fkie_cve-2024-39510
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2024-07-12 13:15
Modified
2024-11-21 09:27
Severity ?
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
cachefiles: fix slab-use-after-free in cachefiles_ondemand_daemon_read()
We got the following issue in a fuzz test of randomly issuing the restore
command:
==================================================================
BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in cachefiles_ondemand_daemon_read+0xb41/0xb60
Read of size 8 at addr ffff888122e84088 by task ondemand-04-dae/963
CPU: 13 PID: 963 Comm: ondemand-04-dae Not tainted 6.8.0-dirty #564
Call Trace:
kasan_report+0x93/0xc0
cachefiles_ondemand_daemon_read+0xb41/0xb60
vfs_read+0x169/0xb50
ksys_read+0xf5/0x1e0
Allocated by task 116:
kmem_cache_alloc+0x140/0x3a0
cachefiles_lookup_cookie+0x140/0xcd0
fscache_cookie_state_machine+0x43c/0x1230
[...]
Freed by task 792:
kmem_cache_free+0xfe/0x390
cachefiles_put_object+0x241/0x480
fscache_cookie_state_machine+0x5c8/0x1230
[...]
==================================================================
Following is the process that triggers the issue:
mount | daemon_thread1 | daemon_thread2
------------------------------------------------------------
cachefiles_withdraw_cookie
cachefiles_ondemand_clean_object(object)
cachefiles_ondemand_send_req
REQ_A = kzalloc(sizeof(*req) + data_len)
wait_for_completion(&REQ_A->done)
cachefiles_daemon_read
cachefiles_ondemand_daemon_read
REQ_A = cachefiles_ondemand_select_req
msg->object_id = req->object->ondemand->ondemand_id
------ restore ------
cachefiles_ondemand_restore
xas_for_each(&xas, req, ULONG_MAX)
xas_set_mark(&xas, CACHEFILES_REQ_NEW)
cachefiles_daemon_read
cachefiles_ondemand_daemon_read
REQ_A = cachefiles_ondemand_select_req
copy_to_user(_buffer, msg, n)
xa_erase(&cache->reqs, id)
complete(&REQ_A->done)
------ close(fd) ------
cachefiles_ondemand_fd_release
cachefiles_put_object
cachefiles_put_object
kmem_cache_free(cachefiles_object_jar, object)
REQ_A->object->ondemand->ondemand_id
// object UAF !!!
When we see the request within xa_lock, req->object must not have been
freed yet, so grab the reference count of object before xa_unlock to
avoid the above issue.
References
Impacted products
Vendor | Product | Version | |
---|---|---|---|
linux | linux_kernel | * | |
linux | linux_kernel | 6.10 | |
linux | linux_kernel | 6.10 | |
linux | linux_kernel | 6.10 |
{ "configurations": [ { "nodes": [ { "cpeMatch": [ { "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "matchCriteriaId": "5A16B675-D12F-49F9-AB96-23E6074FF336", "versionEndExcluding": "6.9.6", "versionStartIncluding": "6.8", "vulnerable": true }, { "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.10:rc1:*:*:*:*:*:*", "matchCriteriaId": "2EBB4392-5FA6-4DA9-9772-8F9C750109FA", "vulnerable": true }, { "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.10:rc2:*:*:*:*:*:*", "matchCriteriaId": "331C2F14-12C7-45D5-893D-8C52EE38EA10", "vulnerable": true }, { "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.10:rc3:*:*:*:*:*:*", "matchCriteriaId": "3173713D-909A-4DD3-9DD4-1E171EB057EE", "vulnerable": true } ], "negate": false, "operator": "OR" } ] } ], "cveTags": [], "descriptions": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\ncachefiles: fix slab-use-after-free in cachefiles_ondemand_daemon_read()\n\nWe got the following issue in a fuzz test of randomly issuing the restore\ncommand:\n\n==================================================================\nBUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in cachefiles_ondemand_daemon_read+0xb41/0xb60\nRead of size 8 at addr ffff888122e84088 by task ondemand-04-dae/963\n\nCPU: 13 PID: 963 Comm: ondemand-04-dae Not tainted 6.8.0-dirty #564\nCall Trace:\n kasan_report+0x93/0xc0\n cachefiles_ondemand_daemon_read+0xb41/0xb60\n vfs_read+0x169/0xb50\n ksys_read+0xf5/0x1e0\n\nAllocated by task 116:\n kmem_cache_alloc+0x140/0x3a0\n cachefiles_lookup_cookie+0x140/0xcd0\n fscache_cookie_state_machine+0x43c/0x1230\n [...]\n\nFreed by task 792:\n kmem_cache_free+0xfe/0x390\n cachefiles_put_object+0x241/0x480\n fscache_cookie_state_machine+0x5c8/0x1230\n [...]\n==================================================================\n\nFollowing is the process that triggers the issue:\n\n mount | daemon_thread1 | daemon_thread2\n------------------------------------------------------------\ncachefiles_withdraw_cookie\n cachefiles_ondemand_clean_object(object)\n cachefiles_ondemand_send_req\n REQ_A = kzalloc(sizeof(*req) + data_len)\n wait_for_completion(\u0026REQ_A-\u003edone)\n\n cachefiles_daemon_read\n cachefiles_ondemand_daemon_read\n REQ_A = cachefiles_ondemand_select_req\n msg-\u003eobject_id = req-\u003eobject-\u003eondemand-\u003eondemand_id\n ------ restore ------\n cachefiles_ondemand_restore\n xas_for_each(\u0026xas, req, ULONG_MAX)\n xas_set_mark(\u0026xas, CACHEFILES_REQ_NEW)\n\n cachefiles_daemon_read\n cachefiles_ondemand_daemon_read\n REQ_A = cachefiles_ondemand_select_req\n copy_to_user(_buffer, msg, n)\n xa_erase(\u0026cache-\u003ereqs, id)\n complete(\u0026REQ_A-\u003edone)\n ------ close(fd) ------\n cachefiles_ondemand_fd_release\n cachefiles_put_object\n cachefiles_put_object\n kmem_cache_free(cachefiles_object_jar, object)\n REQ_A-\u003eobject-\u003eondemand-\u003eondemand_id\n // object UAF !!!