fkie_cve-2025-52968
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2025-06-23 15:15
Modified
2025-06-23 20:16
Summary
xdg-open in xdg-utils through 1.2.1 can send requests containing SameSite=Strict cookies, which can facilitate CSRF. (For example, xdg-open could be modified to, by default, associate x-scheme-handler/https with the execution of a browser with command-line options that arrange for an empty cookie store, although this would add substantial complexity, and would not be considered a desirable or expected behavior by all users.) NOTE: this is disputed because integrations of xdg-open typically do not provide information about whether the xdg-open command and arguments were manually entered by a user, or whether they were the result of a navigation from content in an untrusted origin.
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version



{
  "cveTags": [
    {
      "sourceIdentifier": "cve@mitre.org",
      "tags": [
        "disputed"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "xdg-open in xdg-utils through 1.2.1 can send requests containing SameSite=Strict cookies, which can facilitate CSRF. (For example, xdg-open could be modified to, by default, associate x-scheme-handler/https with the execution of a browser with command-line options that arrange for an empty cookie store, although this would add substantial complexity, and would not be considered a desirable or expected behavior by all users.) NOTE: this is disputed because integrations of xdg-open typically do not provide information about whether the xdg-open command and arguments were manually entered by a user, or whether they were the result of a navigation from content in an untrusted origin."
    },
    {
      "lang": "es",
      "value": "xdg-open en xdg-utils hasta la versi\u00f3n 1.2.1 puede enviar solicitudes que contienen cookies SameSite=Strict, lo que facilita el CSRF. (Por ejemplo, xdg-open podr\u00eda modificarse para asociar, por defecto, x-scheme-handler/https con la ejecuci\u00f3n de un navegador con opciones de l\u00ednea de comandos que gestionen un almac\u00e9n de cookies vac\u00edo, aunque esto a\u00f1adir\u00eda una complejidad considerable y no ser\u00eda considerado un comportamiento deseable ni esperado por todos los usuarios). NOTA: Esto es controvertido porque las integraciones de xdg-open no suelen proporcionar informaci\u00f3n sobre si el comando y los argumentos de xdg-open fueron introducidos manualmente por un usuario o si fueron el resultado de una navegaci\u00f3n desde contenido de un origen no confiable."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2025-52968",
  "lastModified": "2025-06-23T20:16:21.633",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV31": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "HIGH",
          "attackVector": "LOCAL",
          "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
          "baseScore": 2.7,
          "baseSeverity": "LOW",
          "confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
          "integrityImpact": "NONE",
          "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
          "scope": "CHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 1.0,
        "impactScore": 1.4,
        "source": "cve@mitre.org",
        "type": "Secondary"
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2025-06-23T15:15:29.350",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "cve@mitre.org",
      "url": "https://cgit.freedesktop.org/xdg/xdg-utils/tag/?h=v1.2.1"
    },
    {
      "source": "cve@mitre.org",
      "url": "https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2025/06/23/1"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "cve@mitre.org",
  "vulnStatus": "Awaiting Analysis",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-420"
        }
      ],
      "source": "cve@mitre.org",
      "type": "Secondary"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.


Loading…

Loading…