fkie_cve-2024-26868
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2024-04-17 11:15
Modified
2025-01-14 14:45
Severity ?
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
nfs: fix panic when nfs4_ff_layout_prepare_ds() fails
We've been seeing the following panic in production
BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000065
PGD 2f485f067 P4D 2f485f067 PUD 2cc5d8067 PMD 0
RIP: 0010:ff_layout_cancel_io+0x3a/0x90 [nfs_layout_flexfiles]
Call Trace:
<TASK>
? __die+0x78/0xc0
? page_fault_oops+0x286/0x380
? __rpc_execute+0x2c3/0x470 [sunrpc]
? rpc_new_task+0x42/0x1c0 [sunrpc]
? exc_page_fault+0x5d/0x110
? asm_exc_page_fault+0x22/0x30
? ff_layout_free_layoutreturn+0x110/0x110 [nfs_layout_flexfiles]
? ff_layout_cancel_io+0x3a/0x90 [nfs_layout_flexfiles]
? ff_layout_cancel_io+0x6f/0x90 [nfs_layout_flexfiles]
pnfs_mark_matching_lsegs_return+0x1b0/0x360 [nfsv4]
pnfs_error_mark_layout_for_return+0x9e/0x110 [nfsv4]
? ff_layout_send_layouterror+0x50/0x160 [nfs_layout_flexfiles]
nfs4_ff_layout_prepare_ds+0x11f/0x290 [nfs_layout_flexfiles]
ff_layout_pg_init_write+0xf0/0x1f0 [nfs_layout_flexfiles]
__nfs_pageio_add_request+0x154/0x6c0 [nfs]
nfs_pageio_add_request+0x26b/0x380 [nfs]
nfs_do_writepage+0x111/0x1e0 [nfs]
nfs_writepages_callback+0xf/0x30 [nfs]
write_cache_pages+0x17f/0x380
? nfs_pageio_init_write+0x50/0x50 [nfs]
? nfs_writepages+0x6d/0x210 [nfs]
? nfs_writepages+0x6d/0x210 [nfs]
nfs_writepages+0x125/0x210 [nfs]
do_writepages+0x67/0x220
? generic_perform_write+0x14b/0x210
filemap_fdatawrite_wbc+0x5b/0x80
file_write_and_wait_range+0x6d/0xc0
nfs_file_fsync+0x81/0x170 [nfs]
? nfs_file_mmap+0x60/0x60 [nfs]
__x64_sys_fsync+0x53/0x90
do_syscall_64+0x3d/0x90
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0xb0
Inspecting the core with drgn I was able to pull this
>>> prog.crashed_thread().stack_trace()[0]
#0 at 0xffffffffa079657a (ff_layout_cancel_io+0x3a/0x84) in ff_layout_cancel_io at fs/nfs/flexfilelayout/flexfilelayout.c:2021:27
>>> prog.crashed_thread().stack_trace()[0]['idx']
(u32)1
>>> prog.crashed_thread().stack_trace()[0]['flseg'].mirror_array[1].mirror_ds
(struct nfs4_ff_layout_ds *)0xffffffffffffffed
This is clear from the stack trace, we call nfs4_ff_layout_prepare_ds()
which could error out initializing the mirror_ds, and then we go to
clean it all up and our check is only for if (!mirror->mirror_ds). This
is inconsistent with the rest of the users of mirror_ds, which have
if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(mirror_ds))
to keep from tripping over this exact scenario. Fix this up in
ff_layout_cancel_io() to make sure we don't panic when we get an error.
I also spot checked all the other instances of checking mirror_ds and we
appear to be doing the correct checks everywhere, only unconditionally
dereferencing mirror_ds when we know it would be valid.
