fkie_cve-2024-42835
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2024-10-31 14:15
Modified
2025-05-27 20:34
Severity ?
Summary
langflow v1.0.12 was discovered to contain a remote code execution (RCE) vulnerability via the PythonCodeTool component.
References
▶ | URL | Tags | |
---|---|---|---|
cve@mitre.org | https://github.com/langflow-ai/langflow/issues/2908 | Exploit, Issue Tracking, Vendor Advisory |
{ "configurations": [ { "nodes": [ { "cpeMatch": [ { "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:langflow:langflow:1.0.12:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "matchCriteriaId": "135A6064-944D-4F70-890C-8F606315B1E6", "vulnerable": true } ], "negate": false, "operator": "OR" } ] } ], "cveTags": [], "descriptions": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "langflow v1.0.12 was discovered to contain a remote code execution (RCE) vulnerability via the PythonCodeTool component." }, { "lang": "es", "value": " Se descubri\u00f3 que langflow v1.0.12 conten\u00eda una vulnerabilidad de ejecuci\u00f3n remota de c\u00f3digo (RCE) a trav\u00e9s del componente PythonCodeTool." } ], "id": "CVE-2024-42835", "lastModified": "2025-05-27T20:34:39.113", "metrics": { "cvssMetricV31": [ { "cvssData": { "attackComplexity": "LOW", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "baseScore": 9.8, "baseSeverity": "CRITICAL", "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH", "integrityImpact": "HIGH", "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "userInteraction": "NONE", "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "version": "3.1" }, "exploitabilityScore": 3.9, "impactScore": 5.9, "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0", "type": "Secondary" } ] }, "published": "2024-10-31T14:15:05.610", "references": [ { "source": "cve@mitre.org", "tags": [ "Exploit", "Issue Tracking", "Vendor Advisory" ], "url": "https://github.com/langflow-ai/langflow/issues/2908" } ], "sourceIdentifier": "cve@mitre.org", "vulnStatus": "Analyzed", "weaknesses": [ { "description": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "NVD-CWE-noinfo" } ], "source": "nvd@nist.gov", "type": "Primary" } ] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…