fkie_cve-2024-12084
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2025-01-15 15:15
Modified
2025-07-08 04:15
Severity ?
Summary
A heap-based buffer overflow flaw was found in the rsync daemon. This issue is due to improper handling of attacker-controlled checksum lengths (s2length) in the code. When MAX_DIGEST_LEN exceeds the fixed SUM_LENGTH (16 bytes), an attacker can write out of bounds in the sum2 buffer.
References
▶ | URL | Tags | |
---|---|---|---|
secalert@redhat.com | https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2025:6470 | ||
secalert@redhat.com | https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-12084 | Third Party Advisory | |
secalert@redhat.com | https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2330527 | Issue Tracking, Third Party Advisory | |
secalert@redhat.com | https://kb.cert.org/vuls/id/952657 | Third Party Advisory | |
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108 | http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2025/01/14/6 | Mailing List, Third Party Advisory | |
134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0 | https://github.com/google/security-research/security/advisories/GHSA-p5pg-x43v-mvqj | Exploit, Vendor Advisory |
Impacted products
Vendor | Product | Version | |
---|---|---|---|
samba | rsync | 3.2.7 | |
samba | rsync | 3.3.0 | |
almalinux | almalinux | 10.0 | |
archlinux | arch_linux | - | |
gentoo | linux | - | |
nixos | nixos | * | |
nixos | nixos | 24.11 | |
novell | suse_linux | - | |
tritondatacenter | smartos | * | |
redhat | enterprise_linux | 10.0 |
{ "configurations": [ { "nodes": [ { "cpeMatch": [ { "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:samba:rsync:3.2.7:-:*:*:*:*:*:*", "matchCriteriaId": "68EE0770-DDA7-4DF1-8605-48FF14BE3E94", "vulnerable": true }, { "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:samba:rsync:3.3.0:-:*:*:*:*:*:*", "matchCriteriaId": "F51AFAF2-4D1D-4827-942D-2004648B01FA", "vulnerable": true } ], "negate": false, "operator": "OR" } ] }, { "nodes": [ { "cpeMatch": [ { "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:almalinux:almalinux:10.0:-:*:*:*:*:*:*", "matchCriteriaId": "66FD02F3-C1C2-4E1D-98C1-8889004437D4", "vulnerable": true } ], "negate": false, "operator": "OR" } ] }, { "nodes": [ { "cpeMatch": [ { "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:archlinux:arch_linux:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "matchCriteriaId": "4824AE2D-462B-477D-9206-3E2090A32146", "vulnerable": true } ], "negate": false, "operator": "OR" } ] }, { "nodes": [ { "cpeMatch": [ { "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:gentoo:linux:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "matchCriteriaId": "92121D8A-529E-454A-BC8D-B6E0017E615D", "vulnerable": true } ], "negate": false, "operator": "OR" } ] }, { "nodes": [ { "cpeMatch": [ { "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:nixos:nixos:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "matchCriteriaId": "213883D5-9E62-4496-82E3-D5377995C257", "versionEndExcluding": "24.11", "vulnerable": true }, { "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:nixos:nixos:24.11:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "matchCriteriaId": "0645D7C7-C292-4C57-A8F9-D2F507A7C4D8", "vulnerable": true } ], "negate": false, "operator": "OR" } ] }, { "nodes": [ { "cpeMatch": [ { "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:novell:suse_linux:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "matchCriteriaId": "B627E2A9-DE93-43FB-BFB7-5B6F421554D5", "vulnerable": true } ], "negate": false, "operator": "OR" } ] }, { "nodes": [ { "cpeMatch": [ { "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:tritondatacenter:smartos:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "matchCriteriaId": "8EBD774C-F48F-45EC-A5DD-B1E56E54EF71", "versionEndExcluding": "20250123", "vulnerable": true } ], "negate": false, "operator": "OR" } ] }, { "nodes": [ { "cpeMatch": [ { "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:redhat:enterprise_linux:10.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "matchCriteriaId": "D65C2163-CFC2-4ABB-8F4E-CB09CEBD006C", "vulnerable": true } ], "negate": false, "operator": "OR" } ] } ], "cveTags": [], "descriptions": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "A heap-based buffer overflow flaw was found in the rsync daemon. This issue is due to improper handling of attacker-controlled checksum lengths (s2length) in the code. When MAX_DIGEST_LEN exceeds the fixed SUM_LENGTH (16 bytes), an attacker can write out of bounds in the sum2 buffer." }, { "lang": "es", "value": "Se encontr\u00f3 un fallo de desbordamiento de b\u00fafer basado en mont\u00f3n en rsync daemon. Este problema se debe a una gesti\u00f3n inadecuada de las longitudes de suma de comprobaci\u00f3n controladas por el atacante (s2length) en el c\u00f3digo. Cuando MAX_DIGEST_LEN excede el valor fijo SUM_LENGTH (16 bytes), un atacante puede escribir fuera de los l\u00edmites en el b\u00fafer de sum2." } ], "id": "CVE-2024-12084", "lastModified": "2025-07-08T04:15:35.820", "metrics": { "cvssMetricV31": [ { "cvssData": { "attackComplexity": "LOW", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "baseScore": 9.8, "baseSeverity": "CRITICAL", "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH", "integrityImpact": "HIGH", "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "userInteraction": "NONE", "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "version": "3.1" }, "exploitabilityScore": 3.9, "impactScore": 5.9, "source": "secalert@redhat.com", "type": "Secondary" } ] }, "published": "2025-01-15T15:15:10.537", "references": [ { "source": "secalert@redhat.com", "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2025:6470" }, { "source": "secalert@redhat.com", "tags": [ "Third Party Advisory" ], "url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-12084" }, { "source": "secalert@redhat.com", "tags": [ "Issue Tracking", "Third Party Advisory" ], "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2330527" }, { "source": "secalert@redhat.com", "tags": [ "Third Party Advisory" ], "url": "https://kb.cert.org/vuls/id/952657" }, { "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", "tags": [ "Mailing List", "Third Party Advisory" ], "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2025/01/14/6" }, { "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0", "tags": [ "Exploit", "Vendor Advisory" ], "url": "https://github.com/google/security-research/security/advisories/GHSA-p5pg-x43v-mvqj" } ], "sourceIdentifier": "secalert@redhat.com", "vulnStatus": "Modified", "weaknesses": [ { "description": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "CWE-122" } ], "source": "secalert@redhat.com", "type": "Secondary" }, { "description": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "CWE-787" } ], "source": "nvd@nist.gov", "type": "Primary" } ] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…