fkie_cve-2019-16152
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2020-02-06 16:15
Modified
2024-11-21 04:30
Severity ?
Summary
A Denial of service (DoS) vulnerability in FortiClient for Linux 6.2.1 and below may allow an user with low privilege to cause FortiClient processes running under root privilege crashes via sending specially crafted IPC client requests to the fctsched process due the nanomsg not been correctly validated.
References
▶ | URL | Tags | |
---|---|---|---|
psirt@fortinet.com | https://danishcyberdefence.dk/blog/forticlient_linux | Exploit, Third Party Advisory | |
psirt@fortinet.com | https://fortiguard.com/psirt/FG-IR-19-238 | Vendor Advisory | |
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108 | https://danishcyberdefence.dk/blog/forticlient_linux | Exploit, Third Party Advisory | |
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108 | https://fortiguard.com/psirt/FG-IR-19-238 | Vendor Advisory |
Impacted products
Vendor | Product | Version | |
---|---|---|---|
fortinet | forticlient | * |
{ "configurations": [ { "nodes": [ { "cpeMatch": [ { "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:forticlient:*:*:*:*:*:linux:*:*", "matchCriteriaId": "E48E9C78-9690-4FC2-86A8-290DF7321A57", "versionEndIncluding": "6.2.1", "vulnerable": true } ], "negate": false, "operator": "OR" } ] } ], "cveTags": [], "descriptions": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "A Denial of service (DoS) vulnerability in FortiClient for Linux 6.2.1 and below may allow an user with low privilege to cause FortiClient processes running under root privilege crashes via sending specially crafted IPC client requests to the fctsched process due the nanomsg not been correctly validated." }, { "lang": "es", "value": "Una vulnerabilidad de denegaci\u00f3n de servicio (DoS) en FortiClient para Linux versiones 6.2.1 y posteriores, puede permitir a un usuario con privilegios bajos causar que los procesos de FortiClient se ejecuten bajo bloqueos de los privilegios root mediante el env\u00edo de peticiones del cliente IPC especialmente dise\u00f1adas hacia el proceso fctsched debido a que el nanomsg no ha sido validado correctamente." } ], "id": "CVE-2019-16152", "lastModified": "2024-11-21T04:30:09.340", "metrics": { "cvssMetricV2": [ { "acInsufInfo": false, "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM", "cvssData": { "accessComplexity": "LOW", "accessVector": "NETWORK", "authentication": "SINGLE", "availabilityImpact": "COMPLETE", "baseScore": 6.8, "confidentialityImpact": "NONE", "integrityImpact": "NONE", "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:N/I:N/A:C", "version": "2.0" }, "exploitabilityScore": 8.0, "impactScore": 6.9, "obtainAllPrivilege": false, "obtainOtherPrivilege": false, "obtainUserPrivilege": false, "source": "nvd@nist.gov", "type": "Primary", "userInteractionRequired": false } ], "cvssMetricV31": [ { "cvssData": { "attackComplexity": "LOW", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "baseScore": 6.5, "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM", "confidentialityImpact": "NONE", "integrityImpact": "NONE", "privilegesRequired": "LOW", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "userInteraction": "NONE", "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H", "version": "3.1" }, "exploitabilityScore": 2.8, "impactScore": 3.6, "source": "nvd@nist.gov", "type": "Primary" } ] }, "published": "2020-02-06T16:15:12.277", "references": [ { "source": "psirt@fortinet.com", "tags": [ "Exploit", "Third Party Advisory" ], "url": "https://danishcyberdefence.dk/blog/forticlient_linux" }, { "source": "psirt@fortinet.com", "tags": [ "Vendor Advisory" ], "url": "https://fortiguard.com/psirt/FG-IR-19-238" }, { "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", "tags": [ "Exploit", "Third Party Advisory" ], "url": "https://danishcyberdefence.dk/blog/forticlient_linux" }, { "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", "tags": [ "Vendor Advisory" ], "url": "https://fortiguard.com/psirt/FG-IR-19-238" } ], "sourceIdentifier": "psirt@fortinet.com", "vulnStatus": "Modified", "weaknesses": [ { "description": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "CWE-20" } ], "source": "nvd@nist.gov", "type": "Primary" } ] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…