fkie_cve-2025-21961
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2025-04-01 16:15
Modified
2025-04-14 12:45
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: eth: bnxt: fix truesize for mb-xdp-pass case When mb-xdp is set and return is XDP_PASS, packet is converted from xdp_buff to sk_buff with xdp_update_skb_shared_info() in bnxt_xdp_build_skb(). bnxt_xdp_build_skb() passes incorrect truesize argument to xdp_update_skb_shared_info(). The truesize is calculated as BNXT_RX_PAGE_SIZE * sinfo->nr_frags but the skb_shared_info was wiped by napi_build_skb() before. So it stores sinfo->nr_frags before bnxt_xdp_build_skb() and use it instead of getting skb_shared_info from xdp_get_shared_info_from_buff(). Splat looks like: ------------[ cut here ]------------ WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 0 at net/core/skbuff.c:6072 skb_try_coalesce+0x504/0x590 Modules linked in: xt_nat xt_tcpudp veth af_packet xt_conntrack nft_chain_nat xt_MASQUERADE nf_conntrack_netlink xfrm_user xt_addrtype nft_coms CPU: 2 UID: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/2 Not tainted 6.14.0-rc2+ #3 RIP: 0010:skb_try_coalesce+0x504/0x590 Code: 4b fd ff ff 49 8b 34 24 40 80 e6 40 0f 84 3d fd ff ff 49 8b 74 24 48 40 f6 c6 01 0f 84 2e fd ff ff 48 8d 4e ff e9 25 fd ff ff <0f> 0b e99 RSP: 0018:ffffb62c4120caa8 EFLAGS: 00010287 RAX: 0000000000000003 RBX: ffffb62c4120cb14 RCX: 0000000000000ec0 RDX: 0000000000001000 RSI: ffffa06e5d7dc000 RDI: 0000000000000003 RBP: ffffa06e5d7ddec0 R08: ffffa06e6120a800 R09: ffffa06e7a119900 R10: 0000000000002310 R11: ffffa06e5d7dcec0 R12: ffffe4360575f740 R13: ffffe43600000000 R14: 0000000000000002 R15: 0000000000000002 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffffa0755f700000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007f147b76b0f8 CR3: 00000001615d4000 CR4: 00000000007506f0 PKRU: 55555554 Call Trace: <IRQ> ? __warn+0x84/0x130 ? skb_try_coalesce+0x504/0x590 ? report_bug+0x18a/0x1a0 ? handle_bug+0x53/0x90 ? exc_invalid_op+0x14/0x70 ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x16/0x20 ? skb_try_coalesce+0x504/0x590 inet_frag_reasm_finish+0x11f/0x2e0 ip_defrag+0x37a/0x900 ip_local_deliver+0x51/0x120 ip_sublist_rcv_finish+0x64/0x70 ip_sublist_rcv+0x179/0x210 ip_list_rcv+0xf9/0x130 How to reproduce: <Node A> ip link set $interface1 xdp obj xdp_pass.o ip link set $interface1 mtu 9000 up ip a a 10.0.0.1/24 dev $interface1 <Node B> ip link set $interfac2 mtu 9000 up ip a a 10.0.0.2/24 dev $interface2 ping 10.0.0.1 -s 65000 Following ping.py patch adds xdp-mb-pass case. so ping.py is going to be able to reproduce this issue.
