fkie_cve-2022-49340
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2025-02-26 07:01
Modified
2025-02-26 07:01
Severity ?
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ip_gre: test csum_start instead of transport header GRE with TUNNEL_CSUM will apply local checksum offload on CHECKSUM_PARTIAL packets. ipgre_xmit must validate csum_start after an optional skb_pull, else lco_csum may trigger an overflow. The original check was if (csum && skb_checksum_start(skb) < skb->data) return -EINVAL; This had false positives when skb_checksum_start is undefined: when ip_summed is not CHECKSUM_PARTIAL. A discussed refinement was straightforward if (csum && skb->ip_summed == CHECKSUM_PARTIAL && skb_checksum_start(skb) < skb->data) return -EINVAL; But was eventually revised more thoroughly: - restrict the check to the only branch where needed, in an uncommon GRE path that uses header_ops and calls skb_pull. - test skb_transport_header, which is set along with csum_start in skb_partial_csum_set in the normal header_ops datapath. Turns out skbs can arrive in this branch without the transport header set, e.g., through BPF redirection. Revise the check back to check csum_start directly, and only if CHECKSUM_PARTIAL. Do leave the check in the updated location. Check field regardless of whether TUNNEL_CSUM is configured.
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version



{
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nip_gre: test csum_start instead of transport header\n\nGRE with TUNNEL_CSUM will apply local checksum offload on\nCHECKSUM_PARTIAL packets.\n\nipgre_xmit must validate csum_start after an optional skb_pull,\nelse lco_csum may trigger an overflow. The original check was\n\n\tif (csum \u0026\u0026 skb_checksum_start(skb) \u003c skb-\u003edata)\n\t\treturn -EINVAL;\n\nThis had false positives when skb_checksum_start is undefined:\nwhen ip_summed is not CHECKSUM_PARTIAL. A discussed refinement\nwas straightforward\n\n\tif (csum \u0026\u0026 skb-\u003eip_summed == CHECKSUM_PARTIAL \u0026\u0026\n\t    skb_checksum_start(skb) \u003c skb-\u003edata)\n\t\treturn -EINVAL;\n\nBut was eventually revised more thoroughly:\n- restrict the check to the only branch where needed, in an\n  uncommon GRE path that uses header_ops and calls skb_pull.\n- test skb_transport_header, which is set along with csum_start\n  in skb_partial_csum_set in the normal header_ops datapath.\n\nTurns out skbs can arrive in this branch without the transport\nheader set, e.g., through BPF redirection.\n\nRevise the check back to check csum_start directly, and only if\nCHECKSUM_PARTIAL. Do leave the check in the updated location.\nCheck field regardless of whether TUNNEL_CSUM is configured."
    },
    {
      "lang": "es",
      "value": "En el kernel de Linux, se ha resuelto la siguiente vulnerabilidad: ip_gre: prueba csum_start en lugar del encabezado de transporte GRE con TUNNEL_CSUM aplicar\u00e1 la descarga de suma de comprobaci\u00f3n local en los paquetes CHECKSUM_PARTIAL. ipgre_xmit debe validar csum_start despu\u00e9s de un skb_pull opcional, de lo contrario lco_csum puede provocar un desbordamiento. La comprobaci\u00f3n original era if (csum \u0026amp;\u0026amp; skb_checksum_start(skb) \u0026lt; skb-\u0026gt;data) return -EINVAL; Esto ten\u00eda falsos positivos cuando skb_checksum_start no est\u00e1 definido: cuando ip_summed no es CHECKSUM_PARTIAL. Una mejora discutida fue sencilla if (csum \u0026amp;\u0026amp; skb-\u0026gt;ip_summed == CHECKSUM_PARTIAL \u0026amp;\u0026amp; skb_checksum_start(skb) \u0026lt; skb-\u0026gt;data) return -EINVAL; Pero finalmente se revis\u00f3 m\u00e1s a fondo: - restringir la verificaci\u00f3n a la \u00fanica rama donde sea necesario, en una ruta GRE poco com\u00fan que usa header_ops y llama a skb_pull. - probar skb_transport_header, que se establece junto con csum_start en skb_partial_csum_set en la ruta de datos header_ops normal. Resulta que skbs puede llegar a esta rama sin el encabezado de transporte establecido, por ejemplo, a trav\u00e9s de la redirecci\u00f3n BPF. Revise la verificaci\u00f3n nuevamente para verificar csum_start directamente, y solo si CHECKSUM_PARTIAL. Deje la verificaci\u00f3n en la ubicaci\u00f3n actualizada. Verifique el campo independientemente de si TUNNEL_CSUM est\u00e1 configurado."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2022-49340",
  "lastModified": "2025-02-26T07:01:10.753",
  "metrics": {},
  "published": "2025-02-26T07:01:10.753",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0c92d813c7c9ca2212ecd879232e7d87362fce98"
    },
    {
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0ffa268724656633af5f37a38c212326d98ebe8c"
    },
    {
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3d08bc3a5d9b2106f5c8bcf1adb73147824aa006"
    },
    {
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7596bd7920985f7fc8579a92e48bc53ce4475b21"
    },
    {
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8d21e9963bec1aad2280cdd034c8993033ef2948"
    },
    {
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e6b6f98fc7605c06c0a3baa70f62c534d7b4ce58"
    },
    {
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/fbeb8dfa8b87ef259eef0c89e39b53962a3cf604"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
  "vulnStatus": "Awaiting Analysis"
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.


Loading…

Loading…