fkie_cve-2024-53179
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2024-12-27 14:15
Modified
2025-02-10 18:15
Severity ?
7.8 (High) - CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
7.8 (High) - CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
7.8 (High) - CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
smb: client: fix use-after-free of signing key
Customers have reported use-after-free in @ses->auth_key.response with
SMB2.1 + sign mounts which occurs due to following race:
task A task B
cifs_mount()
dfs_mount_share()
get_session()
cifs_mount_get_session() cifs_send_recv()
cifs_get_smb_ses() compound_send_recv()
cifs_setup_session() smb2_setup_request()
kfree_sensitive() smb2_calc_signature()
crypto_shash_setkey() *UAF*
Fix this by ensuring that we have a valid @ses->auth_key.response by
checking whether @ses->ses_status is SES_GOOD or SES_EXITING with
@ses->ses_lock held. After commit 24a9799aa8ef ("smb: client: fix UAF
in smb2_reconnect_server()"), we made sure to call ->logoff() only
when @ses was known to be good (e.g. valid ->auth_key.response), so
it's safe to access signing key when @ses->ses_status == SES_EXITING.
References
Impacted products
Vendor | Product | Version | |
---|---|---|---|
linux | linux_kernel | * | |
linux | linux_kernel | * |
{ "configurations": [ { "nodes": [ { "cpeMatch": [ { "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "matchCriteriaId": "A5CDA440-0233-41C3-A5AE-5DE4FD068A1D", "versionEndExcluding": "6.6.70", "vulnerable": true }, { "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "matchCriteriaId": "9C535878-0221-4BBF-824E-700AF4DD09BF", "versionEndExcluding": "6.12.2", "versionStartIncluding": "6.7", "vulnerable": true } ], "negate": false, "operator": "OR" } ] } ], "cveTags": [], "descriptions": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nsmb: client: fix use-after-free of signing key\n\nCustomers have reported use-after-free in @ses-\u003eauth_key.response with\nSMB2.1 + sign mounts which occurs due to following race:\n\ntask A task B\ncifs_mount()\n dfs_mount_share()\n get_session()\n cifs_mount_get_session() cifs_send_recv()\n cifs_get_smb_ses() compound_send_recv()\n cifs_setup_session() smb2_setup_request()\n kfree_sensitive() smb2_calc_signature()\n crypto_shash_setkey() *UAF*\n\nFix this by ensuring that we have a valid @ses-\u003eauth_key.response by\nchecking whether @ses-\u003eses_status is SES_GOOD or SES_EXITING with\n@ses-\u003eses_lock held. After commit 24a9799aa8ef (\"smb: client: fix UAF\nin smb2_reconnect_server()\"), we made sure to call -\u003elogoff() only\nwhen @ses was known to be good (e.g. valid -\u003eauth_key.response), so\nit\u0027s safe to access signing key when @ses-\u003eses_status == SES_EXITING." }, { "lang": "es", "value": "En el kernel de Linux, se ha resuelto la siguiente vulnerabilidad: smb: cliente: se corrige el use-after-free de la clave de firma Los clientes han informado sobre el use-after-free en @ses-\u0026gt;auth_key.response con SMB2.1 + montajes de firma que se producen debido a la siguiente ejecuci\u00f3n: tarea A tarea B cifs_mount() dfs_mount_share() get_session() cifs_mount_get_session() cifs_send_recv() cifs_get_smb_ses() Compound_send_recv() cifs_setup_session() smb2_setup_request() kfree_sensitive() smb2_calc_signature() crypto_shash_setkey() *UAF* Solucione esto asegur\u00e1ndose de que tenemos un @ses-\u0026gt;auth_key.response v\u00e1lido comprobando si @ses-\u0026gt;ses_status es SES_GOOD o SES_EXITING con @ses-\u0026gt;ses_lock Despu\u00e9s de el commit 24a9799aa8ef (\"smb: cliente: corregir UAF en smb2_reconnect_server()\"), nos aseguramos de llamar a -\u0026gt;logoff() solo cuando se sab\u00eda que @ses era correcto (por ejemplo, -\u0026gt;auth_key.response v\u00e1lido), por lo que es seguro acceder a la clave de firma cuando @ses-\u0026gt;ses_status == SES_EXITING." } ], "id": "CVE-2024-53179", "lastModified": "2025-02-10T18:15:27.533", "metrics": { "cvssMetricV31": [ { "cvssData": { "attackComplexity": "LOW", "attackVector": "LOCAL", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "baseScore": 7.8, "baseSeverity": "HIGH", "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH", "integrityImpact": "HIGH", "privilegesRequired": "LOW", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "userInteraction": "NONE", "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "version": "3.1" }, "exploitabilityScore": 1.8, "impactScore": 5.9, "source": "nvd@nist.gov", "type": "Primary" }, { "cvssData": { "attackComplexity": "LOW", "attackVector": "LOCAL", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "baseScore": 7.8, "baseSeverity": "HIGH", "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH", "integrityImpact": "HIGH", "privilegesRequired": "LOW", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "userInteraction": "NONE", "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "version": "3.1" }, "exploitabilityScore": 1.8, "impactScore": 5.9, "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0", "type": "Secondary" } ] }, "published": "2024-12-27T14:15:25.307", "references": [ { "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", "tags": [ "Patch" ], "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0e2b654a3848bf9da3b0d54c1ccf3f1b8c635591" }, { "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", "tags": [ "Patch" ], "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/343d7fe6df9e247671440a932b6a73af4fa86d95" }, { "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", "tags": [ "Patch" ], "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/39619c65ab4bbb3e78c818f537687653e112764d" } ], "sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", "vulnStatus": "Modified", "weaknesses": [ { "description": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "CWE-416" } ], "source": "nvd@nist.gov", "type": "Primary" }, { "description": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "CWE-416" } ], "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0", "type": "Secondary" } ] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…