Impacted products



{
  "configurations": [
    {
      "nodes": [
        {
          "cpeMatch": [
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "B1170862-E3A2-4452-B8A3-EB09329034E5",
              "versionEndExcluding": "6.12.20",
              "versionStartIncluding": "5.19",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "0A20D4D7-B329-4C68-B662-76062EA7DCF0",
              "versionEndExcluding": "6.13.8",
              "versionStartIncluding": "6.13",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.14:rc1:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "186716B6-2B66-4BD0-852E-D48E71C0C85F",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.14:rc2:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "0D3E781C-403A-498F-9DA9-ECEE50F41E75",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.14:rc3:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "66619FB8-0AAF-4166-B2CF-67B24143261D",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.14:rc4:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "D3D6550E-6679-4560-902D-AF52DCFE905B",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.14:rc5:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "45B90F6B-BEC7-4D4E-883A-9DBADE021750",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.14:rc6:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "1759FFB7-531C-41B1-9AE1-FD3D80E0D920",
              "vulnerable": true
            }
          ],
          "negate": false,
          "operator": "OR"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\neth: bnxt: fix truesize for mb-xdp-pass case\n\nWhen mb-xdp is set and return is XDP_PASS, packet is converted from\nxdp_buff to sk_buff with xdp_update_skb_shared_info() in\nbnxt_xdp_build_skb().\nbnxt_xdp_build_skb() passes incorrect truesize argument to\nxdp_update_skb_shared_info().\nThe truesize is calculated as BNXT_RX_PAGE_SIZE * sinfo-\u003enr_frags but\nthe skb_shared_info was wiped by napi_build_skb() before.\nSo it stores sinfo-\u003enr_frags before bnxt_xdp_build_skb() and use it\ninstead of getting skb_shared_info from xdp_get_shared_info_from_buff().\n\nSplat looks like:\n ------------[ cut here ]------------\n WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 0 at net/core/skbuff.c:6072 skb_try_coalesce+0x504/0x590\n Modules linked in: xt_nat xt_tcpudp veth af_packet xt_conntrack nft_chain_nat xt_MASQUERADE nf_conntrack_netlink xfrm_user xt_addrtype nft_coms\n CPU: 2 UID: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/2 Not tainted 6.14.0-rc2+ #3\n RIP: 0010:skb_try_coalesce+0x504/0x590\n Code: 4b fd ff ff 49 8b 34 24 40 80 e6 40 0f 84 3d fd ff ff 49 8b 74 24 48 40 f6 c6 01 0f 84 2e fd ff ff 48 8d 4e ff e9 25 fd ff ff \u003c0f\u003e 0b e99\n RSP: 0018:ffffb62c4120caa8 EFLAGS: 00010287\n RAX: 0000000000000003 RBX: ffffb62c4120cb14 RCX: 0000000000000ec0\n RDX: 0000000000001000 RSI: ffffa06e5d7dc000 RDI: 0000000000000003\n RBP: ffffa06e5d7ddec0 R08: ffffa06e6120a800 R09: ffffa06e7a119900\n R10: 0000000000002310 R11: ffffa06e5d7dcec0 R12: ffffe4360575f740\n R13: ffffe43600000000 R14: 0000000000000002 R15: 0000000000000002\n FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffffa0755f700000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000\n CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033\n CR2: 00007f147b76b0f8 CR3: 00000001615d4000 CR4: 00000000007506f0\n PKRU: 55555554\n Call Trace:\n  \u003cIRQ\u003e\n  ? __warn+0x84/0x130\n  ? skb_try_coalesce+0x504/0x590\n  ? report_bug+0x18a/0x1a0\n  ? handle_bug+0x53/0x90\n  ? exc_invalid_op+0x14/0x70\n  ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x16/0x20\n  ? skb_try_coalesce+0x504/0x590\n  inet_frag_reasm_finish+0x11f/0x2e0\n  ip_defrag+0x37a/0x900\n  ip_local_deliver+0x51/0x120\n  ip_sublist_rcv_finish+0x64/0x70\n  ip_sublist_rcv+0x179/0x210\n  ip_list_rcv+0xf9/0x130\n\nHow to reproduce:\n\u003cNode A\u003e\nip link set $interface1 xdp obj xdp_pass.o\nip link set $interface1 mtu 9000 up\nip a a 10.0.0.1/24 dev $interface1\n\u003cNode B\u003e\nip link set $interfac2 mtu 9000 up\nip a a 10.0.0.2/24 dev $interface2\nping 10.0.0.1 -s 65000\n\nFollowing ping.py patch adds xdp-mb-pass case. so ping.py is going to be\nable to reproduce this issue."
