fkie_cve-2015-0881
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2015-02-20 11:59
Modified
2025-04-12 10:46
Severity ?
Summary
CRLF injection vulnerability in Squid before 3.1.1 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary HTTP headers and conduct HTTP response splitting attacks via a crafted header in a response.
References
vultures@jpcert.or.jphttp://jvn.jp/en/jp/JVN64455813/index.htmlVendor Advisory
vultures@jpcert.or.jphttp://jvndb.jvn.jp/jvndb/JVNDB-2015-000019Vendor Advisory
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108http://jvn.jp/en/jp/JVN64455813/index.htmlVendor Advisory
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108http://jvndb.jvn.jp/jvndb/JVNDB-2015-000019Vendor Advisory
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
squid-cache squid *


To clipboard 

{
  "configurations": [
    {
      "nodes": [
        {
          "cpeMatch": [
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:squid-cache:squid:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "29017047-581E-4A88-8160-A2A97E9E7F89",
              "versionEndIncluding": "3.1.0.18",
              "vulnerable": true
            }
          ],
          "negate": false,
          "operator": "OR"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "CRLF injection vulnerability in Squid before 3.1.1 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary HTTP headers and conduct HTTP response splitting attacks via a crafted header in a response."
    },
    {
      "lang": "es",
      "value": "Una vulnerabilidad de inyecci\u00f3n CRLF en Squid anterior a versi\u00f3n 3.1.1, permite a los atacantes remotos inyectar encabezados HTTP arbitrarios y conducir ataques de divisi\u00f3n de respuesta HTTP por medio de un encabezado dise\u00f1ado en una respuesta."
    }
  ],
  "evaluatorComment": "\u003ca href=\"http://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/93.html\" target=\"_blank\"\u003eCWE-93: CWE-93: Improper Neutralization of CRLF Sequences (\u0027CRLF Injection\u0027)\u003c/a\u003e",
  "id": "CVE-2015-0881",
  "lastModified": "2025-04-12T10:46:40.837",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV2": [
      {
        "acInsufInfo": false,
        "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
        "cvssData": {
          "accessComplexity": "MEDIUM",
          "accessVector": "NETWORK",
          "authentication": "NONE",
          "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
          "baseScore": 4.3,
          "confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
          "integrityImpact": "PARTIAL",
          "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N",
          "version": "2.0"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 8.6,
        "impactScore": 2.9,
        "obtainAllPrivilege": false,
        "obtainOtherPrivilege": false,
        "obtainUserPrivilege": false,
        "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
        "type": "Primary",
        "userInteractionRequired": true
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2015-02-20T11:59:04.840",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "vultures@jpcert.or.jp",
      "tags": [
        "Vendor Advisory"
      ],
      "url": "http://jvn.jp/en/jp/JVN64455813/index.html"
    },
    {
      "source": "vultures@jpcert.or.jp",
      "tags": [
        "Vendor Advisory"
      ],
      "url": "http://jvndb.jvn.jp/jvndb/JVNDB-2015-000019"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "tags": [
        "Vendor Advisory"
      ],
      "url": "http://jvn.jp/en/jp/JVN64455813/index.html"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "tags": [
        "Vendor Advisory"
      ],
      "url": "http://jvndb.jvn.jp/jvndb/JVNDB-2015-000019"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "vultures@jpcert.or.jp",
  "vulnStatus": "Deferred",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "NVD-CWE-Other"
        }
      ],
      "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
      "type": "Primary"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.