fkie_cve-2025-37850
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2025-05-09 07:16
Modified
2025-05-12 17:32
Severity ?
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
pwm: mediatek: Prevent divide-by-zero in pwm_mediatek_config()
With CONFIG_COMPILE_TEST && !CONFIG_HAVE_CLK, pwm_mediatek_config() has a
divide-by-zero in the following line:
do_div(resolution, clk_get_rate(pc->clk_pwms[pwm->hwpwm]));
due to the fact that the !CONFIG_HAVE_CLK version of clk_get_rate()
returns zero.
This is presumably just a theoretical problem: COMPILE_TEST overrides
the dependency on RALINK which would select COMMON_CLK. Regardless it's
a good idea to check for the error explicitly to avoid divide-by-zero.
Fixes the following warning:
drivers/pwm/pwm-mediatek.o: warning: objtool: .text: unexpected end of section
[ukleinek: s/CONFIG_CLK/CONFIG_HAVE_CLK/]
References
Impacted products
Vendor | Product | Version |
---|
{ "cveTags": [], "descriptions": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\npwm: mediatek: Prevent divide-by-zero in pwm_mediatek_config()\n\nWith CONFIG_COMPILE_TEST \u0026\u0026 !CONFIG_HAVE_CLK, pwm_mediatek_config() has a\ndivide-by-zero in the following line:\n\n\tdo_div(resolution, clk_get_rate(pc-\u003eclk_pwms[pwm-\u003ehwpwm]));\n\ndue to the fact that the !CONFIG_HAVE_CLK version of clk_get_rate()\nreturns zero.\n\nThis is presumably just a theoretical problem: COMPILE_TEST overrides\nthe dependency on RALINK which would select COMMON_CLK. Regardless it\u0027s\na good idea to check for the error explicitly to avoid divide-by-zero.\n\nFixes the following warning:\n\n drivers/pwm/pwm-mediatek.o: warning: objtool: .text: unexpected end of section\n\n[ukleinek: s/CONFIG_CLK/CONFIG_HAVE_CLK/]" }, { "lang": "es", "value": "En el kernel de Linux, se ha resuelto la siguiente vulnerabilidad: pwm: mediatek: Evitar la divisi\u00f3n por cero en pwm_mediatek_config(). Con CONFIG_COMPILE_TEST y !CONFIG_HAVE_CLK, pwm_mediatek_config() presenta una divisi\u00f3n por cero en la siguiente l\u00ednea: do_div(resolution, clk_get_rate(pc-\u0026gt;clk_pwms[pwm-\u0026gt;hwpwm])); debido a que la versi\u00f3n !CONFIG_HAVE_CLK de clk_get_rate() devuelve cero. Se supone que se trata de un problema te\u00f3rico: COMPILE_TEST anula la dependencia de RALINK, que seleccionar\u00eda COMMON_CLK. En cualquier caso, es recomendable comprobar el error expl\u00edcitamente para evitar la divisi\u00f3n por cero. Corrige la siguiente advertencia: drivers/pwm/pwm-mediatek.o: advertencia: objtool: .text: final inesperado de secci\u00f3n [ukleinek: s/CONFIG_CLK/CONFIG_HAVE_CLK/]" } ], "id": "CVE-2025-37850", "lastModified": "2025-05-12T17:32:52.810", "metrics": {}, "published": "2025-05-09T07:16:05.887", "references": [ { "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4cb15042b5f3ec0474e91cf379120cc597625dbb" }, { "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/77fb96dbe350e8a5ae4965ff9f6e7049f3966a6b" }, { "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7ca59947b5fcf94e7ea4029d1bd0f7c41500a161" }, { "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8b9f60725d74b72c238e4437c957d0217746b506" }, { "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8ddbec73ea2598d8414e8f7103241b55cf877010" }, { "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c343856ff2689ce0afef823592732fc178ef4aac" }, { "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e1206d8e1651c9f62e5640b69b14d925b1a0a00a" }, { "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e3cf0c38d3ce754ad63005102fcfeb0b7ff3290b" }, { "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f3e9cf266c2c103cf071e15d7a17e2c699fff3c5" } ], "sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", "vulnStatus": "Awaiting Analysis" }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…