fkie_cve-2008-7257
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2010-06-29 18:30
Modified
2025-04-11 00:51
Severity ?
Summary
CRLF injection vulnerability in +webvpn+/index.html in WebVPN on Cisco Adaptive Security Appliances (ASA) 5580 series devices with software before 8.1(2) allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary HTTP headers as demonstrated by a redirect attack involving a %0d%0aLocation%3a sequence in a URI, or conduct HTTP response splitting attacks via unspecified vectors, aka Bug ID CSCsr09163.
References
{ "configurations": [ { "nodes": [ { "cpeMatch": [ { "criteria": "cpe:2.3:h:cisco:asa_5580:8.1\\(1\\):*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "matchCriteriaId": "D314EDEE-4A4F-477D-94CF-C2A747755813", "vulnerable": true } ], "negate": false, "operator": "OR" } ] } ], "cveTags": [], "descriptions": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "CRLF injection vulnerability in +webvpn+/index.html in WebVPN on Cisco Adaptive Security Appliances (ASA) 5580 series devices with software before 8.1(2) allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary HTTP headers as demonstrated by a redirect attack involving a %0d%0aLocation%3a sequence in a URI, or conduct HTTP response splitting attacks via unspecified vectors, aka Bug ID CSCsr09163." }, { "lang": "es", "value": "Vulnerabilidad de inyecci\u00f3n CRLF (se refiere a CR (retorno de carro) y LF (salto de l\u00ednea)) en +webvpn+/index.html del portal WebVPN de dispositivos Cisco Adaptive Security Appliances (ASA) de la serie 5580 con versi\u00f3n anterior a v8.1(2) permite a atacantes remotos inyectar cabeceras HTTP de su elecci\u00f3n como se demostr\u00f3 con un ataque por redirecci\u00f3n con la secuencia 0d%0aLocation%3a en una URI,o llevar a cabo ataques de divisi\u00f3n de respuesta HTTP a trav\u00e9s de vectores sin especificar, tambi\u00e9n conocido como Bug ID CSCsr09163." } ], "id": "CVE-2008-7257", "lastModified": "2025-04-11T00:51:21.963", "metrics": { "cvssMetricV2": [ { "acInsufInfo": false, "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM", "cvssData": { "accessComplexity": "MEDIUM", "accessVector": "NETWORK", "authentication": "NONE", "availabilityImpact": "NONE", "baseScore": 4.3, "confidentialityImpact": "NONE", "integrityImpact": "PARTIAL", "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N", "version": "2.0" }, "exploitabilityScore": 8.6, "impactScore": 2.9, "obtainAllPrivilege": false, "obtainOtherPrivilege": false, "obtainUserPrivilege": false, "source": "nvd@nist.gov", "type": "Primary", "userInteractionRequired": true } ] }, "published": "2010-06-29T18:30:01.410", "references": [ { "source": "cve@mitre.org", "url": "http://securitytracker.com/id?1024155" }, { "source": "cve@mitre.org", "url": "http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/asa/asa81/release/notes/asarn812.html" }, { "source": "cve@mitre.org", "url": "http://www.secureworks.com/ctu/advisories/SWRX-2010-001" }, { "source": "cve@mitre.org", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/512023/100/0/threaded" }, { "source": "cve@mitre.org", "tags": [ "Exploit" ], "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/41159" }, { "source": "cve@mitre.org", "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/59850" }, { "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", "url": "http://securitytracker.com/id?1024155" }, { "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", "url": "http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/asa/asa81/release/notes/asarn812.html" }, { "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", "url": "http://www.secureworks.com/ctu/advisories/SWRX-2010-001" }, { "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/512023/100/0/threaded" }, { "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", "tags": [ "Exploit" ], "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/41159" }, { "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/59850" } ], "sourceIdentifier": "cve@mitre.org", "vulnStatus": "Deferred", "weaknesses": [ { "description": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "CWE-20" } ], "source": "nvd@nist.gov", "type": "Primary" } ] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…