fkie_cve-2022-22820
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2022-01-20 12:15
Modified
2024-11-21 06:47
Severity ?
5.5 (Medium) - CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Summary
Due to the lack of media file checks before rendering, it was possible for an attacker to cause abnormal CPU consumption for message recipient by sending specially crafted gif image in LINE for Windows before 7.4.
References
dl_cve@linecorp.comhttps://hackerone.com/reports/1357400Permissions Required
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108https://hackerone.com/reports/1357400Permissions Required
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
linecorp line *


To clipboard 

{
  "configurations": [
    {
      "nodes": [
        {
          "cpeMatch": [
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:linecorp:line:*:*:*:*:*:windows:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "61717960-C6DB-4540-9202-E2C541770836",
              "versionEndExcluding": "7.4.0",
              "vulnerable": true
            }
          ],
          "negate": false,
          "operator": "OR"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "Due to the lack of media file checks before rendering, it was possible for an attacker to cause abnormal CPU consumption for message recipient by sending specially crafted gif image in LINE for Windows before 7.4."
    },
    {
      "lang": "es",
      "value": "Debido a una falta de comprobaciones de archivos multimedia antes de la renderizaci\u00f3n, era posible que un atacante causara un consumo anormal de CPU para el destinatario del mensaje mediante el env\u00edo de una imagen gif especialmente dise\u00f1ada en LINE para Windows versiones anteriores a 7.4"
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2022-22820",
  "lastModified": "2024-11-21T06:47:31.007",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV2": [
      {
        "acInsufInfo": false,
        "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
        "cvssData": {
          "accessComplexity": "MEDIUM",
          "accessVector": "NETWORK",
          "authentication": "NONE",
          "availabilityImpact": "PARTIAL",
          "baseScore": 4.3,
          "confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
          "integrityImpact": "NONE",
          "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P",
          "version": "2.0"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 8.6,
        "impactScore": 2.9,
        "obtainAllPrivilege": false,
        "obtainOtherPrivilege": false,
        "obtainUserPrivilege": false,
        "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
        "type": "Primary",
        "userInteractionRequired": true
      }
    ],
    "cvssMetricV31": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "LOW",
          "attackVector": "LOCAL",
          "availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
          "baseScore": 5.5,
          "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
          "confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
          "integrityImpact": "NONE",
          "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
          "scope": "UNCHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 1.8,
        "impactScore": 3.6,
        "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
        "type": "Primary"
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2022-01-20T12:15:08.727",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "dl_cve@linecorp.com",
      "tags": [
        "Permissions Required"
      ],
      "url": "https://hackerone.com/reports/1357400"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "tags": [
        "Permissions Required"
      ],
      "url": "https://hackerone.com/reports/1357400"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "dl_cve@linecorp.com",
  "vulnStatus": "Modified",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-20"
        }
      ],
      "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
      "type": "Primary"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.