fkie_cve-2024-32638
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2024-05-02 10:15
Modified
2025-07-10 16:00
Severity ?
Summary
Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests ('HTTP Request Smuggling') vulnerability in Apache APISIX when using `forward-auth` plugin.This issue affects Apache APISIX: from 3.8.0, 3.9.0.
Users are recommended to upgrade to version 3.8.1, 3.9.1 or higher, which fixes the issue.
References
▶ | URL | Tags | |
---|---|---|---|
security@apache.org | http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/05/02/2 | Mailing List, Third Party Advisory | |
security@apache.org | https://lists.apache.org/thread/ngvgxllw4zn4hgngkqw2o225kf9wotov | Mailing List, Vendor Advisory | |
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108 | http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/05/02/2 | Mailing List, Third Party Advisory | |
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108 | https://lists.apache.org/thread/ngvgxllw4zn4hgngkqw2o225kf9wotov | Mailing List, Vendor Advisory |
{ "configurations": [ { "nodes": [ { "cpeMatch": [ { "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:apache:apisix:3.8.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "matchCriteriaId": "673953A0-7C5B-460B-9F28-CBD492B537F0", "vulnerable": true }, { "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:apache:apisix:3.9.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "matchCriteriaId": "79192958-40FE-429C-B251-8A0F71CFEDBB", "vulnerable": true } ], "negate": false, "operator": "OR" } ] } ], "cveTags": [], "descriptions": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests (\u0027HTTP Request Smuggling\u0027)\u00a0vulnerability in Apache APISIX when using `forward-auth` plugin.This issue affects Apache APISIX: from 3.8.0, 3.9.0.\n\nUsers are recommended to upgrade to version 3.8.1, 3.9.1 or higher, which fixes the issue." }, { "lang": "es", "value": "Vulnerabilidad de interpretaci\u00f3n inconsistente de solicitudes HTTP (\"contrabando de solicitudes HTTP\") en Apache APISIX cuando se utiliza el complemento `forward-auth`. Este problema afecta a Apache APISIX: desde 3.8.0, 3.9.0. Se recomienda a los usuarios actualizar a la versi\u00f3n 3.8.1, 3.9.1 o superior, lo que soluciona el problema." } ], "id": "CVE-2024-32638", "lastModified": "2025-07-10T16:00:20.313", "metrics": { "cvssMetricV31": [ { "cvssData": { "attackComplexity": "LOW", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "availabilityImpact": "LOW", "baseScore": 6.3, "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM", "confidentialityImpact": "LOW", "integrityImpact": "LOW", "privilegesRequired": "LOW", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "userInteraction": "NONE", "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L", "version": "3.1" }, "exploitabilityScore": 2.8, "impactScore": 3.4, "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0", "type": "Secondary" } ] }, "published": "2024-05-02T10:15:08.443", "references": [ { "source": "security@apache.org", "tags": [ "Mailing List", "Third Party Advisory" ], "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/05/02/2" }, { "source": "security@apache.org", "tags": [ "Mailing List", "Vendor Advisory" ], "url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread/ngvgxllw4zn4hgngkqw2o225kf9wotov" }, { "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", "tags": [ "Mailing List", "Third Party Advisory" ], "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/05/02/2" }, { "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", "tags": [ "Mailing List", "Vendor Advisory" ], "url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread/ngvgxllw4zn4hgngkqw2o225kf9wotov" } ], "sourceIdentifier": "security@apache.org", "vulnStatus": "Analyzed", "weaknesses": [ { "description": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "CWE-444" } ], "source": "security@apache.org", "type": "Secondary" }, { "description": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "CWE-444" } ], "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0", "type": "Secondary" } ] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…