fkie_cve-2024-46678
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2024-09-13 06:15
Modified
2024-09-23 14:44
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bonding: change ipsec_lock from spin lock to mutex In the cited commit, bond->ipsec_lock is added to protect ipsec_list, hence xdo_dev_state_add and xdo_dev_state_delete are called inside this lock. As ipsec_lock is a spin lock and such xfrmdev ops may sleep, "scheduling while atomic" will be triggered when changing bond's active slave. [ 101.055189] BUG: scheduling while atomic: bash/902/0x00000200 [ 101.055726] Modules linked in: [ 101.058211] CPU: 3 PID: 902 Comm: bash Not tainted 6.9.0-rc4+ #1 [ 101.058760] Hardware name: [ 101.059434] Call Trace: [ 101.059436] <TASK> [ 101.060873] dump_stack_lvl+0x51/0x60 [ 101.061275] __schedule_bug+0x4e/0x60 [ 101.061682] __schedule+0x612/0x7c0 [ 101.062078] ? __mod_timer+0x25c/0x370 [ 101.062486] schedule+0x25/0xd0 [ 101.062845] schedule_timeout+0x77/0xf0 [ 101.063265] ? asm_common_interrupt+0x22/0x40 [ 101.063724] ? __bpf_trace_itimer_state+0x10/0x10 [ 101.064215] __wait_for_common+0x87/0x190 [ 101.064648] ? usleep_range_state+0x90/0x90 [ 101.065091] cmd_exec+0x437/0xb20 [mlx5_core] [ 101.065569] mlx5_cmd_do+0x1e/0x40 [mlx5_core] [ 101.066051] mlx5_cmd_exec+0x18/0x30 [mlx5_core] [ 101.066552] mlx5_crypto_create_dek_key+0xea/0x120 [mlx5_core] [ 101.067163] ? bonding_sysfs_store_option+0x4d/0x80 [bonding] [ 101.067738] ? kmalloc_trace+0x4d/0x350 [ 101.068156] mlx5_ipsec_create_sa_ctx+0x33/0x100 [mlx5_core] [ 101.068747] mlx5e_xfrm_add_state+0x47b/0xaa0 [mlx5_core] [ 101.069312] bond_change_active_slave+0x392/0x900 [bonding] [ 101.069868] bond_option_active_slave_set+0x1c2/0x240 [bonding] [ 101.070454] __bond_opt_set+0xa6/0x430 [bonding] [ 101.070935] __bond_opt_set_notify+0x2f/0x90 [bonding] [ 101.071453] bond_opt_tryset_rtnl+0x72/0xb0 [bonding] [ 101.071965] bonding_sysfs_store_option+0x4d/0x80 [bonding] [ 101.072567] kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x10c/0x1a0 [ 101.073033] vfs_write+0x2d8/0x400 [ 101.073416] ? alloc_fd+0x48/0x180 [ 101.073798] ksys_write+0x5f/0xe0 [ 101.074175] do_syscall_64+0x52/0x110 [ 101.074576] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53 As bond_ipsec_add_sa_all and bond_ipsec_del_sa_all are only called from bond_change_active_slave, which requires holding the RTNL lock. And bond_ipsec_add_sa and bond_ipsec_del_sa are xfrm state xdo_dev_state_add and xdo_dev_state_delete APIs, which are in user context. So ipsec_lock doesn't have to be spin lock, change it to mutex, and thus the above issue can be resolved.



