fkie_cve-2024-57982
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2025-02-27 02:15
Modified
2025-03-07 15:09
Severity ?
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
xfrm: state: fix out-of-bounds read during lookup
lookup and resize can run in parallel.
The xfrm_state_hash_generation seqlock ensures a retry, but the hash
functions can observe a hmask value that is too large for the new hlist
array.
rehash does:
rcu_assign_pointer(net->xfrm.state_bydst, ndst) [..]
net->xfrm.state_hmask = nhashmask;
While state lookup does:
h = xfrm_dst_hash(net, daddr, saddr, tmpl->reqid, encap_family);
hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(x, net->xfrm.state_bydst + h, bydst) {
This is only safe in case the update to state_bydst is larger than
net->xfrm.xfrm_state_hmask (or if the lookup function gets
serialized via state spinlock again).
Fix this by prefetching state_hmask and the associated pointers.
The xfrm_state_hash_generation seqlock retry will ensure that the pointer
and the hmask will be consistent.
The existing helpers, like xfrm_dst_hash(), are now unsafe for RCU side,
add lockdep assertions to document that they are only safe for insert
side.
xfrm_state_lookup_byaddr() uses the spinlock rather than RCU.
AFAICS this is an oversight from back when state lookup was converted to
RCU, this lock should be replaced with RCU in a future patch.
References
Impacted products
Vendor | Product | Version | |
---|---|---|---|
linux | linux_kernel | * | |
linux | linux_kernel | * |
{ "configurations": [ { "nodes": [ { "cpeMatch": [ { "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "matchCriteriaId": "1F3C05B7-5F93-443D-9334-0B93D74DDA67", "versionEndExcluding": "6.12.13", "versionStartIncluding": "4.9", "vulnerable": true }, { "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "matchCriteriaId": "6D4116B1-1BFD-4F23-BA84-169CC05FC5A3", "versionEndExcluding": "6.13.2", "versionStartIncluding": "6.13", "vulnerable": true } ], "negate": false, "operator": "OR" } ] } ], "cveTags": [], "descriptions": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nxfrm: state: fix out-of-bounds read during lookup\n\nlookup and resize can run in parallel.\n\nThe xfrm_state_hash_generation seqlock ensures a retry, but the hash\nfunctions can observe a hmask value that is too large for the new hlist\narray.\n\nrehash does:\n rcu_assign_pointer(net-\u003exfrm.state_bydst, ndst) [..]\n net-\u003exfrm.state_hmask = nhashmask;\n\nWhile state lookup does:\n h = xfrm_dst_hash(net, daddr, saddr, tmpl-\u003ereqid, encap_family);\n hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(x, net-\u003exfrm.state_bydst + h, bydst) {\n\nThis is only safe in case the update to state_bydst is larger than\nnet-\u003exfrm.xfrm_state_hmask (or if the lookup function gets\nserialized via state spinlock again).\n\nFix this by prefetching state_hmask and the associated pointers.\nThe xfrm_state_hash_generation seqlock retry will ensure that the pointer\nand the hmask will be consistent.\n\nThe existing helpers, like xfrm_dst_hash(), are now unsafe for RCU side,\nadd lockdep assertions to document that they are only safe for insert\nside.\n\nxfrm_state_lookup_byaddr() uses the spinlock rather than RCU.\nAFAICS this is an oversight from back when state lookup was converted to\nRCU, this lock should be replaced with RCU in a future patch." }, { "lang": "es", "value": "En el kernel de Linux, se ha resuelto la siguiente vulnerabilidad: xfrm: state: fix out-of-limits read during lookup lookup and resize can run in parallel. El xfrm_state_hash_generation seqlock ensures a retry, but the hash functions can observe a hmask value that is too large for the new hlist array. rehash does: rcu_assign_pointer(net-\u0026gt;xfrm.state_bydst, ndst) [..] net-\u0026gt;xfrm.state_hmask = nhashmask; While state lookup does: h = xfrm_dst_hash(net, daddr, saddr, tmpl-\u0026gt;reqid, encap_family); hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(x, net-\u0026gt;xfrm.state_bydst + h, bydst) { This is only safe in case the update to state_bydst is larger than net-\u0026gt;xfrm.xfrm_state_hmask (or if the lookup function gets serialized via state spinlock again). Solucione esto al precargar state_hmask y los punteros asociados. El reintento de seqlock xfrm_state_hash_generation asegurar\u00e1 que el puntero y el hmask sean consistentes. Los ayudantes existentes, como xfrm_dst_hash(), ahora no son seguros para el lado de RCU, agregue afirmaciones lockdep para documentar que solo son seguros para el lado de inserci\u00f3n. xfrm_state_lookup_byaddr() usa el bloqueo giratorio en lugar de RCU. AFAICS esto es un descuido de cuando la b\u00fasqueda de estado se convirti\u00f3 a RCU, este bloqueo debe reemplazarse con RCU en un parche futuro." } ], "id": "CVE-2024-57982", "lastModified": "2025-03-07T15:09:56.020", "metrics": { "cvssMetricV31": [ { "cvssData": { "attackComplexity": "LOW", "attackVector": "LOCAL", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "baseScore": 7.1, "baseSeverity": "HIGH", "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH", "integrityImpact": "NONE", "privilegesRequired": "LOW", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "userInteraction": "NONE", "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H", "version": "3.1" }, "exploitabilityScore": 1.8, "impactScore": 5.2, "source": "nvd@nist.gov", "type": "Primary" } ] }, "published": "2025-02-27T02:15:11.397", "references": [ { "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", "tags": [ "Mailing List", "Patch" ], "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a16871c7832ea6435abb6e0b58289ae7dcb7e4fc" }, { "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", "tags": [ "Mailing List", "Patch" ], "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/dd4c2a174994238d55ab54da2545543d36f4e0d0" }, { "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", "tags": [ "Mailing List", "Patch" ], "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e952837f3ddb0ff726d5b582aa1aad9aa38d024d" } ], "sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", "vulnStatus": "Analyzed", "weaknesses": [ { "description": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "CWE-125" } ], "source": "nvd@nist.gov", "type": "Primary" } ] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…