fkie_cve-2022-49993
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2025-06-18 11:15
Modified
2025-06-18 13:46
Severity ?
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: loop: Check for overflow while configuring loop The userspace can configure a loop using an ioctl call, wherein a configuration of type loop_config is passed (see lo_ioctl()'s case on line 1550 of drivers/block/loop.c). This proceeds to call loop_configure() which in turn calls loop_set_status_from_info() (see line 1050 of loop.c), passing &config->info which is of type loop_info64*. This function then sets the appropriate values, like the offset. loop_device has lo_offset of type loff_t (see line 52 of loop.c), which is typdef-chained to long long, whereas loop_info64 has lo_offset of type __u64 (see line 56 of include/uapi/linux/loop.h). The function directly copies offset from info to the device as follows (See line 980 of loop.c): lo->lo_offset = info->lo_offset; This results in an overflow, which triggers a warning in iomap_iter() due to a call to iomap_iter_done() which has: WARN_ON_ONCE(iter->iomap.offset > iter->pos); Thus, check for negative value during loop_set_status_from_info(). Bug report: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=c620fe14aac810396d3c3edc9ad73848bf69a29e
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version



{
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nloop: Check for overflow while configuring loop\n\nThe userspace can configure a loop using an ioctl call, wherein\na configuration of type loop_config is passed (see lo_ioctl()\u0027s\ncase on line 1550 of drivers/block/loop.c). This proceeds to call\nloop_configure() which in turn calls loop_set_status_from_info()\n(see line 1050 of loop.c), passing \u0026config-\u003einfo which is of type\nloop_info64*. This function then sets the appropriate values, like\nthe offset.\n\nloop_device has lo_offset of type loff_t (see line 52 of loop.c),\nwhich is typdef-chained to long long, whereas loop_info64 has\nlo_offset of type __u64 (see line 56 of include/uapi/linux/loop.h).\n\nThe function directly copies offset from info to the device as\nfollows (See line 980 of loop.c):\n\tlo-\u003elo_offset = info-\u003elo_offset;\n\nThis results in an overflow, which triggers a warning in iomap_iter()\ndue to a call to iomap_iter_done() which has:\n\tWARN_ON_ONCE(iter-\u003eiomap.offset \u003e iter-\u003epos);\n\nThus, check for negative value during loop_set_status_from_info().\n\nBug report: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=c620fe14aac810396d3c3edc9ad73848bf69a29e"
    },
    {
      "lang": "es",
      "value": "En el kernel de Linux, se ha resuelto la siguiente vulnerabilidad: loop: Comprobar si hay desbordamiento al configurar loop El espacio de usuario puede configurar un bucle mediante una llamada ioctl, en la que se pasa una configuraci\u00f3n de tipo loop_config (consulte el caso de lo_ioctl() en la l\u00ednea 1550 de drivers/block/loop.c). Esto procede a llamar a loop_configure() que a su vez llama a loop_set_status_from_info() (consulte la l\u00ednea 1050 de loop.c), pasando \u0026amp;config-\u0026gt;info que es de tipo loop_info64*. Esta funci\u00f3n luego establece los valores apropiados, como el desplazamiento. loop_device tiene lo_offset de tipo loff_t (consulte la l\u00ednea 52 de loop.c), que est\u00e1 encadenado por typdef a long long, mientras que loop_info64 tiene lo_offset de tipo __u64 (consulte la l\u00ednea 56 de include/uapi/linux/loop.h). La funci\u00f3n copia directamente el desplazamiento de info al dispositivo como se indica a continuaci\u00f3n (v\u00e9ase la l\u00ednea 980 de loop.c): lo-\u0026gt;lo_offset = info-\u0026gt;lo_offset; Esto genera un desbordamiento que genera una advertencia en iomap_iter() debido a una llamada a iomap_iter_done() que tiene: WARN_ON_ONCE(iter-\u0026gt;iomap.offset \u0026gt; iter-\u0026gt;pos); Por lo tanto, se debe verificar si hay un valor negativo durante loop_set_status_from_info(). Informe de error: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=c620fe14aac810396d3c3edc9ad73848bf69a29e"
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2022-49993",
  "lastModified": "2025-06-18T13:46:52.973",
  "metrics": {},
  "published": "2025-06-18T11:15:26.977",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0455bef69028c65065f16bb04635591b2374249b"
    },
    {
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/18e28817cb516b39de6281f6db9b0618b2cc7b42"
    },
    {
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6858933131d0dadac071c4d33335a9ea4b8e76cf"
    },
    {
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/9be7fa7ead18a48940df7b59d993bbc8b9055c15"
    },
    {
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a217715338fd48f72114725aa7a40e484a781ca7"
    },
    {
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/adf0112d9b8acb03485624220b4934f69bf13369"
    },
    {
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b40877b8562c5720d0a7fce20729f56b75a3dede"
    },
    {
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c490a0b5a4f36da3918181a8acdc6991d967c5f3"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
  "vulnStatus": "Awaiting Analysis"
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.


Loading…

Loading…