fkie_cve-2015-4458
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2015-07-18 10:59
Modified
2025-04-12 10:46
Severity ?
Summary
The TLS implementation in the Cavium cryptographic-module firmware, as distributed with Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software 9.1(5.21) and other products, does not verify the MAC field, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof TLS content by modifying packets, aka Bug ID CSCuu52976.
References
cve@mitre.orghttp://tools.cisco.com/security/center/viewAlert.x?alertId=39919Vendor Advisory
cve@mitre.orghttp://www.securitytracker.com/id/1032927
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108http://tools.cisco.com/security/center/viewAlert.x?alertId=39919Vendor Advisory
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1032927
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
cisco adaptive_security_appliance_software 9.1.5.21


To clipboard 

{
  "configurations": [
    {
      "nodes": [
        {
          "cpeMatch": [
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:cisco:adaptive_security_appliance_software:9.1.5.21:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "A05B2DFD-A0EF-42BE-B00B-334E78CA8C10",
              "vulnerable": true
            }
          ],
          "negate": false,
          "operator": "OR"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "The TLS implementation in the Cavium cryptographic-module firmware, as distributed with Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software 9.1(5.21) and other products, does not verify the MAC field, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof TLS content by modifying packets, aka Bug ID CSCuu52976."
    },
    {
      "lang": "es",
      "value": "Vulnerabilidad en la implementaci\u00f3n TLS en el firmware del m\u00f3dulo criptogr\u00e1fico de Cavium, asi como el distribuido con el Software Cisco Adaptive Security Apliance (ASA) 9.1 (5.21) y otros productos, no verifica el campo MAC, permite a atacantes man-in-the-middle falsificar el contenido TLS modificando los paquetes, tambi\u00e9n conocido como Bug ID CSCCuu52976."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2015-4458",
  "lastModified": "2025-04-12T10:46:40.837",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV2": [
      {
        "acInsufInfo": false,
        "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
        "cvssData": {
          "accessComplexity": "MEDIUM",
          "accessVector": "NETWORK",
          "authentication": "NONE",
          "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
          "baseScore": 4.3,
          "confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
          "integrityImpact": "PARTIAL",
          "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N",
          "version": "2.0"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 8.6,
        "impactScore": 2.9,
        "obtainAllPrivilege": false,
        "obtainOtherPrivilege": false,
        "obtainUserPrivilege": false,
        "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
        "type": "Primary",
        "userInteractionRequired": false
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2015-07-18T10:59:02.713",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "cve@mitre.org",
      "tags": [
        "Vendor Advisory"
      ],
      "url": "http://tools.cisco.com/security/center/viewAlert.x?alertId=39919"
    },
    {
      "source": "cve@mitre.org",
      "url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1032927"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "tags": [
        "Vendor Advisory"
      ],
      "url": "http://tools.cisco.com/security/center/viewAlert.x?alertId=39919"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1032927"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "cve@mitre.org",
  "vulnStatus": "Deferred",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-310"
        }
      ],
      "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
      "type": "Primary"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.