fkie_cve-2025-38377
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2025-07-25 13:15
Modified
2025-07-25 15:29
Severity ?
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: rose: fix dangling neighbour pointers in rose_rt_device_down() There are two bugs in rose_rt_device_down() that can cause use-after-free: 1. The loop bound `t->count` is modified within the loop, which can cause the loop to terminate early and miss some entries. 2. When removing an entry from the neighbour array, the subsequent entries are moved up to fill the gap, but the loop index `i` is still incremented, causing the next entry to be skipped. For example, if a node has three neighbours (A, A, B) with count=3 and A is being removed, the second A is not checked. i=0: (A, A, B) -> (A, B) with count=2 ^ checked i=1: (A, B) -> (A, B) with count=2 ^ checked (B, not A!) i=2: (doesn't occur because i < count is false) This leaves the second A in the array with count=2, but the rose_neigh structure has been freed. Code that accesses these entries assumes that the first `count` entries are valid pointers, causing a use-after-free when it accesses the dangling pointer. Fix both issues by iterating over the array in reverse order with a fixed loop bound. This ensures that all entries are examined and that the removal of an entry doesn't affect subsequent iterations.
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version



{
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nrose: fix dangling neighbour pointers in rose_rt_device_down()\n\nThere are two bugs in rose_rt_device_down() that can cause\nuse-after-free:\n\n1. The loop bound `t-\u003ecount` is modified within the loop, which can\n   cause the loop to terminate early and miss some entries.\n\n2. When removing an entry from the neighbour array, the subsequent entries\n   are moved up to fill the gap, but the loop index `i` is still\n   incremented, causing the next entry to be skipped.\n\nFor example, if a node has three neighbours (A, A, B) with count=3 and A\nis being removed, the second A is not checked.\n\n    i=0: (A, A, B) -\u003e (A, B) with count=2\n          ^ checked\n    i=1: (A, B)    -\u003e (A, B) with count=2\n             ^ checked (B, not A!)\n    i=2: (doesn\u0027t occur because i \u003c count is false)\n\nThis leaves the second A in the array with count=2, but the rose_neigh\nstructure has been freed. Code that accesses these entries assumes that\nthe first `count` entries are valid pointers, causing a use-after-free\nwhen it accesses the dangling pointer.\n\nFix both issues by iterating over the array in reverse order with a fixed\nloop bound. This ensures that all entries are examined and that the removal\nof an entry doesn\u0027t affect subsequent iterations."
    },
    {
      "lang": "es",
      "value": "En el kernel de Linux, se ha resuelto la siguiente vulnerabilidad: rose: correcci\u00f3n de punteros vecinos colgantes en rose_rt_device_down(). Hay dos errores en rose_rt_device_down() que pueden causar un use-after-free: 1. El l\u00edmite del bucle `t-\u0026gt;count` se modifica dentro del bucle, lo que puede provocar que el bucle termine antes de tiempo y se pierdan algunas entradas. 2. Al eliminar una entrada de la matriz de vecinos, las entradas posteriores se mueven hacia arriba para llenar el espacio vac\u00edo, pero el \u00edndice del bucle `i` a\u00fan se incrementa, lo que hace que se omita la siguiente entrada. Por ejemplo, si un nodo tiene tres vecinos (A, A, B) con count=3 y se est\u00e1 eliminando A, no se comprueba el segundo A. i=0: (A, A, B) -\u0026gt; (A, B) con count=2 ^ comprobado i=1: (A, B) -\u0026gt; (A, B) con count=2 ^ comprobado (\u00a1B, no A!) i=2: (no ocurre porque i \u0026lt; count es falso) Esto deja la segunda A en el array con count=2, pero la estructura rose_neigh se ha liberado. El c\u00f3digo que accede a estas entradas asume que las primeras entradas de `count` son punteros v\u00e1lidos, lo que provoca un use-after-free al acceder al puntero colgante. Solucione ambos problemas iterando sobre el array en orden inverso con un l\u00edmite de bucle fijo. Esto garantiza que se examinen todas las entradas y que la eliminaci\u00f3n de una entrada no afecte a las iteraciones posteriores."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2025-38377",
  "lastModified": "2025-07-25T15:29:19.837",
  "metrics": {},
  "published": "2025-07-25T13:15:26.780",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2b952dbb32fef835756f07ff0cd77efbb836dfea"
    },
    {
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2c6c82ee074bfcfd1bc978ec45bfea37703d840a"
    },
    {
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/34a500caf48c47d5171f4aa1f237da39b07c6157"
    },
    {
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/446ac00b86be1670838e513b643933d78837d8db"
    },
    {
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7a1841c9609377e989ec41c16551309ce79c39e4"
    },
    {
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/94e0918e39039c47ddceb609500817f7266be756"
    },
    {
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b6b232e16e08c6dc120672b4753392df0d28c1b4"
    },
    {
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/fe62a35fb1f77f494ed534fc69a9043dc5a30ce1"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
  "vulnStatus": "Awaiting Analysis"
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.


Loading…

Loading…