fkie_cve-2025-46397
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2025-04-23 21:15
Modified
2025-05-16 14:43
Severity ?
Summary
In xfig diagramming tool, a stack-overflow while running fig2dev allows memory corruption via local input manipulation at the bezier_spline function.
References
Impacted products
Vendor | Product | Version |
---|
{ "cveTags": [], "descriptions": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "In xfig diagramming tool, a stack-overflow\u00a0while running fig2dev allows memory corruption via local input manipulation at the bezier_spline function." }, { "lang": "es", "value": "El desbordamiento de pila en fig2dev en la versi\u00f3n 3.2.9a permite a un atacante la posible ejecuci\u00f3n de c\u00f3digo mediante la manipulaci\u00f3n de entrada local mediante la funci\u00f3n bezier_spline." } ], "id": "CVE-2025-46397", "lastModified": "2025-05-16T14:43:56.797", "metrics": { "cvssMetricV31": [ { "cvssData": { "attackComplexity": "HIGH", "attackVector": "LOCAL", "availabilityImpact": "NONE", "baseScore": 4.7, "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM", "confidentialityImpact": "NONE", "integrityImpact": "HIGH", "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "userInteraction": "REQUIRED", "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N", "version": "3.1" }, "exploitabilityScore": 1.0, "impactScore": 3.6, "source": "secalert@redhat.com", "type": "Secondary" } ] }, "published": "2025-04-23T21:15:16.807", "references": [ { "source": "secalert@redhat.com", "url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-46397" }, { "source": "secalert@redhat.com", "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2362058" }, { "source": "secalert@redhat.com", "url": "https://sourceforge.net/p/mcj/tickets/192/" } ], "sourceIdentifier": "secalert@redhat.com", "vulnStatus": "Awaiting Analysis", "weaknesses": [ { "description": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "CWE-121" } ], "source": "secalert@redhat.com", "type": "Secondary" } ] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…