fkie_cve-2022-49837
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2025-05-01 15:16
Modified
2025-05-07 13:33
Severity ?
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
bpf: Fix memory leaks in __check_func_call
kmemleak reports this issue:
unreferenced object 0xffff88817139d000 (size 2048):
comm "test_progs", pid 33246, jiffies 4307381979 (age 45851.820s)
hex dump (first 32 bytes):
01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
backtrace:
[<0000000045f075f0>] kmalloc_trace+0x27/0xa0
[<0000000098b7c90a>] __check_func_call+0x316/0x1230
[<00000000b4c3c403>] check_helper_call+0x172e/0x4700
[<00000000aa3875b7>] do_check+0x21d8/0x45e0
[<000000001147357b>] do_check_common+0x767/0xaf0
[<00000000b5a595b4>] bpf_check+0x43e3/0x5bc0
[<0000000011e391b1>] bpf_prog_load+0xf26/0x1940
[<0000000007f765c0>] __sys_bpf+0xd2c/0x3650
[<00000000839815d6>] __x64_sys_bpf+0x75/0xc0
[<00000000946ee250>] do_syscall_64+0x3b/0x90
[<0000000000506b7f>] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
The root case here is: In function prepare_func_exit(), the callee is
not released in the abnormal scenario after "state->curframe--;". To
fix, move "state->curframe--;" to the very bottom of the function,
right when we free callee and reset frame[] pointer to NULL, as Andrii
suggested.
In addition, function __check_func_call() has a similar problem. In
the abnormal scenario before "state->curframe++;", the callee also
should be released by free_func_state().
References
Impacted products
Vendor | Product | Version | |
---|---|---|---|
linux | linux_kernel | * | |
linux | linux_kernel | * | |
linux | linux_kernel | 6.1 | |
linux | linux_kernel | 6.1 | |
linux | linux_kernel | 6.1 | |
linux | linux_kernel | 6.1 | |
linux | linux_kernel | 6.1 |
{ "configurations": [ { "nodes": [ { "cpeMatch": [ { "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "matchCriteriaId": "19E8FB68-6A3C-43C9-82F9-900E6D4954AC", "versionEndExcluding": "5.15.80", "versionStartIncluding": "4.20", "vulnerable": true }, { "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "matchCriteriaId": "64F9ADD1-3ADB-4D66-A00F-4A83010B05F0", "versionEndExcluding": "6.0.10", "versionStartIncluding": "5.16", "vulnerable": true }, { "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.1:rc1:*:*:*:*:*:*", "matchCriteriaId": "E7E331DA-1FB0-4DEC-91AC-7DA69D461C11", "vulnerable": true }, { "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.1:rc2:*:*:*:*:*:*", "matchCriteriaId": "17F0B248-42CF-4AE6-A469-BB1BAE7F4705", "vulnerable": true }, { "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.1:rc3:*:*:*:*:*:*", "matchCriteriaId": "E2422816-0C14-4B5E-A1E6-A9D776E5C49B", "vulnerable": true }, { "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.1:rc4:*:*:*:*:*:*", "matchCriteriaId": "1C6E00FE-5FB9-4D20-A1A1-5A32128F9B76", "vulnerable": true }, { "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.1:rc5:*:*:*:*:*:*", "matchCriteriaId": "35B26BE4-43A6-4A36-A7F6-5B3F572D9186", "vulnerable": true } ], "negate": false, "operator": "OR" } ] } ], "cveTags": [], "descriptions": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nbpf: Fix memory leaks in __check_func_call\n\nkmemleak reports this issue:\n\nunreferenced object 0xffff88817139d000 (size 2048):\n comm \"test_progs\", pid 33246, jiffies 4307381979 (age 45851.820s)\n hex dump (first 32 bytes):\n 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................\n 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................