fkie_cve-2008-2956
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2008-07-01 22:41
Modified
2025-04-09 00:30
Severity ?
Summary
Memory leak in Pidgin 2.0.0, and possibly other versions, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) via malformed XML documents. NOTE: this issue has been disputed by the upstream vendor, who states: "I was never able to identify a scenario under which a problem occurred and the original reporter wasn't able to supply any sort of reproduction details."
References
{ "configurations": [ { "nodes": [ { "cpeMatch": [ { "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:pidgin:pidgin:2.0.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "matchCriteriaId": "DBC2EBF3-73A7-4542-8E9C-47A4241A224C", "vulnerable": true } ], "negate": false, "operator": "OR" } ] } ], "cveTags": [ { "sourceIdentifier": "secalert@redhat.com", "tags": [ "disputed" ] } ], "descriptions": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "Memory leak in Pidgin 2.0.0, and possibly other versions, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) via malformed XML documents. NOTE: this issue has been disputed by the upstream vendor, who states: \"I was never able to identify a scenario under which a problem occurred and the original reporter wasn\u0027t able to supply any sort of reproduction details.\"" }, { "lang": "es", "value": "** DISPUTED ** Fuga de memoria en Pidgin 2.0.0 y posiblemente otras versiones, permite a atacantes remotos causar una denegaci\u00f3n de servicio (consumo de memoria) a trav\u00e9s documentos XML malformados. NOTA: este problema ha sido disputado por el proveedor original, que dice: \u0027Nunca he podido identificar un escenario en que problema ocurri\u00f3 y el investigador original no pudo suministrar cualquier tipo de detalles de la reproducci\u00f3n.\u0027" } ], "id": "CVE-2008-2956", "lastModified": "2025-04-09T00:30:58.490", "metrics": { "cvssMetricV2": [ { "acInsufInfo": false, "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM", "cvssData": { "accessComplexity": "LOW", "accessVector": "NETWORK", "authentication": "NONE", "availabilityImpact": "PARTIAL", "baseScore": 5.0, "confidentialityImpact": "NONE", "integrityImpact": "NONE", "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P", "version": "2.0" }, "exploitabilityScore": 10.0, "impactScore": 2.9, "obtainAllPrivilege": false, "obtainOtherPrivilege": false, "obtainUserPrivilege": false, "source": "nvd@nist.gov", "type": "Primary", "userInteractionRequired": false } ] }, "published": "2008-07-01T22:41:00.000", "references": [ { "source": "secalert@redhat.com", "url": "http://crisp.cs.du.edu/?q=ca2007-1" }, { "source": "secalert@redhat.com", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/31387" }, { "source": "secalert@redhat.com", "url": "http://wiki.rpath.com/wiki/Advisories:rPSA-2008-0246" }, { "source": "secalert@redhat.com", "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2008/06/27/3" }, { "source": "secalert@redhat.com", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/495165/100/0/threaded" }, { "source": "secalert@redhat.com", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/29985" }, { "source": "secalert@redhat.com", "url": "https://issues.rpath.com/browse/RPL-2647" }, { "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", "url": "http://crisp.cs.du.edu/?q=ca2007-1" }, { "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/31387" }, { "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", "url": "http://wiki.rpath.com/wiki/Advisories:rPSA-2008-0246" }, { "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2008/06/27/3" }, { "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/495165/100/0/threaded" }, { "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/29985" }, { "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", "url": "https://issues.rpath.com/browse/RPL-2647" } ], "sourceIdentifier": "secalert@redhat.com", "vulnStatus": "Deferred", "weaknesses": [ { "description": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "CWE-399" } ], "source": "nvd@nist.gov", "type": "Primary" } ] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…