fkie_cve-2025-52986
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2025-07-11 16:15
Modified
2025-07-15 13:14
Severity ?
5.5 (Medium) - CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Summary
A Missing Release of Memory after Effective Lifetime vulnerability in the routing protocol daemon (rpd) of Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved allows a local, low privileged user to cause an impact to the availability of the device. When RIB sharding is enabled and a user executes one of several routing related 'show' commands, a certain amount of memory is leaked. When all available memory has been consumed rpd will crash and restart. The leak can be monitored with the CLI command: show task memory detail | match task_shard_mgmt_cookie where the allocated memory in bytes can be seen to continuously increase with each exploitation. This issue affects: Junos OS: * all versions before 21.2R3-S9, * 21.4 versions before 21.4R3-S11, * 22.2 versions before 22.2R3-S7, * 22.4 versions before 22.4R3-S7, * 23.2 versions before 23.2R2-S4,  * 23.4 versions before 23.4R2-S4, * 24.2 versions before 24.2R2, * 24.4 versions before 24.4R1-S2, 24.4R2; Junos OS Evolved: * all versions before 22.2R3-S7-EVO * 22.4-EVO versions before 22.4R3-S7-EVO, * 23.2-EVO versions before 23.2R2-S4-EVO, * 23.4-EVO versions before 23.4R2-S4-EVO, * 24.2-EVO versions before 24.2R2-EVO,  * 24.4-EVO versions before 24.4R2-EVO.
References
sirt@juniper.nethttps://supportportal.juniper.net/JSA100092
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version


To clipboard 

{
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "A Missing Release of Memory after Effective Lifetime vulnerability in the routing protocol daemon (rpd) of Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved allows a local, low privileged user to cause an impact to the availability of the device.\n\nWhen RIB sharding is enabled and a user executes one of several routing related \u0027show\u0027 commands, a certain amount of memory is leaked. When all available memory has been consumed rpd will crash and restart.\n\nThe leak can be monitored with the CLI command:\n\n\n\nshow task memory detail | match task_shard_mgmt_cookie\n\n\n\nwhere the allocated memory in bytes can be seen to continuously increase with each exploitation.\n\n\n\nThis issue affects:\n\nJunos OS:\n\n  *  all versions before 21.2R3-S9,\n  *  21.4 versions before 21.4R3-S11,\n  *  22.2 versions before 22.2R3-S7,\n  *  22.4 versions before 22.4R3-S7,\n  *  23.2 versions before 23.2R2-S4,\u00a0\n  *  23.4 versions before 23.4R2-S4,\n  *  24.2 versions before 24.2R2,\n  *  24.4 versions before 24.4R1-S2, 24.4R2;\n\n\nJunos OS Evolved:\n\n  *  all versions before 22.2R3-S7-EVO\n  *  22.4-EVO versions before 22.4R3-S7-EVO,\n  *  23.2-EVO versions before 23.2R2-S4-EVO,\n  *  23.4-EVO versions before 23.4R2-S4-EVO,\n  *  24.2-EVO versions before 24.2R2-EVO,\u00a0\n  *  24.4-EVO versions before 24.4R2-EVO."
    },
    {
      "lang": "es",
      "value": "Una vulnerabilidad de falta de liberaci\u00f3n de memoria tras el tiempo de vida \u00fatil efectivo en el daemon del protocolo de enrutamiento (rpd) de Juniper Networks Junos OS y Junos OS Evolved permite que un usuario local con pocos privilegios afecte la disponibilidad del dispositivo. Cuando se habilita la fragmentaci\u00f3n RIB y un usuario ejecuta uno de los varios comandos \"show\" relacionados con el enrutamiento, se pierde cierta cantidad de memoria. Cuando se consume toda la memoria disponible, rpd se bloquea y se reinicia. La p\u00e9rdida se puede monitorizar con el comando de la CLI: show task memory detail | match task_shard_mgmt_cookie, donde se observa que la memoria asignada en bytes aumenta continuamente con cada explotaci\u00f3n. Este problema afecta a: Junos OS: * todas las versiones anteriores a 21.2R3-S9, * versiones 21.4 anteriores a 21.4R3-S11, * versiones 22.2 anteriores a 22.2R3-S7, * versiones 22.4 anteriores a 22.4R3-S7, * versiones 23.2 anteriores a 23.2R2-S4, * versiones 23.4 anteriores a 23.4R2-S4, * versiones 24.2 anteriores a 24.2R2, * versiones 24.4 anteriores a 24.4R1-S2, 24.4R2; Junos OS Evolved: * todas las versiones anteriores a 22.2R3-S7-EVO * versiones 22.4-EVO anteriores a 22.4R3-S7-EVO, * versiones 23.2-EVO anteriores a 23.2R2-S4-EVO, * versiones 23.4-EVO anteriores a 23.4R2-S4-EVO, * versiones 24.2-EVO anteriores a 24.2R2-EVO, * versiones 24.4-EVO anteriores a 24.4R2-EVO."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2025-52986",
  "lastModified": "2025-07-15T13:14:49.980",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV31": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "LOW",
          "attackVector": "LOCAL",
          "availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
          "baseScore": 5.5,
          "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
          "confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
          "integrityImpact": "NONE",
          "privilegesRequired": "LOW",
          "scope": "UNCHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "NONE",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 1.8,
        "impactScore": 3.6,
        "source": "sirt@juniper.net",
        "type": "Primary"
      }
    ],
    "cvssMetricV40": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "Automatable": "YES",
          "Recovery": "AUTOMATIC",
          "Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "attackComplexity": "LOW",
          "attackRequirements": "NONE",
          "attackVector": "LOCAL",
          "availabilityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "baseScore": 6.8,
          "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
          "confidentialityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "integrityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "modifiedAttackComplexity": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "modifiedAttackRequirements": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "modifiedAttackVector": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "modifiedPrivilegesRequired": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "modifiedSubAvailabilityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "modifiedSubConfidentialityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "modifiedSubIntegrityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "modifiedUserInteraction": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "modifiedVulnAvailabilityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "modifiedVulnConfidentialityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "modifiedVulnIntegrityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "privilegesRequired": "LOW",
          "providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "subAvailabilityImpact": "LOW",
          "subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
          "subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
          "userInteraction": "NONE",
          "valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:L/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:Y/R:A/V:X/RE:M/U:X",
          "version": "4.0",
          "vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
          "vulnConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
          "vulnIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
          "vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "MODERATE"
        },
        "source": "sirt@juniper.net",
        "type": "Secondary"
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2025-07-11T16:15:26.020",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "sirt@juniper.net",
      "url": "https://supportportal.juniper.net/JSA100092"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "sirt@juniper.net",
  "vulnStatus": "Awaiting Analysis",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-401"
        }
      ],
      "source": "sirt@juniper.net",
      "type": "Primary"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.