\n\nWhen we see the request within xa_lock, req-\u003eobject must not have been\nfreed yet, so grab the reference count of object before xa_unlock to\navoid the above issue." }, { "lang": "es", "value": "En el kernel de Linux, se resolvi\u00f3 la siguiente vulnerabilidad: cachefiles: fix slab-use-after-free in cachefiles_ondemand_daemon_read() Obtuvimos el siguiente problema en una prueba de ejecuci\u00f3n aleatoria del comando de restauraci\u00f3n: ======== ==================================================== ======== ERROR: KASAN: slab-use-after-free en cachefiles_ondemand_daemon_read+0xb41/0xb60 Lectura de tama\u00f1o 8 en la direcci\u00f3n ffff888122e84088 por tarea ondemand-04-dae/963 CPU: 13 PID: 963 Comm: ondemand -04-dae Not tainted 6.8.0-dirty #564 Seguimiento de llamadas: kasan_report+0x93/0xc0 cachefiles_ondemand_daemon_read+0xb41/0xb60 vfs_read+0x169/0xb50 ksys_read+0xf5/0x1e0 Asignado por tarea 116: kmem_cache_alloc+0x14 0/0x3a0 cachefiles_lookup_cookie+0x140/ 0xcd0 fscache_cookie_state_machine+0x43c/0x1230 [...] Liberado por la tarea 792: kmem_cache_free+0xfe/0x390 cachefiles_put_object+0x241/0x480 fscache_cookie_state_machine+0x5c8/0x1230 [...] =============== ==================================================== == El siguiente es el proceso que desencadena el problema: montar | daemon_thread1 | daemon_thread2 ------------------------------------------------- ----------- cachefiles_withdraw_cookie cachefiles_ondemand_clean_object(object) cachefiles_ondemand_send_req REQ_A = kzalloc(sizeof(*req) + data_len) wait_for_completion(\u0026amp;REQ_A-\u0026gt;done) cachefiles_daemon_read cachefiles_ondemand_daemon_read REQ_A = cachefiles_ondemand_select_req- \u0026gt;object_id = solicitud-\u0026gt;objeto -\u0026gt;ondemand-\u0026gt;ondemand_id ------ restaurar ------ cachefiles_ondemand_restore xas_for_each(\u0026amp;xas, req, ULONG_MAX) xas_set_mark(\u0026amp;xas, CACHEFILES_REQ_NEW) cachefiles_daemon_read cachefiles_ondemand_daemon_read REQ_A = cachefiles_ondemand_select_req er, mensaje, n) xa_erase(\u0026amp;cache -\u0026gt;reqs, id) complete(\u0026amp;REQ_A-\u0026gt;done) ------ close(fd) ------ cachefiles_ondemand_fd_release cachefiles_put_object cachefiles_put_object kmem_cache_free(cachefiles_object_jar, object) REQ_A-\u0026gt;object-\u0026gt;ondemand-\u0026gt;ondemand_id // objeto UAF !!! Cuando vemos la solicitud dentro de xa_lock, req-\u0026gt;object no debe haberse liberado a\u00fan, as\u00ed que tome el recuento de referencia del objeto antes de xa_unlock para evitar el problema anterior." } ], "id": "CVE-2024-39510", "lastModified": "2024-11-21T09:27:52.917", "metrics": { "cvssMetricV31": [ { "cvssData": { "attackComplexity": "LOW", "attackVector": "LOCAL", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "baseScore": 7.8, "baseSeverity": "HIGH", "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH", "integrityImpact": "HIGH", "privilegesRequired": "LOW", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "userInteraction": "NONE", "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "version": "3.1" }, "exploitabilityScore": 1.8, "impactScore": 5.9, "source": "nvd@nist.gov", "type": "Primary" } ] }, "published": "2024-07-12T13:15:13.283", "references": [ { "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", "tags": [ "Patch" ], "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3958679c49152391209b32be3357193300a51abd" }, { "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", "tags": [ "Patch" ], "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/93064676a2820420a2d37d7c8289f277fe20793d" }, { "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", "tags": [ "Patch" ], "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/cb55625f8eb9d2de8be4da0c4580d48cbb32058e" }, { "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", "tags": [ "Patch" ], "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/da4a827416066191aafeeccee50a8836a826ba10" }, { "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", "tags": [ "Patch" ], "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3958679c49152391209b32be3357193300a51abd" }, { "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", "tags": [ "Patch" ], "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/93064676a2820420a2d37d7c8289f277fe20793d" }, { "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", "tags": [ "Patch" ], "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/cb55625f8eb9d2de8be4da0c4580d48cbb32058e" }, { "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", "tags": [ "Patch" ], "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/da4a827416066191aafeeccee50a8836a826ba10" } ], "sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", "vulnStatus": "Modified", "weaknesses": [ { "description": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "CWE-416" } ], "source": "nvd@nist.gov", "type": "Primary" } ] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…