fkie_cve-2022-50120
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2025-06-18 11:15
Modified
2025-06-18 13:47
Severity ?
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
remoteproc: imx_rproc: Fix refcount leak in imx_rproc_addr_init
of_parse_phandle() returns a node pointer with refcount
incremented, we should use of_node_put() on it when not needed anymore.
This function has two paths missing of_node_put().
References
Impacted products
Vendor | Product | Version |
---|
{ "cveTags": [], "descriptions": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nremoteproc: imx_rproc: Fix refcount leak in imx_rproc_addr_init\n\nof_parse_phandle() returns a node pointer with refcount\nincremented, we should use of_node_put() on it when not needed anymore.\nThis function has two paths missing of_node_put()." }, { "lang": "es", "value": "En el kernel de Linux, se ha resuelto la siguiente vulnerabilidad: remoteproc: imx_rproc: Se corrige la fuga de refcount en imx_rproc_addr_init. of_parse_phandle() devuelve un puntero de nodo con refcount incrementado; debemos usar of_node_put() cuando ya no sea necesario. Esta funci\u00f3n tiene dos rutas que faltan en of_node_put()." } ], "id": "CVE-2022-50120", "lastModified": "2025-06-18T13:47:40.833", "metrics": {}, "published": "2025-06-18T11:15:41.683", "references": [ { "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0dc1663e3fc22c72e1ab33be7701a0d51cca84ef" }, { "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/16da9f84e26f89e58cac194ff19fefd9de27d975" }, { "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/61afafe8b938bc74841cf4b1a73dd08b9d287c5a" }, { "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d8ac68927856c3a6d197a95be73c92ec0bd4b012" } ], "sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", "vulnStatus": "Awaiting Analysis" }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…