\n backtrace:\n [\u003c0000000045f075f0\u003e] kmalloc_trace+0x27/0xa0\n [\u003c0000000098b7c90a\u003e] __check_func_call+0x316/0x1230\n [\u003c00000000b4c3c403\u003e] check_helper_call+0x172e/0x4700\n [\u003c00000000aa3875b7\u003e] do_check+0x21d8/0x45e0\n [\u003c000000001147357b\u003e] do_check_common+0x767/0xaf0\n [\u003c00000000b5a595b4\u003e] bpf_check+0x43e3/0x5bc0\n [\u003c0000000011e391b1\u003e] bpf_prog_load+0xf26/0x1940\n [\u003c0000000007f765c0\u003e] __sys_bpf+0xd2c/0x3650\n [\u003c00000000839815d6\u003e] __x64_sys_bpf+0x75/0xc0\n [\u003c00000000946ee250\u003e] do_syscall_64+0x3b/0x90\n [\u003c0000000000506b7f\u003e] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd\n\nThe root case here is: In function prepare_func_exit(), the callee is\nnot released in the abnormal scenario after \"state-\u003ecurframe--;\". To\nfix, move \"state-\u003ecurframe--;\" to the very bottom of the function,\nright when we free callee and reset frame[] pointer to NULL, as Andrii\nsuggested.\n\nIn addition, function __check_func_call() has a similar problem. In\nthe abnormal scenario before \"state-\u003ecurframe++;\", the callee also\nshould be released by free_func_state()." }, { "lang": "es", "value": "En el kernel de Linux, se ha resuelto la siguiente vulnerabilidad: bpf: Se corrigen fugas de memoria en __check_func_call kmemleak informa de este problema: objeto sin referencia 0xffff88817139d000 (tama\u00f1o 2048): comm \"test_progs\", pid 33246, jiffies 4307381979 (edad 45851.820s) volcado hexadecimal (primeros 32 bytes): 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ backtrace: [\u0026lt;0000000045f075f0\u0026gt;] kmalloc_trace+0x27/0xa0 [\u0026lt;0000000098b7c90a\u0026gt;] __check_func_call+0x316/0x1230 [\u0026lt;00000000b4c3c403\u0026gt;] check_helper_call+0x172e/0x4700 [\u0026lt;00000000aa3875b7\u0026gt;] do_check+0x21d8/0x45e0 [\u0026lt;000000001147357b\u0026gt;] do_check_common+0x767/0xaf0 [\u0026lt;00000000b5a595b4\u0026gt;] bpf_check+0x43e3/0x5bc0 [\u0026lt;0000000011e391b1\u0026gt;] bpf_prog_load+0xf26/0x1940 [\u0026lt;0000000007f765c0\u0026gt;] __sys_bpf+0xd2c/0x3650 [\u0026lt;00000000839815d6\u0026gt;] __x64_sys_bpf+0x75/0xc0 [\u0026lt;00000000946ee250\u0026gt;] do_syscall_64+0x3b/0x90 [\u0026lt;0000000000506b7f\u0026gt;] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd El caso ra\u00edz aqu\u00ed es: En la funci\u00f3n prepare_func_exit(), el llamado no se libera en el escenario anormal despu\u00e9s de \"state-\u0026gt;curframe--;\". Para solucionarlo, mueva \"state-\u0026gt;curframe--;\" al final de la funci\u00f3n, justo cuando liberamos al destinatario y restablecemos el puntero frame[] a NULL, como sugiri\u00f3 Andrii. Adem\u00e1s, la funci\u00f3n __check_func_call() presenta un problema similar. En el escenario anormal anterior a \"state-\u0026gt;curframe++;\", el destinatario tambi\u00e9n deber\u00eda ser liberado por free_func_state()." } ], "id": "CVE-2022-49837", "lastModified": "2025-05-07T13:33:13.787", "metrics": { "cvssMetricV31": [ { "cvssData": { "attackComplexity": "LOW", "attackVector": "LOCAL", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "baseScore": 5.5, "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM", "confidentialityImpact": "NONE", "integrityImpact": "NONE", "privilegesRequired": "LOW", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "userInteraction": "NONE", "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H", "version": "3.1" }, "exploitabilityScore": 1.8, "impactScore": 3.6, "source": "nvd@nist.gov", "type": "Primary" } ] }, "published": "2025-05-01T15:16:07.187", "references": [ { "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", "tags": [ "Patch" ], "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/83946d772e756734a900ef99dbe0aeda506adf37" }, { "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", "tags": [ "Patch" ], "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d4944497827a3d14bc5a26dbcfb7433eb5a956c0" }, { "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", "tags": [ "Patch" ], "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/eb86559a691cea5fa63e57a03ec3dc9c31e97955" } ], "sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", "vulnStatus": "Analyzed", "weaknesses": [ { "description": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "CWE-401" } ], "source": "nvd@nist.gov", "type": "Primary" } ] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…