fkie_cve-2015-5259
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2016-01-08 19:59
Modified
2025-04-12 10:46
Severity ?
Summary
Integer overflow in the read_string function in libsvn_ra_svn/marshal.c in Apache Subversion 1.9.x before 1.9.3 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via an svn:// protocol string, which triggers a heap-based buffer overflow and an out-of-bounds read.
References
Impacted products
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| apache | subversion | 1.9.0 | |
| apache | subversion | 1.9.1 | |
| apache | subversion | 1.9.2 |
{
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:apache:subversion:1.9.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "892FF423-1848-4E69-8C4C-E1972B656196",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:apache:subversion:1.9.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "9ACF37C7-8752-4A8F-B7E3-2E813C4A0DF0",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:apache:subversion:1.9.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "74200C33-9505-48EB-964D-6CA28C7F6DB8",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Integer overflow in the read_string function in libsvn_ra_svn/marshal.c in Apache Subversion 1.9.x before 1.9.3 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via an svn:// protocol string, which triggers a heap-based buffer overflow and an out-of-bounds read."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "Desbordamiento de entero en la funci\u00f3n read_string en libsvn_ra_svn/marshal.c en Apache Subversion 1.9.x en versiones anteriores a 1.9.3 permite a atacantes remotos ejecutar c\u00f3digo arbitrario a trav\u00e9s de una cadena del protocolo svn://, lo que desencadena un desbordamiento de buffer basado en memoria din\u00e1mica y una lectura fuera de rango."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2015-5259",
"lastModified": "2025-04-12T10:46:40.837",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV2": [
{
"acInsufInfo": false,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"cvssData": {
"accessComplexity": "LOW",
"accessVector": "NETWORK",
"authentication": "NONE",
"availabilityImpact": "COMPLETE",
"baseScore": 9.0,
"confidentialityImpact": "PARTIAL",
"integrityImpact": "PARTIAL",
"vectorString": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:C",
"version": "2.0"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 10.0,
"impactScore": 8.5,
"obtainAllPrivilege": false,
"obtainOtherPrivilege": false,
"obtainUserPrivilege": false,
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
],
"cvssMetricV30": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 8.6,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"integrityImpact": "LOW",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:H",
"version": "3.0"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 3.9,
"impactScore": 4.7,
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
},
"published": "2016-01-08T19:59:01.410",
"references": [
{
"source": "secalert@redhat.com",
"tags": [
"Vendor Advisory"
],
"url": "http://subversion.apache.org/security/CVE-2015-5259-advisory.txt"
},
{
"source": "secalert@redhat.com",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/82300"
},
{
"source": "secalert@redhat.com",
"url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1034469"
},
{
"source": "secalert@redhat.com",
"url": "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201610-05"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Vendor Advisory"
],
"url": "http://subversion.apache.org/security/CVE-2015-5259-advisory.txt"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/82300"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1034469"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"url": "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201610-05"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "secalert@redhat.com",
"vulnStatus": "Deferred",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-119"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-189"
}
],
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…