fkie_cve-2025-1293
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2025-02-20 01:15
Modified
2025-02-20 01:15
Severity ?
Summary
Hermes versions up to 0.4.0 improperly validated the JWT provided when using the AWS ALB authentication mode, potentially allowing for authentication bypass. This vulnerability, CVE-2025-1293, was fixed in Hermes 0.5.0.
References
Impacted products
Vendor | Product | Version |
---|
{ "cveTags": [], "descriptions": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "Hermes versions up to 0.4.0 improperly validated the JWT provided when using the AWS ALB authentication mode, potentially allowing for authentication bypass. This vulnerability, CVE-2025-1293, was fixed in Hermes 0.5.0." }, { "lang": "es", "value": "Las versiones de Hermes de hasta 0.4.0 validaron incorrectamente el JWT proporcionado cuando se usa el modo de autenticaci\u00f3n AWS Alb, lo que puede permitir el bypass de autenticaci\u00f3n. Esta vulnerabilidad, CVE-2025-1293, se fij\u00f3 en Hermes 0.5.0." } ], "id": "CVE-2025-1293", "lastModified": "2025-02-20T01:15:09.950", "metrics": { "cvssMetricV31": [ { "cvssData": { "attackComplexity": "LOW", "attackVector": "ADJACENT_NETWORK", "availabilityImpact": "NONE", "baseScore": 8.2, "baseSeverity": "HIGH", "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH", "integrityImpact": "LOW", "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "scope": "CHANGED", "userInteraction": "NONE", "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N", "version": "3.1" }, "exploitabilityScore": 2.8, "impactScore": 4.7, "source": "security@hashicorp.com", "type": "Secondary" } ] }, "published": "2025-02-20T01:15:09.950", "references": [ { "source": "security@hashicorp.com", "url": "https://discuss.hashicorp.com/t/hcsec-2025-03-hashicorp-hermes-improperly-validates-aws-alb-jwts-which-may-lead-to-authentication-bypass/73371" } ], "sourceIdentifier": "security@hashicorp.com", "vulnStatus": "Awaiting Analysis", "weaknesses": [ { "description": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "CWE-1390" } ], "source": "security@hashicorp.com", "type": "Secondary" } ] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…