fkie_cve-2018-16710
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2018-09-07 19:29
Modified
2024-11-21 03:53
Severity ?
Summary
OctoPrint through 1.3.9 allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information or cause a denial of service via HTTP requests on port 8081. NOTE: the vendor disputes the significance of this report because their documentation states that with "blind port forwarding ... Putting OctoPrint onto the public internet is a terrible idea, and I really can't emphasize that enough.
References
| ▶ | URL | Tags | |
|---|---|---|---|
| cve@mitre.org | https://github.com/foosel/OctoPrint/issues/2814 | Exploit, Issue Tracking, Third Party Advisory | |
| af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108 | https://github.com/foosel/OctoPrint/issues/2814 | Exploit, Issue Tracking, Third Party Advisory |
{
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:octoprint:octoprint:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "9ED02529-8762-4501-B994-E4BF6DE0A288",
"versionEndIncluding": "1.3.9",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"cveTags": [
{
"sourceIdentifier": "cve@mitre.org",
"tags": [
"disputed"
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "OctoPrint through 1.3.9 allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information or cause a denial of service via HTTP requests on port 8081. NOTE: the vendor disputes the significance of this report because their documentation states that with \"blind port forwarding ... Putting OctoPrint onto the public internet is a terrible idea, and I really can\u0027t emphasize that enough."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "** EN DISPUTA ** OctoPrint hasta la versi\u00f3n 1.3.9 permite que atacantes remotos obtengan informaci\u00f3n sensible o provoquen una denegaci\u00f3n de servicio (DoS) mediante peticiones HTTP en el puerto 8081. NOTA: el fabricante discute la relevancia de este informe debido a que su documentaci\u00f3n indica que con \"reenv\u00edo ciego de puertos... poner OctoPrint en el Internet p\u00fablico es una idea terrible, y no podemos remarcarlo lo suficiente\"."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2018-16710",
"lastModified": "2024-11-21T03:53:12.197",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV2": [
{
"acInsufInfo": false,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"cvssData": {
"accessComplexity": "LOW",
"accessVector": "NETWORK",
"authentication": "NONE",
"availabilityImpact": "PARTIAL",
"baseScore": 6.4,
"confidentialityImpact": "PARTIAL",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"vectorString": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:P",
"version": "2.0"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 10.0,
"impactScore": 4.9,
"obtainAllPrivilege": false,
"obtainOtherPrivilege": false,
"obtainUserPrivilege": false,
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary",
"userInteractionRequired": false
}
],
"cvssMetricV30": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 9.1,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H",
"version": "3.0"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 3.9,
"impactScore": 5.2,
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
},
"published": "2018-09-07T19:29:00.537",
"references": [
{
"source": "cve@mitre.org",
"tags": [
"Exploit",
"Issue Tracking",
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "https://github.com/foosel/OctoPrint/issues/2814"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Exploit",
"Issue Tracking",
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "https://github.com/foosel/OctoPrint/issues/2814"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "cve@mitre.org",
"vulnStatus": "Modified",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-200"
}
],
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…