fkie_cve-2022-50091
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2025-06-18 11:15
Modified
2025-06-18 13:47
Severity ?
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
locking/csd_lock: Change csdlock_debug from early_param to __setup
The csdlock_debug kernel-boot parameter is parsed by the
early_param() function csdlock_debug(). If set, csdlock_debug()
invokes static_branch_enable() to enable csd_lock_wait feature, which
triggers a panic on arm64 for kernels built with CONFIG_SPARSEMEM=y and
CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP=n.
With CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP=n, __nr_to_section is called in
static_key_enable() and returns NULL, resulting in a NULL dereference
because mem_section is initialized only later in sparse_init().
This is also a problem for powerpc because early_param() functions
are invoked earlier than jump_label_init(), also resulting in
static_key_enable() failures. These failures cause the warning "static
key 'xxx' used before call to jump_label_init()".
Thus, early_param is too early for csd_lock_wait to run
static_branch_enable(), so changes it to __setup to fix these.
References
Impacted products
Vendor | Product | Version |
---|
{ "cveTags": [], "descriptions": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nlocking/csd_lock: Change csdlock_debug from early_param to __setup\n\nThe csdlock_debug kernel-boot parameter is parsed by the\nearly_param() function csdlock_debug(). If set, csdlock_debug()\ninvokes static_branch_enable() to enable csd_lock_wait feature, which\ntriggers a panic on arm64 for kernels built with CONFIG_SPARSEMEM=y and\nCONFIG_SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP=n.\n\nWith CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP=n, __nr_to_section is called in\nstatic_key_enable() and returns NULL, resulting in a NULL dereference\nbecause mem_section is initialized only later in sparse_init().\n\nThis is also a problem for powerpc because early_param() functions\nare invoked earlier than jump_label_init(), also resulting in\nstatic_key_enable() failures. These failures cause the warning \"static\nkey \u0027xxx\u0027 used before call to jump_label_init()\".\n\nThus, early_param is too early for csd_lock_wait to run\nstatic_branch_enable(), so changes it to __setup to fix these." }, { "lang": "es", "value": "En el kernel de Linux, se ha resuelto la siguiente vulnerabilidad: locking/csd_lock: Cambiar csdlock_debug de early_param a __setup El par\u00e1metro csdlock_debug kernel-boot es analizado por la funci\u00f3n early_param() csdlock_debug(). Si se establece, csdlock_debug() invoca static_branch_enable() para habilitar la funci\u00f3n csd_lock_wait, que desencadena un p\u00e1nico en arm64 para kernels compilados con CONFIG_SPARSEMEM=y y CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP=n. Con CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP=n, se llama a __nr_to_section en static_key_enable() y devuelve NULL, lo que resulta en una desreferencia NULL porque mem_section se inicializa solo m\u00e1s tarde en sparse_init(). Esto tambi\u00e9n representa un problema para PowerPC, ya que las funciones early_param() se invocan antes que jump_label_init(), lo que tambi\u00e9n provoca fallos en static_key_enable(). Estos fallos generan la advertencia \"Clave est\u00e1tica \u0027xxx\u0027 usada antes de la llamada a jump_label_init()\". Por lo tanto, early_param es demasiado pronto para que csd_lock_wait ejecute static_branch_enable(), por lo que se cambia a __setup para solucionarlos." } ], "id": "CVE-2022-50091", "lastModified": "2025-06-18T13:47:40.833", "metrics": {}, "published": "2025-06-18T11:15:38.277", "references": [ { "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/05de9e2e33b1625c71aee69e353fe906dd2be88a" }, { "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/9c9b26b0df270d4f9246e483a44686fca951a29c" }, { "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b480d1e9a8c11ecc1c99dc01814b28e3103bd0a0" }, { "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d2cbdbe22b5f190055d2d0ae92e7454479343a30" } ], "sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", "vulnStatus": "Awaiting Analysis" }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…