podr\u00eda ser interceptado mediante la modificaci\u00f3n de registros WINS o DNS, por lo que esto no cruzar\u00eda los l\u00edmites de privilegios y no ser\u00eda una vulnerabilidad. Tambi\u00e9n se ha reportado que DHCP es un vector de ataque alternativo."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2007-1692",
  "lastModified": "2025-04-09T00:30:58.490",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV2": [
      {
        "acInsufInfo": false,
        "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
        "cvssData": {
          "accessComplexity": "LOW",
          "accessVector": "NETWORK",
          "authentication": "NONE",
          "availabilityImpact": "PARTIAL",
          "baseScore": 7.5,
          "confidentialityImpact": "PARTIAL",
          "integrityImpact": "PARTIAL",
          "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P",
          "version": "2.0"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 10.0,
        "impactScore": 6.4,
        "obtainAllPrivilege": false,
        "obtainOtherPrivilege": false,
        "obtainUserPrivilege": false,
        "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
        "type": "Primary",
        "userInteractionRequired": false
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2007-03-26T23:19:00.000",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "cve@mitre.org",
      "url": "http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/isn/2007-q1/0418.html"
    },
    {
      "source": "cve@mitre.org",
      "url": "http://isc.sans.org/diary.html?storyid=2517"
    },
    {
      "source": "cve@mitre.org",
      "url": "http://news.com.com/Windows+weakness+can+lead+to+network+traffic+hijacks/2100-1002_3-6170229.html"
    },
    {
      "source": "cve@mitre.org",
      "url": "http://support.microsoft.com/kb/934864"
    },
    {
      "source": "cve@mitre.org",
      "tags": [
        "Vendor Advisory"
      ],
      "url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2007/1115"
    },
    {
      "source": "cve@mitre.org",
      "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/33244"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "url": "http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/isn/2007-q1/0418.html"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "url": "http://isc.sans.org/diary.html?storyid=2517"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "url": "http://news.com.com/Windows+weakness+can+lead+to+network+traffic+hijacks/2100-1002_3-6170229.html"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "url": "http://support.microsoft.com/kb/934864"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "tags": [
        "Vendor Advisory"
      ],
      "url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2007/1115"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/33244"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "cve@mitre.org",
  "vulnStatus": "Deferred",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-16"
        }
      ],
      "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
      "type": "Primary"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.


Loading…

Loading…