fkie_cve-2016-2193
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2016-04-11 15:59
Modified
2025-04-12 10:46
Severity ?
Summary
PostgreSQL before 9.5.x before 9.5.2 does not properly maintain row-security status in cached plans, which might allow attackers to bypass intended access restrictions by leveraging a session that performs queries as more than one role.
References
Impacted products
Vendor | Product | Version | |
---|---|---|---|
postgresql | postgresql | 9.5 | |
postgresql | postgresql | 9.5.1 |
{ "configurations": [ { "nodes": [ { "cpeMatch": [ { "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:postgresql:postgresql:9.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "matchCriteriaId": "9FF7FC5B-C9E3-4109-B3D6-9AC06F75DCB3", "vulnerable": true }, { "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:postgresql:postgresql:9.5.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "matchCriteriaId": "D2C15A86-9ED9-492E-877B-86963DAA761A", "vulnerable": true } ], "negate": false, "operator": "OR" } ] } ], "cveTags": [], "descriptions": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "PostgreSQL before 9.5.x before 9.5.2 does not properly maintain row-security status in cached plans, which might allow attackers to bypass intended access restrictions by leveraging a session that performs queries as more than one role." }, { "lang": "es", "value": "PostgreSQL en versiones anteriores a 9.5.x en versiones anteriores a 9.5.2 no mantiene correctamente el estado de seguridad en fila en planos cacheados, lo que podr\u00eda permitir a atacantes eludir las restricciones destinadas al acceso aprovechando una sesi\u00f3n que realiza consultas como m\u00e1s de un rol." } ], "id": "CVE-2016-2193", "lastModified": "2025-04-12T10:46:40.837", "metrics": { "cvssMetricV2": [ { "acInsufInfo": false, "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM", "cvssData": { "accessComplexity": "LOW", "accessVector": "NETWORK", "authentication": "NONE", "availabilityImpact": "NONE", "baseScore": 5.0, "confidentialityImpact": "NONE", "integrityImpact": "PARTIAL", "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N", "version": "2.0" }, "exploitabilityScore": 10.0, "impactScore": 2.9, "obtainAllPrivilege": false, "obtainOtherPrivilege": false, "obtainUserPrivilege": false, "source": "nvd@nist.gov", "type": "Primary" } ], "cvssMetricV30": [ { "cvssData": { "attackComplexity": "LOW", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "availabilityImpact": "NONE", "baseScore": 7.5, "baseSeverity": "HIGH", "confidentialityImpact": "NONE", "integrityImpact": "HIGH", "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "userInteraction": "NONE", "vectorString": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N", "version": "3.0" }, "exploitabilityScore": 3.9, "impactScore": 3.6, "source": "nvd@nist.gov", "type": "Primary" } ] }, "published": "2016-04-11T15:59:04.500", "references": [ { "source": "secalert@redhat.com", "url": "http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=db69e58a0642ef7fa46d62f6c4cf2460c3a1b41b" }, { "source": "secalert@redhat.com", "tags": [ "Patch", "Vendor Advisory" ], "url": "http://www.postgresql.org/about/news/1656/" }, { "source": "secalert@redhat.com", "tags": [ "Vendor Advisory" ], "url": "http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/release-9-5-2.html" }, { "source": "secalert@redhat.com", "url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1035468" }, { "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", "url": "http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=db69e58a0642ef7fa46d62f6c4cf2460c3a1b41b" }, { "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", "tags": [ "Patch", "Vendor Advisory" ], "url": "http://www.postgresql.org/about/news/1656/" }, { "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", "tags": [ "Vendor Advisory" ], "url": "http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/release-9-5-2.html" }, { "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", "url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1035468" } ], "sourceIdentifier": "secalert@redhat.com", "vulnStatus": "Deferred", "weaknesses": [ { "description": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "CWE-254" } ], "source": "nvd@nist.gov", "type": "Primary" } ] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…