fkie_cve-2022-35961
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2022-08-15 11:21
Modified
2024-11-21 07:12
Severity ?
7.9 (High) - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L
6.5 (Medium) - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Summary
OpenZeppelin Contracts is a library for secure smart contract development. The functions `ECDSA.recover` and `ECDSA.tryRecover` are vulnerable to a kind of signature malleability due to accepting EIP-2098 compact signatures in addition to the traditional 65 byte signature format. This is only an issue for the functions that take a single `bytes` argument, and not the functions that take `r, v, s` or `r, vs` as separate arguments. The potentially affected contracts are those that implement signature reuse or replay protection by marking the signature itself as used rather than the signed message or a nonce included in it. A user may take a signature that has already been submitted, submit it again in a different form, and bypass this protection. The issue has been patched in 4.7.3.
References
security-advisories@github.comhttps://github.com/OpenZeppelin/openzeppelin-contracts/pull/3610Patch, Third Party Advisory
security-advisories@github.comhttps://github.com/OpenZeppelin/openzeppelin-contracts/releases/tag/v4.7.3Release Notes, Third Party Advisory
security-advisories@github.comhttps://github.com/OpenZeppelin/openzeppelin-contracts/security/advisories/GHSA-4h98-2769-gh6hThird Party Advisory
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/openzeppelin-contracts/pull/3610Patch, Third Party Advisory
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/openzeppelin-contracts/releases/tag/v4.7.3Release Notes, Third Party Advisory
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/openzeppelin-contracts/security/advisories/GHSA-4h98-2769-gh6hThird Party Advisory
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
openzeppelin contracts *
openzeppelin contracts_upgradeable *


To clipboard 

{
  "configurations": [
    {
      "nodes": [
        {
          "cpeMatch": [
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:openzeppelin:contracts:*:*:*:*:*:node.js:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "AED17687-AC6E-4A9D-A543-91B9B56CEC55",
              "versionEndExcluding": "4.7.3",
              "versionStartIncluding": "4.1.0",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:openzeppelin:contracts_upgradeable:*:*:*:*:*:node.js:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "FA57CB0E-BCBA-4C14-84FC-18302CD85575",
              "versionEndExcluding": "4.7.3",
              "versionStartIncluding": "4.1.0",
              "vulnerable": true
            }
          ],
          "negate": false,
          "operator": "OR"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "OpenZeppelin Contracts is a library for secure smart contract development. The functions `ECDSA.recover` and `ECDSA.tryRecover` are vulnerable to a kind of signature malleability due to accepting EIP-2098 compact signatures in addition to the traditional 65 byte signature format. This is only an issue for the functions that take a single `bytes` argument, and not the functions that take `r, v, s` or `r, vs` as separate arguments. The potentially affected contracts are those that implement signature reuse or replay protection by marking the signature itself as used rather than the signed message or a nonce included in it. A user may take a signature that has already been submitted, submit it again in a different form, and bypass this protection. The issue has been patched in 4.7.3."
    },
    {
      "lang": "es",
      "value": "OpenZeppelin Contracts es una biblioteca para el desarrollo de contratos inteligentes seguros. Las funciones \"ECDSA.recover\" y \"ECDSA.tryRecover\" son vulnerables a un tipo de maleabilidad de la firma debido a que aceptan firmas compactas EIP-2098 adem\u00e1s del formato de firma tradicional de 65 bytes. Esto s\u00f3lo es un problema para las funciones que toman un \u00fanico argumento \"bytes\", y no las funciones que toman \"r, v, s\" o \"r, vs\" como argumentos separados. Los contratos potencialmente afectados son los que implementan el re\u00faso de la firma o la protecci\u00f3n contra repeticiones al marcar la propia firma como usada en lugar del mensaje firmado o un nonce incluido en \u00e9l. Un usuario puede tomar una firma que ya ha sido enviada, enviarla de nuevo en una forma diferente, y omitir esta protecci\u00f3n. El problema ha sido parcheado en versi\u00f3n 4.7.3."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2022-35961",
  "lastModified": "2024-11-21T07:12:03.497",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV31": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "HIGH",
          "attackVector": "NETWORK",
          "availabilityImpact": "LOW",
          "baseScore": 7.9,
          "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
          "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
          "integrityImpact": "HIGH",
          "privilegesRequired": "LOW",
          "scope": "CHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 1.3,
        "impactScore": 6.0,
        "source": "security-advisories@github.com",
        "type": "Secondary"
      },
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "LOW",
          "attackVector": "NETWORK",
          "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
          "baseScore": 6.5,
          "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
          "confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
          "integrityImpact": "HIGH",
          "privilegesRequired": "LOW",
          "scope": "UNCHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "NONE",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 2.8,
        "impactScore": 3.6,
        "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
        "type": "Primary"
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2022-08-15T11:21:39.937",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "security-advisories@github.com",
      "tags": [
        "Patch",
        "Third Party Advisory"
      ],
      "url": "https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/openzeppelin-contracts/pull/3610"
    },
    {
      "source": "security-advisories@github.com",
      "tags": [
        "Release Notes",
        "Third Party Advisory"
      ],
      "url": "https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/openzeppelin-contracts/releases/tag/v4.7.3"
    },
    {
      "source": "security-advisories@github.com",
      "tags": [
        "Third Party Advisory"
      ],
      "url": "https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/openzeppelin-contracts/security/advisories/GHSA-4h98-2769-gh6h"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "tags": [
        "Patch",
        "Third Party Advisory"
      ],
      "url": "https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/openzeppelin-contracts/pull/3610"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "tags": [
        "Release Notes",
        "Third Party Advisory"
      ],
      "url": "https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/openzeppelin-contracts/releases/tag/v4.7.3"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "tags": [
        "Third Party Advisory"
      ],
      "url": "https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/openzeppelin-contracts/security/advisories/GHSA-4h98-2769-gh6h"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "security-advisories@github.com",
  "vulnStatus": "Modified",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-354"
        }
      ],
      "source": "security-advisories@github.com",
      "type": "Primary"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.