{
  "configurations": [
    {
      "nodes": [
        {
          "cpeMatch": [
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "E8C8B6A6-E5EE-4163-A155-8D5BFD1BBC4A",
              "versionEndExcluding": "5.11",
              "versionStartIncluding": "5.10.54",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "3FCF5994-AD9A-4278-8BF1-BC9274834795",
              "versionEndExcluding": "5.14",
              "versionStartIncluding": "5.13.6",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "03EC2AFC-5CDB-45F4-A071-83D36CE1569B",
              "versionEndExcluding": "6.6.49",
              "versionStartIncluding": "5.14",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "1B5D46C3-56A4-4380-9309-27BF73DF29A7",
              "versionEndExcluding": "6.10.8",
              "versionStartIncluding": "6.7",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.11:rc1:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "8B3CE743-2126-47A3-8B7C-822B502CF119",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.11:rc2:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "4DEB27E7-30AA-45CC-8934-B89263EF3551",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.11:rc3:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "E0005AEF-856E-47EB-BFE4-90C46899394D",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.11:rc4:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "39889A68-6D34-47A6-82FC-CD0BF23D6754",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.11:rc5:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "B8383ABF-1457-401F-9B61-EE50F4C61F4F",
              "vulnerable": true
            }
          ],
          "negate": false,
          "operator": "OR"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nbonding: change ipsec_lock from spin lock to mutex\n\nIn the cited commit, bond-\u003eipsec_lock is added to protect ipsec_list,\nhence xdo_dev_state_add and xdo_dev_state_delete are called inside\nthis lock. As ipsec_lock is a spin lock and such xfrmdev ops may sleep,\n\"scheduling while atomic\" will be triggered when changing bond\u0027s\nactive slave.\n\n[  101.055189] BUG: scheduling while atomic: bash/902/0x00000200\n[  101.055726] Modules linked in:\n[  101.058211] CPU: 3 PID: 902 Comm: bash Not tainted 6.9.0-rc4+ #1\n[  101.058760] Hardware name:\n[  101.059434] Call Trace:\n[  101.059436]  \u003cTASK\u003e\n[  101.060873]  dump_stack_lvl+0x51/0x60\n[  101.061275]  __schedule_bug+0x4e/0x60\n[  101.061682]  __schedule+0x612/0x7c0\n[  101.062078]  ? __mod_timer+0x25c/0x370\n[  101.062486]  schedule+0x25/0xd0\n[  101.062845]  schedule_timeout+0x77/0xf0\n[  101.063265]  ? asm_common_interrupt+0x22/0x40\n[  101.063724]  ? __bpf_trace_itimer_state+0x10/0x10\n[  101.064215]  __wait_for_common+0x87/0x190\n[  101.064648]  ? usleep_range_state+0x90/0x90\n[  101.065091]  cmd_exec+0x437/0xb20 [mlx5_core]\n[  101.065569]  mlx5_cmd_do+0x1e/0x40 [mlx5_core]\n[  101.066051]  mlx5_cmd_exec+0x18/0x30 [mlx5_core]\n[  101.066552]  mlx5_crypto_create_dek_key+0xea/0x120 [mlx5_core]\n[  101.067163]  ? bonding_sysfs_store_option+0x4d/0x80 [bonding]\n[  101.067738]  ? kmalloc_trace+0x4d/0x350\n[  101.068156]  mlx5_ipsec_create_sa_ctx+0x33/0x100 [mlx5_core]\n[  101.068747]  mlx5e_xfrm_add_state+0x47b/0xaa0 [mlx5_core]\n[  101.069312]  bond_change_active_slave+0x392/0x900 [bonding]\n[  101.069868]  bond_option_active_slave_set+0x1c2/0x240 [bonding]\n[  101.070454]  __bond_opt_set+0xa6/0x430 [bonding]\n[  101.070935]  __bond_opt_set_notify+0x2f/0x90 [bonding]\n[  101.071453]  bond_opt_tryset_rtnl+0x72/0xb0 [bonding]\n[  101.071965]  bonding_sysfs_store_option+0x4d/0x80 [bonding]\n[  101.072567]  kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x10c/0x1a0\n[  101.073033]  vfs_write+0x2d8/0x400\n[  101.073416]  ? alloc_fd+0x48/0x180\n[  101.073798]  ksys_write+0x5f/0xe0\n[  101.074175]  do_syscall_64+0x52/0x110\n[  101.074576]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53\n\nAs bond_ipsec_add_sa_all and bond_ipsec_del_sa_all are only called\nfrom bond_change_active_slave, which requires holding the RTNL lock.\nAnd bond_ipsec_add_sa and bond_ipsec_del_sa are xfrm state\nxdo_dev_state_add and xdo_dev_state_delete APIs, which are in user\ncontext. So ipsec_lock doesn\u0027t have to be spin lock, change it to\nmutex, and thus the above issue can be resolved."
