fkie_cve-2022-50058
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2025-06-18 11:15
Modified
2025-06-18 13:47
Severity ?
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
vdpa_sim_blk: set number of address spaces and virtqueue groups
Commit bda324fd037a ("vdpasim: control virtqueue support") added two
new fields (nas, ngroups) to vdpasim_dev_attr, but we forgot to
initialize them for vdpa_sim_blk.
When creating a new vdpa_sim_blk device this causes the kernel
to panic in this way:
$ vdpa dev add mgmtdev vdpasim_blk name blk0
BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000030
...
RIP: 0010:vhost_iotlb_add_range_ctx+0x41/0x220 [vhost_iotlb]
...
Call Trace:
<TASK>
vhost_iotlb_add_range+0x11/0x800 [vhost_iotlb]
vdpasim_map_range+0x91/0xd0 [vdpa_sim]
vdpasim_alloc_coherent+0x56/0x90 [vdpa_sim]
...
This happens because vdpasim->iommu[0] is not initialized when
dev_attr.nas is 0.
Let's fix this issue by initializing both (nas, ngroups) to 1 for
vdpa_sim_blk.
References
Impacted products
Vendor | Product | Version |
---|
{ "cveTags": [], "descriptions": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nvdpa_sim_blk: set number of address spaces and virtqueue groups\n\nCommit bda324fd037a (\"vdpasim: control virtqueue support\") added two\nnew fields (nas, ngroups) to vdpasim_dev_attr, but we forgot to\ninitialize them for vdpa_sim_blk.\n\nWhen creating a new vdpa_sim_blk device this causes the kernel\nto panic in this way:\n \u00a0 \u00a0$ vdpa dev add mgmtdev vdpasim_blk name blk0\n \u00a0 \u00a0BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000030\n \u00a0 \u00a0...\n \u00a0 \u00a0RIP: 0010:vhost_iotlb_add_range_ctx+0x41/0x220 [vhost_iotlb]\n \u00a0 \u00a0...\n \u00a0 \u00a0Call Trace:\n \u00a0 \u00a0 \u003cTASK\u003e\n \u00a0 \u00a0 vhost_iotlb_add_range+0x11/0x800 [vhost_iotlb]\n \u00a0 \u00a0 vdpasim_map_range+0x91/0xd0 [vdpa_sim]\n \u00a0 \u00a0 vdpasim_alloc_coherent+0x56/0x90 [vdpa_sim]\n \u00a0 \u00a0 ...\n\nThis happens because vdpasim-\u003eiommu[0] is not initialized when\ndev_attr.nas is 0.\n\nLet\u0027s fix this issue by initializing both (nas, ngroups) to 1 for\nvdpa_sim_blk." }, { "lang": "es", "value": "En el kernel de Linux, se ha resuelto la siguiente vulnerabilidad: vdpa_sim_blk: establecer el n\u00famero de espacios de direcciones y grupos virtqueue. el commit bda324fd037a (\"vdpasim: controlar la compatibilidad con virtqueue\") agreg\u00f3 dos nuevos campos (nas, ngroups) a vdpasim_dev_attr, pero olvidamos inicializarlos para vdpa_sim_blk. Al crear un nuevo dispositivo vdpa_sim_blk esto hace que el kernel entre en p\u00e1nico de esta manera: $ vdpa dev add mgmtdev vdpasim_blk name blk0 BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000030 ... RIP: 0010:vhost_iotlb_add_range_ctx+0x41/0x220 [vhost_iotlb] ... Call Trace: vhost_iotlb_add_range+0x11/0x800 [vhost_iotlb] vdpasim_map_range+0x91/0xd0 [vdpa_sim] vdpasim_alloc_coherent+0x56/0x90 [vdpa_sim] ... Esto sucede porque vdpasim-\u0026gt;iommu[0] no se inicializa cuando dev_attr.nas es 0. Solucionemos este problema inicializando ambos (nas, ngroups) en 1 para vdpa_sim_blk." } ], "id": "CVE-2022-50058", "lastModified": "2025-06-18T13:47:40.833", "metrics": {}, "published": "2025-06-18T11:15:34.497", "references": [ { "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/19cd4a5471b8eaa4bd161b0fdb4567f2fc88d809" }, { "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a291c7d289fac2cb13fb2614a9a251afbbd86ce9" } ], "sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", "vulnStatus": "Awaiting Analysis" }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…