    },
    {
      "lang": "es",
      "value": "En el kernel de Linux, se ha resuelto la siguiente vulnerabilidad: eth: bnxt: correcci\u00f3n de truesize para el caso mb-xdp-pass. Cuando mb-xdp est\u00e1 configurado y el valor de retorno es XDP_PASS, el paquete se convierte de xdp_buff a sk_buff con xdp_update_skb_shared_info() en bnxt_xdp_build_skb(). bnxt_xdp_build_skb() pasa un argumento truesize incorrecto a xdp_update_skb_shared_info(). El truesize se calcula como BNXT_RX_PAGE_SIZE * sinfo-\u0026gt;nr_frags, pero napi_build_skb() borr\u00f3 previamente skb_shared_info. De este modo, almacena sinfo-\u0026gt;nr_frags antes de bnxt_xdp_build_skb() y lo utiliza en lugar de obtener skb_shared_info de xdp_get_shared_info_from_buff(). El splat se ve as\u00ed: ------------[ cortar aqu\u00ed ]------------ ADVERTENCIA: CPU: 2 PID: 0 en net/core/skbuff.c:6072 skb_try_coalesce+0x504/0x590 M\u00f3dulos enlazados en: xt_nat xt_tcpudp veth af_packet xt_conntrack nft_chain_nat xt_MASQUERADE nf_conntrack_netlink xfrm_user xt_addrtype nft_coms CPU: 2 UID: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/2 No contaminado 6.14.0-rc2+ #3 RIP: 0010:skb_try_coalesce+0x504/0x590 C\u00f3digo: 4b fd ff ff 49 8b 34 24 40 80 e6 40 0f 84 3d fd ff ff 49 8b 74 24 48 40 f6 c6 01 0f 84 2e fd ff ff 48 8d 4e ff e9 25 fd ff ff \u0026lt;0f\u0026gt; 0b e99 RSP: 0018:ffffb62c4120caa8 EFLAGS: 00010287 RAX: 000000000000003 RBX: ffffb62c4120cb14 RCX: 0000000000000ec0 RDX: 0000000000001000 RSI: ffffa06e5d7dc000 RDI: 000000000000003 RBP: ffffa06e5d7ddec0 R08: ffffa06e6120a800 R09: ffffa06e7a119900 R10: 0000000000002310 R11: ffffa06e5d7dcec0 R12: ffffe4360575f740 R13: ffffe43600000000 R14: 000000000000002 R15: 0000000000000002 FS: 000000000000000(0000) GS:ffffa0755f700000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007f147b76b0f8 CR3: 00000001615d4000 CR4: 00000000007506f0 PKRU: 55555554 Rastreo de llamadas:  ? __warn+0x84/0x130 ? skb_try_coalesce+0x504/0x590 ? report_bug+0x18a/0x1a0 ? handle_bug+0x53/0x90 ? exc_invalid_op+0x14/0x70 ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x16/0x20 ? skb_try_coalesce+0x504/0x590 inet_frag_reasm_finish+0x11f/0x2e0 ip_defrag+0x37a/0x900 ip_local_deliver+0x51/0x120 ip_sublist_rcv_finish+0x64/0x70 ip_sublist_rcv+0x179/0x210 ip_list_rcv+0xf9/0x130 C\u00f3mo reproducir:  enlace ip establecido $interfaz1 xdp obj xdp_pass.o enlace ip establecido $interfaz1 mtu 9000 activo ip aa 10.0.0.1/24 dev $interfaz1  enlace ip establecido $interfaz2 mtu 9000 activo ip aa 10.0.0.2/24 El siguiente parche de ping.py agrega el caso xdp-mb-pass, por lo que ping.py podr\u00e1 reproducir este problema."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2025-21961",
  "lastModified": "2025-04-14T12:45:14.773",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV31": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "LOW",
          "attackVector": "LOCAL",
          "availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
          "baseScore": 5.5,
          "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
          "confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
          "integrityImpact": "NONE",
          "privilegesRequired": "LOW",
          "scope": "UNCHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "NONE",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 1.8,
        "impactScore": 3.6,
        "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
        "type": "Primary"
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2025-04-01T16:15:27.343",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
      "tags": [
        "Patch"
      ],
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/19107e71be330dbccb9f8f9f4cf0a9abeadad802"
    },
    {
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
      "tags": [
        "Patch"
      ],
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/9f7b2aa5034e24d3c49db73d5f760c0435fe31c2"
    },
    {
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
      "tags": [
        "Patch"
      ],
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b4679807c6083ade4d47f03f80da891afcb6ef62"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
  "vulnStatus": "Analyzed",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "NVD-CWE-noinfo"
        }
      ],
      "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
      "type": "Primary"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.


Loading…

Loading…