fkie_cve-2024-56549
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2024-12-27 14:15
Modified
2025-02-21 14:15
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: cachefiles: Fix NULL pointer dereference in object->file At present, the object->file has the NULL pointer dereference problem in ondemand-mode. The root cause is that the allocated fd and object->file lifetime are inconsistent, and the user-space invocation to anon_fd uses object->file. Following is the process that triggers the issue: [write fd] [umount] cachefiles_ondemand_fd_write_iter fscache_cookie_state_machine cachefiles_withdraw_cookie if (!file) return -ENOBUFS cachefiles_clean_up_object cachefiles_unmark_inode_in_use fput(object->file) object->file = NULL // file NULL pointer dereference! __cachefiles_write(..., file, ...) Fix this issue by add an additional reference count to the object->file before write/llseek, and decrement after it finished.
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
linux linux_kernel *
linux linux_kernel *



{
  "configurations": [
    {
      "nodes": [
        {
          "cpeMatch": [
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "A482F6D5-4DB0-4611-AF23-1D568CE9F2BF",
              "versionEndExcluding": "6.11.11",
              "versionStartIncluding": "5.19",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "D8882B1B-2ABC-4838-AC1D-DBDBB5764776",
              "versionEndExcluding": "6.12.2",
              "versionStartIncluding": "6.12",
              "vulnerable": true
            }
          ],
          "negate": false,
          "operator": "OR"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\ncachefiles: Fix NULL pointer dereference in object-\u003efile\n\nAt present, the object-\u003efile has the NULL pointer dereference problem in\nondemand-mode. The root cause is that the allocated fd and object-\u003efile\nlifetime are inconsistent, and the user-space invocation to anon_fd uses\nobject-\u003efile. Following is the process that triggers the issue:\n\n\t  [write fd]\t\t\t\t[umount]\ncachefiles_ondemand_fd_write_iter\n\t\t\t\t       fscache_cookie_state_machine\n\t\t\t\t\t cachefiles_withdraw_cookie\n  if (!file) return -ENOBUFS\n\t\t\t\t\t   cachefiles_clean_up_object\n\t\t\t\t\t     cachefiles_unmark_inode_in_use\n\t\t\t\t\t     fput(object-\u003efile)\n\t\t\t\t\t     object-\u003efile = NULL\n  // file NULL pointer dereference!\n  __cachefiles_write(..., file, ...)\n\nFix this issue by add an additional reference count to the object-\u003efile\nbefore write/llseek, and decrement after it finished."
    },
    {
      "lang": "es",
      "value": "En el kernel de Linux, se ha resuelto la siguiente vulnerabilidad: cachefiles: Arreglar la desreferencia de puntero NULL en object-\u0026gt;file En la actualidad, object-\u0026gt;file tiene el problema de desreferencia de puntero NULL en el modo ondemand. La causa ra\u00edz es que el fd asignado y el tiempo de vida de object-\u0026gt;file son inconsistentes, y la invocaci\u00f3n del espacio de usuario a anon_fd usa object-\u0026gt;file. A continuaci\u00f3n, se muestra el proceso que desencadena el problema: [write fd] [umount] cachefiles_ondemand_fd_write_iter fscache_cookie_state_machine cachefiles_withdraw_cookie if (!file) return -ENOBUFS cachefiles_clean_up_object cachefiles_unmark_inode_in_use fput(object-\u0026gt;file) object-\u0026gt;file = NULL // file \u00a1Desreferencia de puntero NULL! __cachefiles_write(..., file, ...) Solucione este problema agregando un recuento de referencia adicional al objeto-\u0026gt;archivo antes de escribir/llseek, y disminuya despu\u00e9s de que finalice."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2024-56549",
  "lastModified": "2025-02-21T14:15:50.947",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV31": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "LOW",
          "attackVector": "LOCAL",
          "availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
          "baseScore": 5.5,
          "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
          "confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
          "integrityImpact": "NONE",
          "privilegesRequired": "LOW",
          "scope": "UNCHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "NONE",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 1.8,
        "impactScore": 3.6,
        "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
        "type": "Primary"
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2024-12-27T14:15:34.747",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
      "tags": [
        "Patch"
      ],
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/31ad74b20227ce6b40910ff78b1c604e42975cf1"
    },
    {
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/785408bbafcfa24c9fc5b251f03fd0780ce182bd"
    },
    {
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
      "tags": [
        "Patch"
      ],
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/9582c7664103c9043e80a78f5c382aa6bdd67418"
    },
    {
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d6bba3ece960129a553d4b16f1b00c884dc0993a"
    },
    {
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
      "tags": [
        "Patch"
      ],
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f98770440c9bc468e2fd878212ec9526dbe08293"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
  "vulnStatus": "Modified",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-476"
        }
      ],
      "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
      "type": "Primary"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.


Loading…

Loading…