    },
    {
      "lang": "es",
      "value": "En el kernel de Linux, se ha resuelto la siguiente vulnerabilidad: bonding: cambiar ipsec_lock de spin lock a mutex en el commit citado, se agrega bond-\u0026gt;ipsec_lock para proteger ipsec_list, por lo tanto, se llaman xdo_dev_state_add y xdo_dev_state_delete dentro de este bloqueo. Como ipsec_lock es un spin lock y tales operaciones xfrmdev pueden dormir, se activar\u00e1 \"programaci\u00f3n mientras es at\u00f3mica\" al cambiar el esclavo activo de bond. [ 101.055189] ERROR: programaci\u00f3n mientras es at\u00f3mica: bash/902/0x00000200 [ 101.055726] M\u00f3dulos vinculados en: [ 101.058211] CPU: 3 PID: 902 Comm: bash No contaminado 6.9.0-rc4+ #1 [ 101.058760] Nombre del hardware: [ 101.059434] Seguimiento de llamadas: [ 101.059436]  [ 101.060873] dump_stack_lvl+0x51/0x60 [ 101.061275] __schedule_bug+0x4e/0x60 [ 101.061682] __schedule+0x612/0x7c0 [ 101.062078] ? __mod_timer+0x25c/0x370 [ 101.062486] schedule+0x25/0xd0 [ 101.062845] schedule_timeout+0x77/0xf0 [ 101.063265] ? asm_common_interrupt+0x22/0x40 [ 101.063724] ? __bpf_trace_itimer_state+0x10/0x10 [ 101.064215] __wait_for_common+0x87/0x190 [ 101.064648] ? opci\u00f3n_almacenamiento_sysfs_bonding+0x4d/0x80 [bonding] [ 101.067738] ? kmalloc_trace+0x4d/0x350 [ 101.068156] mlx5_ipsec_create_sa_ctx+0x33/0x100 [mlx5_core] [ 101.068747] mlx5e_xfrm_add_state+0x47b/0xaa0 [mlx5_core] [ 101.069312] cambio_enlace_esclavo_activo+0x392/0x900 [enlace] [ 101.069868] opci\u00f3n_enlace_esclavo_activo_conjunto+0x1c2/0x240 [enlace] [ 101.070454] __opci\u00f3n_enlace_conjunto+0xa6/0x430 [enlace] [ 101.070935] __bond_opt_set_notify+0x2f/0x90 [vinculaci\u00f3n] [ 101.071453] bond_opt_tryset_rtnl+0x72/0xb0 [vinculaci\u00f3n] [ 101.071965] bonding_sysfs_store_option+0x4d/0x80 [vinculaci\u00f3n] [ 101.072567] kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x10c/0x1a0 [ 101.073033] vfs_write+0x2d8/0x400 [ 101.073416] ? alloc_fd+0x48/0x180 [ 101.073798] ksys_write+0x5f/0xe0 [ 101.074175] do_syscall_64+0x52/0x110 [ 101.074576] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53 Como bond_ipsec_add_sa_all y bond_ipsec_del_sa_all solo se llaman desde bond_change_active_slave, que requiere mantener el bloqueo RTNL. Y bond_ipsec_add_sa y bond_ipsec_del_sa son API xdo_dev_state_add y xdo_dev_state_delete de estado xfrm, que est\u00e1n en el contexto del usuario. Por lo tanto, ipsec_lock no tiene que ser un bloqueo de giro; c\u00e1mbielo a mutex y, por lo tanto, se puede resolver el problema anterior."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2024-46678",
  "lastModified": "2024-09-23T14:44:12.880",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV31": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "LOW",
          "attackVector": "LOCAL",
          "availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
          "baseScore": 5.5,
          "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
          "confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
          "integrityImpact": "NONE",
          "privilegesRequired": "LOW",
          "scope": "UNCHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "NONE",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 1.8,
        "impactScore": 3.6,
        "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
        "type": "Primary"
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2024-09-13T06:15:12.450",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
      "tags": [
        "Patch"
      ],
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2aeeef906d5a526dc60cf4af92eda69836c39b1f"
    },
    {
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
      "tags": [
        "Patch"
      ],
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/56354b0a2c24a7828eeed7de4b4dc9652d9affa3"
    },
    {
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
      "tags": [
        "Patch"
      ],
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6b598069164ac1bb60996d6ff94e7f9169dbd2d3"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
  "vulnStatus": "Analyzed",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-667"
        }
      ],
      "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
      "type": "Primary"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.


Loading…

Loading…