fkie_cve-2025-38255
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2025-07-09 11:15
Modified
2025-07-10 13:17
Severity ?
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: lib/group_cpus: fix NULL pointer dereference from group_cpus_evenly() While testing null_blk with configfs, echo 0 > poll_queues will trigger following panic: BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000010 Oops: Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP NOPTI CPU: 27 UID: 0 PID: 920 Comm: bash Not tainted 6.15.0-02023-gadbdb95c8696-dirty #1238 PREEMPT(undef) Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.1-2.fc37 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:__bitmap_or+0x48/0x70 Call Trace: <TASK> __group_cpus_evenly+0x822/0x8c0 group_cpus_evenly+0x2d9/0x490 blk_mq_map_queues+0x1e/0x110 null_map_queues+0xc9/0x170 [null_blk] blk_mq_update_queue_map+0xdb/0x160 blk_mq_update_nr_hw_queues+0x22b/0x560 nullb_update_nr_hw_queues+0x71/0xf0 [null_blk] nullb_device_poll_queues_store+0xa4/0x130 [null_blk] configfs_write_iter+0x109/0x1d0 vfs_write+0x26e/0x6f0 ksys_write+0x79/0x180 __x64_sys_write+0x1d/0x30 x64_sys_call+0x45c4/0x45f0 do_syscall_64+0xa5/0x240 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e Root cause is that numgrps is set to 0, and ZERO_SIZE_PTR is returned from kcalloc(), and later ZERO_SIZE_PTR will be deferenced. Fix the problem by checking numgrps first in group_cpus_evenly(), and return NULL directly if numgrps is zero. [yukuai3@huawei.com: also fix the non-SMP version]
References
416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/29d39e0d5f16c060e32542b2cf351c09fd22b250
416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/64a99eff8dcf1f951a544e6058341b2b19a8fdbd
416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/911ef2e8a7de5b2bae8ff11fb0bd01f699e6db65
416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/df831e97739405ecbaddb85516bc7d4d1c933d6b
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version


To clipboard 

{
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nlib/group_cpus: fix NULL pointer dereference from group_cpus_evenly()\n\nWhile testing null_blk with configfs, echo 0 \u003e poll_queues will trigger\nfollowing panic:\n\nBUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000010\nOops: Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP NOPTI\nCPU: 27 UID: 0 PID: 920 Comm: bash Not tainted 6.15.0-02023-gadbdb95c8696-dirty #1238 PREEMPT(undef)\nHardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.1-2.fc37 04/01/2014\nRIP: 0010:__bitmap_or+0x48/0x70\nCall Trace:\n \u003cTASK\u003e\n __group_cpus_evenly+0x822/0x8c0\n group_cpus_evenly+0x2d9/0x490\n blk_mq_map_queues+0x1e/0x110\n null_map_queues+0xc9/0x170 [null_blk]\n blk_mq_update_queue_map+0xdb/0x160\n blk_mq_update_nr_hw_queues+0x22b/0x560\n nullb_update_nr_hw_queues+0x71/0xf0 [null_blk]\n nullb_device_poll_queues_store+0xa4/0x130 [null_blk]\n configfs_write_iter+0x109/0x1d0\n vfs_write+0x26e/0x6f0\n ksys_write+0x79/0x180\n __x64_sys_write+0x1d/0x30\n x64_sys_call+0x45c4/0x45f0\n do_syscall_64+0xa5/0x240\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e\n\nRoot cause is that numgrps is set to 0, and ZERO_SIZE_PTR is returned from\nkcalloc(), and later ZERO_SIZE_PTR will be deferenced.\n\nFix the problem by checking numgrps first in group_cpus_evenly(), and\nreturn NULL directly if numgrps is zero.\n\n[yukuai3@huawei.com: also fix the non-SMP version]"
    },
    {
      "lang": "es",
      "value": "En el kernel de Linux, se ha resuelto la siguiente vulnerabilidad: lib/group_cpus: correcci\u00f3n de la desreferencia de puntero NULL de group_cpus_evenly() Al probar null_blk con configfs, echo 0 \u0026gt; poll_queues activar\u00e1 el siguiente p\u00e1nico: ERROR: desreferencia de puntero NULL del kernel, direcci\u00f3n: 0000000000000010 Oops: Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP NOPTI CPU: 27 UID: 0 PID: 920 Comm: bash No contaminado 6.15.0-02023-gadbdb95c8696-dirty #1238 PREEMPT(undef) Nombre del hardware: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.1-2.fc37 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:__bitmap_or+0x48/0x70 Rastreo de llamadas:  __group_cpus_evenly+0x822/0x8c0 group_cpus_evenly+0x2d9/0x490 blk_mq_map_queues+0x1e/0x110 null_map_queues+0xc9/0x170 [null_blk] blk_mq_update_queue_map+0xdb/0x160 blk_mq_update_nr_hw_queues+0x22b/0x560 nullb_update_nr_hw_queues+0x71/0xf0 [null_blk] nullb_device_poll_queues_store+0xa4/0x130 [null_blk] configfs_write_iter+0x109/0x1d0 vfs_write+0x26e/0x6f0 ksys_write+0x79/0x180 __x64_sys_write+0x1d/0x30 x64_sys_call+0x45c4/0x45f0 do_syscall_64+0xa5/0x240 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e La causa principal es que numgrps est\u00e1 establecido en 0 y se devuelve ZERO_SIZE_PTR desde kcalloc(); posteriormente, se aplicar\u00e1 ZERO_SIZE_PTR. Solucione el problema comprobando primero numgrps en group_cpus_evenly() y devolviendo NULL directamente si numgrps es cero. [yukuai3@huawei.com: corrija tambi\u00e9n la versi\u00f3n sin SMP]"
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2025-38255",
  "lastModified": "2025-07-10T13:17:30.017",
  "metrics": {},
  "published": "2025-07-09T11:15:27.767",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/29d39e0d5f16c060e32542b2cf351c09fd22b250"
    },
    {
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/64a99eff8dcf1f951a544e6058341b2b19a8fdbd"
    },
    {
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/911ef2e8a7de5b2bae8ff11fb0bd01f699e6db65"
    },
    {
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/df831e97739405ecbaddb85516bc7d4d1c933d6b"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
  "vulnStatus": "Awaiting Analysis"
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.