fkie_cve-2015-2963
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2015-07-10 17:59
Modified
2025-04-12 10:46
Severity ?
Summary
The thoughtbot paperclip gem before 4.2.2 for Ruby does not consider the content-type value during media-type validation, which allows remote attackers to upload HTML documents and conduct cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks via a spoofed value, as demonstrated by image/jpeg.
References
Impacted products
Vendor | Product | Version | |
---|---|---|---|
thoughtbot | paperclip | * |
{ "configurations": [ { "nodes": [ { "cpeMatch": [ { "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:thoughtbot:paperclip:*:*:*:*:*:ruby:*:*", "matchCriteriaId": "DE525443-1C61-4909-A20A-38209B765FBE", "versionEndIncluding": "4.2.1", "vulnerable": true } ], "negate": false, "operator": "OR" } ] } ], "cveTags": [], "descriptions": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "The thoughtbot paperclip gem before 4.2.2 for Ruby does not consider the content-type value during media-type validation, which allows remote attackers to upload HTML documents and conduct cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks via a spoofed value, as demonstrated by image/jpeg." }, { "lang": "es", "value": "Thoughtbot paperclip gem en versiones anteriores a la 4.2.2 para Ruby no tiene en cuenta el valor de tipo de contenido durante la validaci\u00f3n de tipo de medios, lo que permite a atacantes remotos subir documentos HTML y realizar cross-site scripting (XSS) a trav\u00e9s de un valor suplantado, como se demuestra por la imagen / jpeg." } ], "id": "CVE-2015-2963", "lastModified": "2025-04-12T10:46:40.837", "metrics": { "cvssMetricV2": [ { "acInsufInfo": false, "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM", "cvssData": { "accessComplexity": "MEDIUM", "accessVector": "NETWORK", "authentication": "NONE", "availabilityImpact": "NONE", "baseScore": 4.3, "confidentialityImpact": "NONE", "integrityImpact": "PARTIAL", "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N", "version": "2.0" }, "exploitabilityScore": 8.6, "impactScore": 2.9, "obtainAllPrivilege": false, "obtainOtherPrivilege": false, "obtainUserPrivilege": false, "source": "nvd@nist.gov", "type": "Primary", "userInteractionRequired": true } ] }, "published": "2015-07-10T17:59:00.093", "references": [ { "source": "vultures@jpcert.or.jp", "tags": [ "Vendor Advisory" ], "url": "http://jvn.jp/en/jp/JVN83881261/index.html" }, { "source": "vultures@jpcert.or.jp", "tags": [ "Vendor Advisory" ], "url": "http://jvndb.jvn.jp/jvndb/JVNDB-2015-000088" }, { "source": "vultures@jpcert.or.jp", "tags": [ "Vendor Advisory" ], "url": "http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2015/06/19/3" }, { "source": "vultures@jpcert.or.jp", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/75304" }, { "source": "vultures@jpcert.or.jp", "tags": [ "Exploit", "Vendor Advisory" ], "url": "https://github.com/thoughtbot/paperclip/commit/9aee4112f36058cd28d5fe4a006d6981bd1eda57" }, { "source": "vultures@jpcert.or.jp", "tags": [ "Vendor Advisory" ], "url": "https://robots.thoughtbot.com/paperclip-security-release" }, { "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", "tags": [ "Vendor Advisory" ], "url": "http://jvn.jp/en/jp/JVN83881261/index.html" }, { "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", "tags": [ "Vendor Advisory" ], "url": "http://jvndb.jvn.jp/jvndb/JVNDB-2015-000088" }, { "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", "tags": [ "Vendor Advisory" ], "url": "http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2015/06/19/3" }, { "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/75304" }, { "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", "tags": [ "Exploit", "Vendor Advisory" ], "url": "https://github.com/thoughtbot/paperclip/commit/9aee4112f36058cd28d5fe4a006d6981bd1eda57" }, { "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", "tags": [ "Vendor Advisory" ], "url": "https://robots.thoughtbot.com/paperclip-security-release" } ], "sourceIdentifier": "vultures@jpcert.or.jp", "vulnStatus": "Deferred", "weaknesses": [ { "description": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "CWE-79" } ], "source": "nvd@nist.gov", "type": "Primary" } ] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…