fkie_cve-2013-3271
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2013-08-28 13:13
Modified
2025-04-11 00:51
Severity ?
Summary
EMC RSA Authentication Agent for PAM 7.0 before 7.0.2.1 enforces the maximum number of login attempts within the PAM-enabled application codebase, instead of within the Agent codebase, which makes it easier for remote attackers to discover correct login credentials via a brute-force attack.
Impacted products



{
  "configurations": [
    {
      "nodes": [
        {
          "cpeMatch": [
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:emc:rsa_authentication_agent:7.0.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "894453F7-9D59-498F-89A4-60EA9EBEC0A0",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:emc:rsa_authentication_agent:7.0.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "28B25179-F782-4E6A-BF34-6FAD84B68BA1",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:emc:rsa_authentication_agent:7.0.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "2798B404-E71D-4943-B37B-2A2207CDAE87",
              "vulnerable": true
            }
          ],
          "negate": false,
          "operator": "OR"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "EMC RSA Authentication Agent for PAM 7.0 before 7.0.2.1 enforces the maximum number of login attempts within the PAM-enabled application codebase, instead of within the Agent codebase, which makes it easier for remote attackers to discover correct login credentials via a brute-force attack."
    },
    {
      "lang": "es",
      "value": "EMC RSA Authentication Agent para PAM v7.0 anterior a v7.0.2.1 hace cumplir el n\u00famero m\u00e1ximo de intentos de conexi\u00f3n del c\u00f3digo base cuando PAM est\u00e1 habilitado, en lugar de en el c\u00f3digo base del Agente, lo que hace que sea m\u00e1s f\u00e1cil para los atacantes remotos descubrir credenciales correctas a trav\u00e9s de un ataque de fuerza bruta."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2013-3271",
  "lastModified": "2025-04-11T00:51:21.963",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV2": [
      {
        "acInsufInfo": false,
        "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
        "cvssData": {
          "accessComplexity": "LOW",
          "accessVector": "NETWORK",
          "authentication": "NONE",
          "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
          "baseScore": 5.0,
          "confidentialityImpact": "PARTIAL",
          "integrityImpact": "NONE",
          "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N",
          "version": "2.0"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 10.0,
        "impactScore": 2.9,
        "obtainAllPrivilege": false,
        "obtainOtherPrivilege": false,
        "obtainUserPrivilege": false,
        "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
        "type": "Primary",
        "userInteractionRequired": false
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2013-08-28T13:13:58.180",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "security_alert@emc.com",
      "url": "http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2013-08/0123.html"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "url": "http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2013-08/0123.html"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "security_alert@emc.com",
  "vulnStatus": "Deferred",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-255"
        }
      ],
      "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
      "type": "Primary"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.


Loading…

Loading…