fkie_cve-2025-1713
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2025-07-17 14:15
Modified
2025-07-17 21:15
Severity ?
7.5 (High) - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Summary
When setting up interrupt remapping for legacy PCI(-X) devices, including PCI(-X) bridges, a lookup of the upstream bridge is required. This lookup, itself involving acquiring of a lock, is done in a context where acquiring that lock is unsafe. This can lead to a deadlock.
References
security@xen.orghttps://xenbits.xenproject.org/xsa/advisory-467.html
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2025/02/27/1
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2025/02/27/3
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2025/02/28/1
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108http://xenbits.xen.org/xsa/advisory-467.html
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version


To clipboard 

{
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "When setting up interrupt remapping for legacy PCI(-X) devices,\nincluding PCI(-X) bridges, a lookup of the upstream bridge is required.\nThis lookup, itself involving acquiring of a lock, is done in a context\nwhere acquiring that lock is unsafe.  This can lead to a deadlock."
    },
    {
      "lang": "es",
      "value": "Al configurar la reasignaci\u00f3n de interrupciones para dispositivos PCI(-X) antiguos, incluidos los puentes PCI(-X), se requiere una b\u00fasqueda del puente ascendente. Esta b\u00fasqueda, que implica la adquisici\u00f3n de un bloqueo, se realiza en un contexto donde la adquisici\u00f3n de dicho bloqueo no es segura. Esto puede provocar un interbloqueo."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2025-1713",
  "lastModified": "2025-07-17T21:15:50.197",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV31": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "LOW",
          "attackVector": "NETWORK",
          "availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
          "baseScore": 7.5,
          "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
          "confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
          "integrityImpact": "NONE",
          "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
          "scope": "UNCHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "NONE",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 3.9,
        "impactScore": 3.6,
        "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
        "type": "Secondary"
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2025-07-17T14:15:30.527",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "security@xen.org",
      "url": "https://xenbits.xenproject.org/xsa/advisory-467.html"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2025/02/27/1"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2025/02/27/3"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2025/02/28/1"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "url": "http://xenbits.xen.org/xsa/advisory-467.html"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "security@xen.org",
  "vulnStatus": "Awaiting Analysis",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-833"
        }
      ],
      "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
      "type": "Secondary"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.