fkie_cve-2025-32051
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2025-04-03 14:15
Modified
2025-04-07 14:18
Severity ?
Summary
A flaw was found in libsoup. The libsoup soup_uri_decode_data_uri() function may crash when processing malformed data URI. This flaw allows an attacker to cause a denial of service (DoS).
References
Impacted products
Vendor | Product | Version |
---|
{ "cveTags": [], "descriptions": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "A flaw was found in libsoup. The libsoup soup_uri_decode_data_uri() function may crash when processing malformed data URI. This flaw allows an attacker to cause a denial of service (DoS)." }, { "lang": "es", "value": "Se encontr\u00f3 una falla en libsoup. La funci\u00f3n soup_uri_decode_data_uri() de libsoup puede bloquearse al procesar una URL de datos mal formada. Esta falla permite a un atacante causar una denegaci\u00f3n de servicio (DoS)." } ], "id": "CVE-2025-32051", "lastModified": "2025-04-07T14:18:34.453", "metrics": { "cvssMetricV31": [ { "cvssData": { "attackComplexity": "HIGH", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "baseScore": 5.9, "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM", "confidentialityImpact": "NONE", "integrityImpact": "NONE", "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "userInteraction": "NONE", "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H", "version": "3.1" }, "exploitabilityScore": 2.2, "impactScore": 3.6, "source": "secalert@redhat.com", "type": "Secondary" } ] }, "published": "2025-04-03T14:15:43.903", "references": [ { "source": "secalert@redhat.com", "url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-32051" }, { "source": "secalert@redhat.com", "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2357068" } ], "sourceIdentifier": "secalert@redhat.com", "vulnStatus": "Awaiting Analysis", "weaknesses": [ { "description": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "CWE-754" } ], "source": "secalert@redhat.com", "type": "Secondary" } ] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…