fkie_cve-2020-27222
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2021-02-03 16:15
Modified
2024-11-21 05:20
Severity ?
Summary
In Eclipse Californium version 2.3.0 to 2.6.0, the certificate based (x509 and RPK) DTLS handshakes accidentally fails, because the DTLS server side sticks to a wrong internal state. That wrong internal state is set by a previous certificate based DTLS handshake failure with TLS parameter mismatch. The DTLS server side must be restarted to recover this. This allow clients to force a DoS.
References
▶ | URL | Tags | |
---|---|---|---|
emo@eclipse.org | https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=570844 | Permissions Required, Vendor Advisory | |
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108 | https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=570844 | Permissions Required, Vendor Advisory |
Impacted products
Vendor | Product | Version | |
---|---|---|---|
eclipse | californium | * |
{ "configurations": [ { "nodes": [ { "cpeMatch": [ { "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:eclipse:californium:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "matchCriteriaId": "56884583-F1FF-412F-B5E6-0AD0F904F260", "versionEndIncluding": "2.6.0", "versionStartIncluding": "2.3.0", "vulnerable": true } ], "negate": false, "operator": "OR" } ] } ], "cveTags": [], "descriptions": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "In Eclipse Californium version 2.3.0 to 2.6.0, the certificate based (x509 and RPK) DTLS handshakes accidentally fails, because the DTLS server side sticks to a wrong internal state. That wrong internal state is set by a previous certificate based DTLS handshake failure with TLS parameter mismatch. The DTLS server side must be restarted to recover this. This allow clients to force a DoS." }, { "lang": "es", "value": "En Eclipse Californium versiones 2.3.0 hasta 2.6.0, los protocolos de enlace DTLS basados ??en certificados (x509 y RPK) cometen un fallo accidentalmente, porque el lado del servidor DTLS se adhiere a un estado interno equivocado.\u0026#xa0;Ese estado interno equivocado es ajustado por medio de un fallo de protocolo de enlace DTLS basada en un certificado anterior con una falta de coincidencia de los par\u00e1metros TLS.\u0026#xa0;El lado del servidor DTLS debe reiniciarse para recuperar esto.\u0026#xa0;Esto permite a clientes forzar una DoS" } ], "id": "CVE-2020-27222", "lastModified": "2024-11-21T05:20:53.557", "metrics": { "cvssMetricV2": [ { "acInsufInfo": false, "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM", "cvssData": { "accessComplexity": "LOW", "accessVector": "NETWORK", "authentication": "NONE", "availabilityImpact": "PARTIAL", "baseScore": 5.0, "confidentialityImpact": "NONE", "integrityImpact": "NONE", "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P", "version": "2.0" }, "exploitabilityScore": 10.0, "impactScore": 2.9, "obtainAllPrivilege": false, "obtainOtherPrivilege": false, "obtainUserPrivilege": false, "source": "nvd@nist.gov", "type": "Primary", "userInteractionRequired": false } ], "cvssMetricV31": [ { "cvssData": { "attackComplexity": "LOW", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "baseScore": 7.5, "baseSeverity": "HIGH", "confidentialityImpact": "NONE", "integrityImpact": "NONE", "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "userInteraction": "NONE", "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H", "version": "3.1" }, "exploitabilityScore": 3.9, "impactScore": 3.6, "source": "nvd@nist.gov", "type": "Primary" } ] }, "published": "2021-02-03T16:15:13.117", "references": [ { "source": "emo@eclipse.org", "tags": [ "Permissions Required", "Vendor Advisory" ], "url": "https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=570844" }, { "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", "tags": [ "Permissions Required", "Vendor Advisory" ], "url": "https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=570844" } ], "sourceIdentifier": "emo@eclipse.org", "vulnStatus": "Modified", "weaknesses": [ { "description": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "CWE-372" } ], "source": "emo@eclipse.org", "type": "Secondary" }, { "description": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "NVD-CWE-Other" } ], "source": "nvd@nist.gov", "type": "Primary" } ] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…