fkie_cve-2022-49779
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2025-05-01 15:16
Modified
2025-05-02 13:53
Severity ?
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: kprobes: Skip clearing aggrprobe's post_handler in kprobe-on-ftrace case In __unregister_kprobe_top(), if the currently unregistered probe has post_handler but other child probes of the aggrprobe do not have post_handler, the post_handler of the aggrprobe is cleared. If this is a ftrace-based probe, there is a problem. In later calls to disarm_kprobe(), we will use kprobe_ftrace_ops because post_handler is NULL. But we're armed with kprobe_ipmodify_ops. This triggers a WARN in __disarm_kprobe_ftrace() and may even cause use-after-free: Failed to disarm kprobe-ftrace at kernel_clone+0x0/0x3c0 (error -2) WARNING: CPU: 5 PID: 137 at kernel/kprobes.c:1135 __disarm_kprobe_ftrace.isra.21+0xcf/0xe0 Modules linked in: testKprobe_007(-) CPU: 5 PID: 137 Comm: rmmod Not tainted 6.1.0-rc4-dirty #18 [...] Call Trace: <TASK> __disable_kprobe+0xcd/0xe0 __unregister_kprobe_top+0x12/0x150 ? mutex_lock+0xe/0x30 unregister_kprobes.part.23+0x31/0xa0 unregister_kprobe+0x32/0x40 __x64_sys_delete_module+0x15e/0x260 ? do_user_addr_fault+0x2cd/0x6b0 do_syscall_64+0x3a/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd [...] For the kprobe-on-ftrace case, we keep the post_handler setting to identify this aggrprobe armed with kprobe_ipmodify_ops. This way we can disarm it correctly.
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version



{
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nkprobes: Skip clearing aggrprobe\u0027s post_handler in kprobe-on-ftrace case\n\nIn __unregister_kprobe_top(), if the currently unregistered probe has\npost_handler but other child probes of the aggrprobe do not have\npost_handler, the post_handler of the aggrprobe is cleared. If this is\na ftrace-based probe, there is a problem. In later calls to\ndisarm_kprobe(), we will use kprobe_ftrace_ops because post_handler is\nNULL. But we\u0027re armed with kprobe_ipmodify_ops. This triggers a WARN in\n__disarm_kprobe_ftrace() and may even cause use-after-free:\n\n  Failed to disarm kprobe-ftrace at kernel_clone+0x0/0x3c0 (error -2)\n  WARNING: CPU: 5 PID: 137 at kernel/kprobes.c:1135 __disarm_kprobe_ftrace.isra.21+0xcf/0xe0\n  Modules linked in: testKprobe_007(-)\n  CPU: 5 PID: 137 Comm: rmmod Not tainted 6.1.0-rc4-dirty #18\n  [...]\n  Call Trace:\n   \u003cTASK\u003e\n   __disable_kprobe+0xcd/0xe0\n   __unregister_kprobe_top+0x12/0x150\n   ? mutex_lock+0xe/0x30\n   unregister_kprobes.part.23+0x31/0xa0\n   unregister_kprobe+0x32/0x40\n   __x64_sys_delete_module+0x15e/0x260\n   ? do_user_addr_fault+0x2cd/0x6b0\n   do_syscall_64+0x3a/0x90\n   entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd\n   [...]\n\nFor the kprobe-on-ftrace case, we keep the post_handler setting to\nidentify this aggrprobe armed with kprobe_ipmodify_ops. This way we\ncan disarm it correctly."
    },
    {
      "lang": "es",
      "value": "En el kernel de Linux, se ha resuelto la siguiente vulnerabilidad: kprobes: Omitir la limpieza del post_handler de aggrprobe en el caso de kprobe-on-ftrace. En __unregister_kprobe_top(), si la sonda actualmente no registrada tiene post_handler, pero otras sondas secundarias de aggrprobe no lo tienen, se limpia el post_handler de aggrprobe. Si se trata de una sonda basada en ftrace, existe un problema. En llamadas posteriores a disarm_kprobe(), usaremos kprobe_ftrace_ops porque post_handler es NULL. Pero estamos preparados con kprobe_ipmodify_ops. Esto activa una ADVERTENCIA en __disarm_kprobe_ftrace() e incluso puede provocar un use-after-free: No se pudo desarmar kprobe-ftrace en kernel_clone+0x0/0x3c0 (error -2) ADVERTENCIA: CPU: 5 PID: 137 en kernel/kprobes.c:1135 __disarm_kprobe_ftrace.isra.21+0xcf/0xe0 M\u00f3dulos vinculados en: testKprobe_007(-) CPU: 5 PID: 137 Comm: rmmod No contaminado 6.1.0-rc4-dirty #18 [...] Seguimiento de llamadas:  __disable_kprobe+0xcd/0xe0 __unregister_kprobe_top+0x12/0x150 ? mutex_lock+0xe/0x30 unregister_kprobes.part.23+0x31/0xa0 unregister_kprobe+0x32/0x40 __x64_sys_delete_module+0x15e/0x260 ? do_user_addr_fault+0x2cd/0x6b0 do_syscall_64+0x3a/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd [...] For the kprobe-on-ftrace case, we keep the post_handler setting to identify this aggrprobe armed with kprobe_ipmodify_ops. De esta forma, podemos desactivarla correctamente."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2022-49779",
  "lastModified": "2025-05-02T13:53:20.943",
  "metrics": {},
  "published": "2025-05-01T15:16:01.080",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/55788ebbe8b365b4375bd56b4ba7db79d393a370"
    },
    {
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5dd7caf0bdc5d0bae7cf9776b4d739fb09bd5ebb"
    },
    {
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7b0007b28dd970176f2e297c06ae63eea2447127"
    },
    {
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7d606ae1abcc3eab5408e42444d789dc7def51b8"
    },
    {
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c49cc2c059b503e962c2f13a806c105f9b757df4"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
  "vulnStatus": "Awaiting Analysis"
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.


Loading…

Loading…