References
Impacted products
Vendor | Product | Version | |
---|---|---|---|
linux | linux_kernel | * | |
linux | linux_kernel | * | |
linux | linux_kernel | * | |
linux | linux_kernel | * |
{ "configurations": [ { "nodes": [ { "cpeMatch": [ { "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "matchCriteriaId": "3057E4AB-0FB4-49B3-B63D-10D187B96B1B", "versionEndExcluding": "6.1.83", "versionStartIncluding": "6.1", "vulnerable": true }, { "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "matchCriteriaId": "E00814DC-0BA7-431A-9926-80FEB4A96C68", "versionEndExcluding": "6.6.23", "versionStartIncluding": "6.2", "vulnerable": true }, { "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "matchCriteriaId": "9B95D3A6-E162-47D5-ABFC-F3FA74FA7CFD", "versionEndExcluding": "6.7.11", "versionStartIncluding": "6.7", "vulnerable": true }, { "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "matchCriteriaId": "543A75FF-25B8-4046-A514-1EA8EDD87AB1", "versionEndExcluding": "6.8.2", "versionStartIncluding": "6.8", "vulnerable": true } ], "negate": false, "operator": "OR" } ] } ], "cveTags": [], "descriptions": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnfs: fix panic when nfs4_ff_layout_prepare_ds() fails\n\nWe\u0027ve been seeing the following panic in production\n\nBUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000065\nPGD 2f485f067 P4D 2f485f067 PUD 2cc5d8067 PMD 0\nRIP: 0010:ff_layout_cancel_io+0x3a/0x90 [nfs_layout_flexfiles]\nCall Trace:\n \u003cTASK\u003e\n ? __die+0x78/0xc0\n ? page_fault_oops+0x286/0x380\n ? __rpc_execute+0x2c3/0x470 [sunrpc]\n ? rpc_new_task+0x42/0x1c0 [sunrpc]\n ? exc_page_fault+0x5d/0x110\n ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x22/0x30\n ? ff_layout_free_layoutreturn+0x110/0x110 [nfs_layout_flexfiles]\n ? ff_layout_cancel_io+0x3a/0x90 [nfs_layout_flexfiles]\n ? ff_layout_cancel_io+0x6f/0x90 [nfs_layout_flexfiles]\n pnfs_mark_matching_lsegs_return+0x1b0/0x360 [nfsv4]\n pnfs_error_mark_layout_for_return+0x9e/0x110 [nfsv4]\n ? ff_layout_send_layouterror+0x50/0x160 [nfs_layout_flexfiles]\n nfs4_ff_layout_prepare_ds+0x11f/0x290 [nfs_layout_flexfiles]\n ff_layout_pg_init_write+0xf0/0x1f0 [nfs_layout_flexfiles]\n __nfs_pageio_add_request+0x154/0x6c0 [nfs]\n nfs_pageio_add_request+0x26b/0x380 [nfs]\n nfs_do_writepage+0x111/0x1e0 [nfs]\n nfs_writepages_callback+0xf/0x30 [nfs]\n write_cache_pages+0x17f/0x380\n ? nfs_pageio_init_write+0x50/0x50 [nfs]\n ? nfs_writepages+0x6d/0x210 [nfs]\n ? nfs_writepages+0x6d/0x210 [nfs]\n nfs_writepages+0x125/0x210 [nfs]\n do_writepages+0x67/0x220\n ? generic_perform_write+0x14b/0x210\n filemap_fdatawrite_wbc+0x5b/0x80\n file_write_and_wait_range+0x6d/0xc0\n nfs_file_fsync+0x81/0x170 [nfs]\n ? nfs_file_mmap+0x60/0x60 [nfs]\n __x64_sys_fsync+0x53/0x90\n do_syscall_64+0x3d/0x90\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0xb0\n\nInspecting the core with drgn I was able to pull this\n\n \u003e\u003e\u003e prog.crashed_thread().stack_trace()[0]\n #0 at 0xffffffffa079657a (ff_layout_cancel_io+0x3a/0x84) in ff_layout_cancel_io at fs/nfs/flexfilelayout/flexfilelayout.c:2021:27\n \u003e\u003e\u003e prog.crashed_thread().stack_trace()[0][\u0027idx\u0027]\n (u32)1\n \u003e\u003e\u003e prog.crashed_thread().stack_trace()[0][\u0027flseg\u0027].mirror_array[1].mirror_ds\n (struct nfs4_ff_layout_ds *)0xffffffffffffffed\n\nThis is clear from the stack trace, we call nfs4_ff_layout_prepare_ds()\nwhich could error out initializing the mirror_ds, and then we go to\nclean it all up and our check is only for if (!mirror-\u003emirror_ds). This\nis inconsistent with the rest of the users of mirror_ds, which have\n\n if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(mirror_ds))\n\nto keep from tripping over this exact scenario. Fix this up in\nff_layout_cancel_io() to make sure we don\u0027t panic when we get an error.\nI also spot checked all the other instances of checking mirror_ds and we\nappear to be doing the correct checks everywhere, only unconditionally\ndereferencing mirror_ds when we know it would be valid." }, { "lang": "es", "value": "En el kernel de Linux, se ha resuelto la siguiente vulnerabilidad: nfs: soluciona el p\u00e1nico cuando falla nfs4_ff_layout_prepare_ds() Hemos estado viendo el siguiente error de p\u00e1nico en producci\u00f3n: desreferencia del puntero NULL del kernel, direcci\u00f3n: 0000000000000065 PGD 2f485f067 P4D 2f485f067 PUD 2cc5d8067 PMD RIP : 0010:ff_layout_cancel_io+0x3a/0x90 [nfs_layout_flexfiles] Seguimiento de llamadas: ? __die+0x78/0xc0 ? page_fault_oops+0x286/0x380? __rpc_execute+0x2c3/0x470 [sunrpc] ? rpc_new_task+0x42/0x1c0 [sunrpc] ? exc_page_fault+0x5d/0x110? asm_exc_page_fault+0x22/0x30? ff_layout_free_layoutreturn+0x110/0x110 [nfs_layout_flexfiles]? ff_layout_cancel_io+0x3a/0x90 [nfs_layout_flexfiles]? ff_layout_cancel_io+0x6f/0x90 [nfs_layout_flexfiles] pnfs_mark_matching_lsegs_return+0x1b0/0x360 [nfsv4] pnfs_error_mark_layout_for_return+0x9e/0x110 [nfsv4] ? ff_layout_send_layouterror+0x50/0x160 [nfs_layout_flexfiles] nfs4_ff_layout_prepare_ds+0x11f/0x290 [nfs_layout_flexfiles] ff_layout_pg_init_write+0xf0/0x1f0 [nfs_layout_flexfiles] __nfs_pageio_add_re b\u00fasqueda+0x154/0x6c0 [nfs] nfs_pageio_add_request+0x26b/0x380 [nfs] nfs_do_writepage+0x111/0x1e0 [nfs] nfs_writepages_callback+ 0xf/0x30 [nfs] write_cache_pages+0x17f/0x380 ? nfs_pageio_init_write+0x50/0x50 [nfs] ? nfs_writepages+0x6d/0x210 [nfs]? nfs_writepages+0x6d/0x210 [nfs] nfs_writepages+0x125/0x210 [nfs] do_writepages+0x67/0x220? generic_perform_write+0x14b/0x210 filemap_fdatawrite_wbc+0x5b/0x80 file_write_and_wait_range+0x6d/0xc0 nfs_file_fsync+0x81/0x170 [nfs] ? nfs_file_mmap+0x60/0x60 [nfs] __x64_sys_fsync+0x53/0x90 do_syscall_64+0x3d/0x90 Entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0xb0 Inspeccionando el n\u00facleo con drgn pude extraer esto \u0026gt;\u0026gt;\u0026gt; prog.crashed_thread().stack_trace()[0 ] # 0 en 0xffffffffa079657a (ff_layout_cancel_io+0x3a/0x84) en ff_layout_cancel_io en fs/nfs/flexfilelayout/flexfilelayout.c:2021:27 \u0026gt;\u0026gt;\u0026gt; prog.crashed_thread().stack_trace()[0][\u0027idx\u0027] (u32)1 \u0026gt;\u0026gt;\u0026gt; prog.crashed_thread().stack_trace()[0][\u0027flseg\u0027].mirror_array[1].mirror_ds (struct nfs4_ff_layout_ds *)0xffffffffffffffed Esto queda claro en el seguimiento de la pila, llamamos a nfs4_ff_layout_prepare_ds(), lo que podr\u00eda generar un error inicializando mirror_ds, y luego vamos a limpiarlo todo y nuestra verificaci\u00f3n es solo para if (!mirror-\u0026gt;mirror_ds). Esto es inconsistente con el resto de usuarios de mirror_ds, que tienen if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(mirror_ds)) para evitar tropezar con este escenario exacto. Solucione esto en ff_layout_cancel_io() para asegurarnos de que no entremos en p\u00e1nico cuando recibamos un error. Tambi\u00e9n revis\u00e9 todas las dem\u00e1s instancias de verificaci\u00f3n de mirror_ds y parece que estamos haciendo las verificaciones correctas en todas partes, solo desreferenciando incondicionalmente mirror_ds cuando sabemos que ser\u00eda v\u00e1lido." } ], "id": "CVE-2024-26868", "lastModified": "2025-01-14T14:45:52.020", "metrics": { "cvssMetricV31": [ { "cvssData": { "attackComplexity": "LOW", "attackVector": "LOCAL", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "baseScore": 5.5, "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM", "confidentialityImpact": "NONE", "integrityImpact": "NONE", "privilegesRequired": "LOW", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "userInteraction": "NONE", "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H", "version": "3.1" }, "exploitabilityScore": 1.8, "impactScore": 3.6, "source": "nvd@nist.gov", "type": "Primary" } ] }, "published": "2024-04-17T11:15:09.360", "references": [ { "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", "tags": [ "Patch" ], "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/31db25e3141b20e2a76a9f219eeca52e3cab126c" }, { "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", "tags": [ "Patch" ], "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5ada9016b1217498fad876a3d5b07645cc955608" }, { "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", "tags": [ "Patch" ], "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/719fcafe07c12646691bd62d7f8d94d657fa0766" }, { "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", "tags": [ "Patch" ], "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7ca651b4ec4a049f5a46a0e5ff921b86b91c47c5" }, { "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", "tags": [ "Patch" ], "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/dac068f164ad05b35e7c0be13f138c3f6adca58f" }, { "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", "tags": [ "Patch" ], "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/31db25e3141b20e2a76a9f219eeca52e3cab126c" }, { "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", "tags": [ "Patch" ], "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5ada9016b1217498fad876a3d5b07645cc955608" }, { "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", "tags": [ "Patch" ], "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/719fcafe07c12646691bd62d7f8d94d657fa0766" }, { "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", "tags": [ "Patch" ], "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7ca651b4ec4a049f5a46a0e5ff921b86b91c47c5" }, { "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", "tags": [ "Patch" ], "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/dac068f164ad05b35e7c0be13f138c3f6adca58f" } ], "sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", "vulnStatus": "Analyzed", "weaknesses": [ { "description": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "CWE-476" } ], "source": "nvd@nist.gov", "type": "Primary" } ] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…